Skip to comments.
BUDGET INCREASE FOR THE NATIONAL ENDOWMENT OF THE ARTS
The Drudge Report ^
| 01-28-2004
| Matt Drudge
Posted on 01/28/2004 6:18:24 PM PST by Captain Peter Blood
BUSH TO SEEK BIG BUDGET INCREASE FOR NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS... Laura Bush plans to announce the request -- for the largest increase in two decades -- on Thursday... Developing...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: arts; artsfunding; budgetbuster; bush; federalspending; laurabush; nea; taxdollarsatwork; youpayforthis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 861-880, 881-900, 901-920 ... 1,201-1,203 next last
To: jgrubbs
Among those clearly defined areas are the defense of the nation and the defense of our borders. Yes it does and immigration policy is part of that power. Bush made a proposal to address out of control illegal immigration, it is now the job of Congress to pass or defeat the proposal. A completely constitutional process.
To: TheConservator
Not a rational explanation It is not only a rational explanation it is the actual explanation. Laura is the one that announced this proposal.
To: TheConservator
see 784 what the heck
You know some one already pointed out that agencies like the NEA and NPR employ the wives and girl friends of the Washington elite. So all W is doing is scratching the back of a few "good ole boys" giving the gals something to do. But he sure pick the wrong agency. Conservative hate, loath the NEA. The NEA is a symbol everything conservative find wrong with government. To increase funding is bad, to do it in a major way, with a press conference is like telling conservative to go pound sand. And this conservative got the message loud and clear.
883
posted on
01/28/2004 10:42:11 PM PST
by
jpsb
(Nominated 1994 "Worst writer on the net")
To: Cinnamon Girl
Is the NEA really your worst nightmare? Honestly? I don't like it - I'm even a musician, and I'd love to see it get the big hook - but padding their budget is not my worst nightmare.
884
posted on
01/28/2004 10:42:11 PM PST
by
DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
(BUSH/CHENEY 2004...the alternative is too frightening to contemplate.)
To: Texasforever
Bush took an oath to protecth and defend the Constitution, he made an proposal that goes against our national security.
Your response is that it's up to the Congress to protect and defend the Constitution and strike down his proposal.
885
posted on
01/28/2004 10:42:21 PM PST
by
jgrubbs
To: PSYCHO-FREEP; nopardons; gatorbait; Texasforever
This whole thread proves something....Have you noticed that the Bush-bashers were spewing their slop well before CFR was signed, well before the Medicare drug bill, well before Bush's immigration proposal....Now this. NEA. This thread proves that the bashers stand for only one thing: hating George W. Bush. The issue makes no difference, just as long as it gives them the opportunity to break new wind on FreeRepublic.
886
posted on
01/28/2004 10:43:28 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("Failure is not an option.")
To: The Old Hoosier
What's Uncle Joe reading there? The Moscow edition of the New York Times?
887
posted on
01/28/2004 10:44:06 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("Failure is not an option.")
To: jgrubbs
Bush took an oath to protecth and defend the Constitution, he made an proposal that goes against our national security. Stop spouting platitudes and start laying out the constitutional basis for your argument.
To: My2Cents
just as long as it gives them the opportunity to break new wind on FreeRepublic Gosh I wish I had said that. LOL
To: My2Cents
Do you ever have anything interesting to say?
890
posted on
01/28/2004 10:45:50 PM PST
by
jpsb
(Nominated 1994 "Worst writer on the net")
To: jpsb
Do you ever have anything interesting to say? Hey you have homework to do. You are supposed to be making a case that this immigration proposal is unconstitutional.
To: Texasforever
figures, no class, yall teenagers?
892
posted on
01/28/2004 10:47:28 PM PST
by
jpsb
(Nominated 1994 "Worst writer on the net")
To: jgrubbs
Are you aware that the "size of government" has not changed one bit. In order to create for the Department of Homeland Security, they consolidated other agencies and used personnel from agencies that were no longer considered a priority. This fact is well documented and is a matter of Public Record.
As far as increasing spending, the budget was brought before congress for an 87 Billion $ increase to help fund the War. Other than that, the budget allotment for this year is the same.
Like I said, you make these ignorant statements without having a clue about what you're talking about. (You're not only hilarious, if you had a position of responsibility, you would be dangerous!)
893
posted on
01/28/2004 10:49:02 PM PST
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(Careful! Your TAGS are the mirror of your SOUL!)
To: jpsb; My2Cents
Do you ever have anything interesting to say?I can't believe you said that to My2Cents, who happens to be an intelligent, serious, and thoughtful poster. Good heavens.
894
posted on
01/28/2004 10:49:27 PM PST
by
DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
(BUSH/CHENEY 2004...the alternative is too frightening to contemplate.)
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet; Cinnamon Girl; PhiKapMom; onyx; Tamsey; Wolfstar; ohioWfan; woodyinscc; ...
Is the NEA really your worst nightmare? Good point. THIS is my worse nightmare --
But, I guess there are those who think the NEA is our worse nightmare, and the 9/11 attacks were simply good "reality TV programming."
895
posted on
01/28/2004 10:49:36 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("Failure is not an option.")
To: jpsb
figures, no class, yall teenagers? Make your case on the immigration proposals damage to the constitution.
To: Texasforever
Extremely bad policy, but I wouldn't call it unconstitutional just idiotic. The work product of an empty suit.
897
posted on
01/28/2004 10:49:50 PM PST
by
jpsb
(Nominated 1994 "Worst writer on the net")
To: My2Cents
I am right there with you, M2C.
898
posted on
01/28/2004 10:50:29 PM PST
by
DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
(BUSH/CHENEY 2004...the alternative is too frightening to contemplate.)
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
It was my performance art for the night.
You don't have to convince me to stick with President Bush. And Vice President Cheney. I love them. But I don't see anyone making a good case for why President Bush is proposing all this junky spending.
To: jpsb
Extremely bad policy, but I wouldn't call it unconstitutional just idiotic I see so you just indulged in a bit of hyperbole to make the case that Bush is simply idiotic. Do you not see the irony in that approach?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 861-880, 881-900, 901-920 ... 1,201-1,203 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson