We have as evidence the original, unsolicited call to the NEIN Director from an individual at an "agency in Virginia", and subsequent "confirmations" that the event did indeed occur. There are also the subsequent events and statements which have been analyzed and found to be consistent with the information about OBL's capture.
Now what I do not get is:
Why Sean has this intel? Even if he does have valid source's then why and how can he post this. I see what people are saying as it being hard to believe or understand. And how can Sean know this and yet the other people who also have 'sources on intel' are not publicizing it?
And why is he publicizing it? For ratings or what? Inquiring minds want to know.
two intelligence sources and one military source who separately and independently verified that that a "major Special Ops grab and go mission" took place about 48 hours prior in the southern region of Iran, a place we would not normally like to admit we have been. A HVT (High Value Target) of al Qaeda was scooped by special forces and removed from Iran. The sources would not identify the "target," but refused to deny that it was bin Laden.
I can imagine the conversation:
"Hey."
"Oh no, not you again."
"Yup, its me. Heard a rumor that OBL was nabbed by special ops in a place we're not supposed to be. Any truth to the rumor?"
"You know I can't talk about this stuff, and you know damn well that I don't respond to rumors."
"Well I know an HVT was nabbed. Is that HVT OBL?"
"No."
"Then you're admitting that special ops nabbed a HVT, but that it was not OBL?"
"No, I'm not admitting anything."
"Then you're denying it."
"I'm, not admitting or denying anything because there is nothing to admit or deny."
There you have it -- secret source refuses to deny that OBL has been captured.