Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: djf
I've wondered that too, and reasoned two possibilities:

1. Transmitting pictures over billions of miles tends to degrade their quality (for some reason). I don't know what that could be though, I'd be interested to find out.

2. In an effort to get there "cheaper, faster", NASA invested in some REALLY cheap cameras, that at your local SAMS or Wal-mart would retail for $20, but of course, they paid $2mil or so (which is still a bargain for a government agency :) )

I like to think it's #1, just because I don't like to be reminded of how wasteful our government is. hehe
74 posted on 02/05/2004 11:24:41 AM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: FourtySeven
Excellent artcle on the CCDs in this week's EETimes. THey are suberb sensors. For example, the read noise floor is 3, count 'em THREE, electrons. A full signal is 200,000 electrons/pixel. Signal uniformity across the array is better than 99%.

It runs from -90°C to 20°C. Although it's "only" a 1 megapixel camera, it is a very precise JPL designed sensor.
76 posted on 02/05/2004 11:40:02 AM PST by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson