Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Opportunity Sees Tiny Spheres In Martian Soil
NASA - JPL ^ | 02-0402004 | Nadav Shragai, Haaretz Correspondent, and Reuters

Posted on 02/04/2004 6:40:23 PM PST by Phil V.

February 04, 2004

Opportunity Sees Tiny Spheres In Martian Soil

NASA's Opportunity has examined its first patch of soil in the small crater where the rover landed on Mars and found strikingly spherical pebbles among the mix of particles there.

"There are features in this soil unlike anything ever seen on Mars before," said Dr. Steve Squyres of Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., principal investigator for the science instruments on the two Mars Exploration Rovers.

For better understanding of the soil, mission controllers at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., plan to use Opportunity's wheels later this week to scoop a trench to expose deeper material. One front wheel will rotate to dig the hole while the other five wheels hold still.

The spherical particles appear in new pictures from Opportunity's microscopic imager, the last of 20 cameras to be used on the two rover missions. Other particles in the image have jagged shapes. "The variety of shapes and colors indicates we're having particles brought in from a variety of sources," said Dr. Ken Herkenhoff of the U.S. Geological Survey's Astrogeology Team, Flagstaff, Ariz.

The shapes by themselves don't reveal the particles' origin with certainty. "A number of straightforward geological processes can yield round shapes," said Dr. Hap McSween, a rover science team member from the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. They include accretion under water, but apparent pores in the particles make alternative possibilities of meteor impacts or volcanic eruptions more likely origins, he said.

A new mineral map of Opportunity's surroundings, the first ever done from the surface of another planet, shows that concentrations of coarse-grained hematite vary in different parts of the crater. The soil patch in the new microscopic images is in an area low in hematite. The map shows higher hematite concentrations inside the crater in a layer above an outcrop of bedrock and on the slope just under the outcrop.

Hematite usually forms in association with liquid water, so it holds special interest for the scientists trying to determine whether the rover landing sites ever had watery environments possibly suitable for sustaining life. The map uses data from Opportunity's miniature thermal emission spectrometer, which identifies rock types from a distance.

"We're seeing little bits and pieces of this mystery, but we haven't pieced all the clues together yet," Squyres said.

Opportunity's Mössbauer spectrometer, an instrument on the rover's robotic arm designed to identify the types of iron-bearing minerals in a target, found a strong signal in the soil patch for olivine. Olivine is a common ingredient in volcanic rocks. A few days of analysis may be needed to discern whether any fainter signals are from hematite, said Dr. Franz Renz, science team member from the University of Mainz, Germany.

To get a better look at the hematite closer to the outcrop, Opportunity will go there. It will begin by driving about 3 meters (10 feet) tomorrow, taking it about halfway to the outcrop. On Friday it will dig a trench with one of its front wheels, said JPL's Dr. Mark Adler, mission manager.

Opportunity's twin, Spirit, today is reformatting its flash memory, a preventive measure that had been planned for earlier in the week. "We spent the last four days in the testbed testing this," Adler said. "It's not an operation we do lightly. We've got to be sure it works right." Tomorrow, Spirit will resume examining a rock called Adirondack after a two-week interruption by computer memory problems. Controllers plan to tell Spirit to brush dust off of a rock and examine the cleaned surface tomorrow.

Each martian day, or "sol," lasts about 40 minutes longer than an Earth day. Spirit begins its 33rd sol on Mars at 2:43 a.m. Thursday, Pacific Standard Time. Opportunity begins its 13th sol on Mars at 3:04 p.m. Thursday, PST.

JPL, a division of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, manages the Mars Exploration Rover project for NASA's Office of Space Science, Washington, D.C. Images and additional information about the project are available from JPL at http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov and from Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., at http://athena.cornell.edu .

### Guy Webster (818) 354-5011 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California

Donald Savage (202) 358-1547 NASA Headquarters, Washington, D.C. NEWS RELEASE: 2004-051


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: mars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: flashbunny
Plus how to deal with muscles that atrophy after prolonged weightlessness (a bowflex in outer space).

What's interesting to note as well is that nothing beats keeping muscle tone like gravity. Even workouts in space do little to combat the atrophy.

Worse still is the degenerative effect on the skeletal structure. Calcium loss by the bones occurs at 1% a month (a rate 10 times faster than in osteoporosis).

If we are to have extended missions, we are going to need to simulate gravity somehow. And generating a 32 fps downward velocity takes some doing.

61 posted on 02/04/2004 11:04:55 PM PST by Prime Choice (I'm pro-choice. I just think the "choice" should be made *before* having sex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Hunble
2) What is the image source? Since they are not anaglyph's, I would like to reverse the images for crossed-eye viewing.

Ah, you mean I'm not the only Freeper who's annoyed that the stereoscopic pictures are always reversed from the way they should be? "Relax your eyes & let the images merge" indeed! Are we the only people who know how to cross their eyes?

62 posted on 02/04/2004 11:14:01 PM PST by jennyp (http://crevo.bestmessageboard.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Hunble
yah, I saw it the other day and wondered about it too. I haven't seen anything else posted in raw images from that field of view, only the one set of images.

Odd shape for a rock. Could be part of the lander or airbag.

63 posted on 02/05/2004 12:18:37 AM PST by no-s
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hunble
Exactly, Tektites, I couldn't remember the name, but that's my opinion also.
64 posted on 02/05/2004 1:32:34 AM PST by LayoutGuru2 (Call me paranoid but finding '/*' inside this comment makes me suspicious)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Phil V.
In that view it resembles some of the contents of my ash tray - and the flecks that are drawn to my computer monitor.
65 posted on 02/05/2004 3:16:18 AM PST by R. Scott (It is seldom that any liberty is lost all at once.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Phil V.
Don’t need a stereoscope, just slightly cross your eyes and look at the center image.
66 posted on 02/05/2004 3:17:41 AM PST by R. Scott (It is seldom that any liberty is lost all at once.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Hunble

Bugs: "I shoulda made a left at albakerky!"
67 posted on 02/05/2004 3:34:29 AM PST by ChadGore (Viva Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
If we are to have extended missions, we are going to need to simulate gravity somehow. And generating a 32 fps downward velocity takes some doing.

I have heard that you don't need to simulate 1g, something smaller should do. Also, it might not be neccessary to simulate it for the entire trip, just portions of it.

68 posted on 02/05/2004 9:07:43 AM PST by Paradox (Cogito ergo Doom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
I have heard that you don't need to simulate 1g, something smaller should do.

That is true. Even half a G would do.

Also, it might not be neccessary to simulate it for the entire trip, just portions of it.

Ew. That'd be naaaaaasty. Ever read about the changes the body goes through in going from normal gravity to microgravity? It ain't pretty and the adjustment period is unpleasant and disorienting in many ways. I think it'd be better to have gravity as a constant the whole way rather than making the crew go through readjustments several times in the journey.

69 posted on 02/05/2004 10:27:32 AM PST by Prime Choice (I'm pro-choice. I just think the "choice" should be made *before* having sex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
what's mars gravity at compared with earth?
70 posted on 02/05/2004 10:52:15 AM PST by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf
I believe mars gravit is 1/3 earth gravity.
71 posted on 02/05/2004 10:55:06 AM PST by Paradox (Cogito ergo Doom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
So would we need to enhance the gravity when we get there too?
72 posted on 02/05/2004 11:00:09 AM PST by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Phil V.
Has anyone noticed that the round particles look an awful lot like diatoms? That are found in seafloor deposits?

DIATOMS: Any of various microscopic one-celled or colonial algae of the class Bacillariophyceae, having cell walls of silica consisting of two interlocking symmetrical valves.


73 posted on 02/05/2004 11:06:42 AM PST by ElkGroveDan (Fighting for Freedom and Having Fun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf
I've wondered that too, and reasoned two possibilities:

1. Transmitting pictures over billions of miles tends to degrade their quality (for some reason). I don't know what that could be though, I'd be interested to find out.

2. In an effort to get there "cheaper, faster", NASA invested in some REALLY cheap cameras, that at your local SAMS or Wal-mart would retail for $20, but of course, they paid $2mil or so (which is still a bargain for a government agency :) )

I like to think it's #1, just because I don't like to be reminded of how wasteful our government is. hehe
74 posted on 02/05/2004 11:24:41 AM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Phil V.
"There are features in this soil unlike anything ever seen on Mars before," said Dr. Steve Squyres of Cornell University

I am just amazed at this statement. ANYTHING is going to be unlike anything else ever seen on Mars before. Hardly anything on Mars has ever been seen on Mars before. Jeezo!

75 posted on 02/05/2004 11:32:59 AM PST by webheart (Citizen's Grammar Patrol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven
Excellent artcle on the CCDs in this week's EETimes. THey are suberb sensors. For example, the read noise floor is 3, count 'em THREE, electrons. A full signal is 200,000 electrons/pixel. Signal uniformity across the array is better than 99%.

It runs from -90°C to 20°C. Although it's "only" a 1 megapixel camera, it is a very precise JPL designed sensor.
76 posted on 02/05/2004 11:40:02 AM PST by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Phil V.
Those rocks appear to be floating on the soil. I don't know anything about space photography and computer imagery, etc. But, it looks so surreal.

Could just be that pictures from Mars are still stunning! :)
77 posted on 02/05/2004 11:44:12 AM PST by Pan_Yans Wife (Say not, 'I have found the truth,' but rather, 'I have found a truth.'--- Kahlil Gibran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
That's interesting......so why are the pictures so grainy, relatively? Is it because some of the resolution had to be sacrificed for durability in extreme conditions?
78 posted on 02/05/2004 11:49:41 AM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: djf
Ya know what's been bugging me, can't NASA afford a color camera? My El Cheapo $50 Vivitar digital takes prettier pics than these!

Your cheapo camera has a program that converts raw data to colors intended to look pleasing. Those colors would be completely useless for analysing the composition of the various rocks and sediment. The NASA cameras are calibrated, as are the color filters, so that with time and care, the actual colors can be recreated.

79 posted on 02/05/2004 11:49:43 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven
Part of that might be because sand is grainy???

As for the rest:

Is it because some of the resolution had to be sacrificed for durability in extreme conditions?

the article says: "The CCD chip also has extremely large 'storage wells' behind each pixel. The chip can store a little more than 200,000 electrons in each well, Wadsworth [the designer] said, compared with perhaps 20,000 for a commercial digital camera. Larger well sizes help the camera cope with radiation and also with the extreme temperature range, since thermally generated background charge can fill the wells."

80 posted on 02/05/2004 12:22:14 PM PST by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson