To: Theodore R.
I should think that this is now OUT of Judge Baird's grasp.
He is no longer being paid effective Jan 1st for presiding
over civil court. And the lawsuit against Governor Bush
is NOT is Judge Baird's criminal jurisdiction.
So what is Baird going to do? Come in on weekends?
Hold his own unpaid 'night court'?
I think it's time Judge Nelly stepped in and took over
this case. It belongs in her court.
To: FL_engineer
I had forgotten that Baird is "off" this case. It seems that he is trying to hold on to it because the most important thing to Baird is JUDICIAL POWER. He is power-mad as are thousands of American judges.
103 posted on
02/13/2004 5:45:52 PM PST by
Theodore R.
(When will they ever learn?)
To: FL_engineer
Greta is covering this case tonight!
To: FL_engineer
I should think that this is now OUT of Judge Baird's grasp.
He is no longer being paid effective Jan 1st for presiding over civil court. And the lawsuit against Governor Bush is NOT is Judge Baird's criminal jurisdiction.
Why is that? Does this have to do with the rotation that was mentioned a few months ago?
Is it possible that case could end up with Judge Nelly? Seems like that would be too good to come true.
119 posted on
02/13/2004 7:32:33 PM PST by
wisconsinconservative
("The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson