Skip to comments.
We Never Said Iraq Was Imminent Threat - CIA Chief
The Scotsman ^
| Thursday, 5th February 2004
Posted on 02/05/2004 8:46:13 AM PST by demlosers
CIA Director George Tenet said today that US analysts never claimed before the war that Iraq posed an imminent threat.
In his first public defence of pre-war intelligence, Tenet said analysts had varying opinions on the state of Iraqs chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programmes.
Those differences were spelled out in the October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate given to the White House that summarised intelligence on Iraqs weapons programmes.
Analysts painted an objective assessment for our policy makers of a brutal dictator who was continuing his efforts to deceive and build programmes that might constantly surprise us and threaten our interests, he said in a speech at Washingtons Georgetown University.
No one told us what to say or how to say it, he said.
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cia; georgetenet; imminentthreat; iraq; nie; prewarintelligence; tenet; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: azhenfud
And the truth shall set us all free.
End of story.
Great post - thanks for finding that.
Excellent President - re-elect him.
Tomorrow - we'll have one.
21
posted on
02/05/2004 9:10:10 AM PST
by
NordP
(Peace through Strength - W 2004 !!!)
To: Lee'sGhost; stuartcr; Pilgrimway
Laura Ingram predicted that the "no imminent threat" line would be the headline for the leftist news media, completely ignoring the rest of the speach: Analysts "painted an objective assessment for our policy makers of a brutal dictator who was continuing his efforts to deceive and build programs that might constantly surprise us and threaten our interests, " he said in a speech at Georgetown University.
"No one told us what to say or how to say it," Tenet said.
To: stuartcr
Wouldn't invading Iraq and going to war sort of imply an imminent threatNot when the president explicitly said that if we wait for the threat to become imminent, it would be too late.
23
posted on
02/05/2004 9:13:13 AM PST
by
alnick
(A vote for anyone but George W. Bush for president in 2004 is a vote to strengthen Al Qaeda.)
To: Pilgrimway
The media and the Rats
24
posted on
02/05/2004 9:13:40 AM PST
by
demlosers
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com">Miserable Failure</a>)
To: skip2myloo
"
Tenet needs to be fired."
Tenet is telling the truth; Democrats and critics only remember the "imminent threat" as they thought they heard it, but not in the context it was used....
25
posted on
02/05/2004 9:14:30 AM PST
by
azhenfud
("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
To: prairiebreeze
Didn´t Blair say that Iraq could launch WMD missiles within 45 minutes???
To: skip2myloo
do not agree. it is time to stop playing politics with the CIA that started with the peanut farmer, carter.
maybe tenet is not the best, but to change him just for the sake of the change is a bad idea. i listened to him and he seemed to make a little sense.
27
posted on
02/05/2004 9:15:56 AM PST
by
camas
To: skip2myloo
What, during the Iran-Iraq war ? No way, unless we would have wanted a triumphant Iranian Revolution toppling the whole Middle-East.
Remember those years, when Iran drove Iraqi forces past their frontier, mined the Ormuz Strait and fired missiles and rockets at oil tankers ? Iran was on the move, not Iraq, and it wanted a big Islamic Republic run by ayatollahs from Meshed to Riyadh.
I'd say the best moment to topple Saddam was in 1991, when his army had been broken to pieces and when the regional context was more favorable.
To: skip2myloo
Now we're parsing the word "imminent." 'Well, sure - Iraq was a threat, they weren't an imminent threat.' Just what is Tenet trying to claim ?? Tenet needs to be fired. Before the war, democrats were all over the talk shows yelling that the threat wasn't imminent. How could we consider going into Iraq since it wasn't yet an imminent threat? The Republicans explained that it would be irresponsible to wait until Saddam ready to use them against us. The president stressed this in his SOTU address, that the threat was a grave and gathering danger and that it would be foolish to do what the democrats had been suggesting, that is, wait until the threat is imminent before we do anything to stop it.
Almost immediately after we invaded Iraq, the democrats, in unison, changed their tune from "why is the president wanting to go into Iraq before the threat is imminent" to "the president claimed the threat was imminent."
The claim that the president declared Iraq an imminent threat to justify the war is an obvious lie.
29
posted on
02/05/2004 9:22:32 AM PST
by
alnick
(A vote for anyone but George W. Bush for president in 2004 is a vote to strengthen Al Qaeda.)
To: Michael81Dus
Didn´t Blair say that Iraq could launch WMD missiles within 45 minutes??? You got a link for this quote???
30
posted on
02/05/2004 9:24:00 AM PST
by
demlosers
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com">Miserable Failure</a>)
To: alnick
A good post.
31
posted on
02/05/2004 9:27:28 AM PST
by
demlosers
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com">Miserable Failure</a>)
To: alnick
OK, sure.
32
posted on
02/05/2004 9:28:23 AM PST
by
stuartcr
Comment #33 Removed by Moderator
Comment #34 Removed by Moderator
To: Buckhead
Thank you. I'll bookmark that one.
35
posted on
02/05/2004 9:44:58 AM PST
by
alnick
(A vote for anyone but George W. Bush for president in 2004 is a vote to strengthen Al Qaeda.)
To: demlosers
But he did not back Prime Minister Tony Blair's notorious claim that they could be fired in 45 minutes.Just did a google-search. It´s well known that Blair stated that.
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/040121/325/ejzrb.html
Comment #37 Removed by Moderator
To: Buckhead
I said OK.
38
posted on
02/05/2004 9:51:46 AM PST
by
stuartcr
To: skip2myloo
You're making the same mistake the media makes. You're focusing on one word and ignoring the context. Tenet is being pretty stand-up in his statement. Nobody ever said anything about imminent. A "gathering danger" is the phrase that The President used in the 2002 SOTU.
39
posted on
02/05/2004 9:52:04 AM PST
by
jayef
To: Michael81Dus
Uh, no. You don't think a little thing like the truth would stop the BBC from pursuing their agenda, do you?
40
posted on
02/05/2004 9:57:37 AM PST
by
jayef
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson