[Calpernia]

Do me a favor? When I post something and I don't say, IMHO, or make it clear I'm speculating...it is in reference to something I KNOW.

So don't tell me I'm wrong with a post. I said fax for a reason.

Guess what? Not everyone is monitored.

[Quix]

Don't mind extending you the benefit of the doubt.

I have no idea what job or position of knowing you occupy or have occupied.

Given the info I was told in my Top Secret Crypto Navy Radioman's job 30 years ago, I shared what I was told.

I suppose it's conceivable that things fall through electronic cracks. All kinds of things are conceivable. And certainly we don't seem to have enough wise folks screening and interpreting and making USEFUL SENSE out of the MASSES AND MASSES OF DATA.

However, for you to make such a strong assertion in this day and age about faxes not being monitored, to be convincing, I'd think you'd offer more information--unless, I suppose, it would compromise you keeping your job or the security of the USA somehow.

Just knowing what I know, it seems VERY UNLIKELY TO ME that faxes would not be covered.

But hey, I'm a lot more wrong than I'd prefer a lot more of the time than I'd prefer. And it would be very nice to be wrong about this issue. I just haven't seen the convincing evidence.

Blessings,

[Quix]

BTW, Based on what should I counsider you a paragon expert on such issues?

We have had neither the close personal relationship nor even the close FR relationship which would be sufficiently convincing for me to trust you explicitly just based on our relationship and personal knowledge of you.

Most long term FREEPERS I KNOW would laugh at your request. But, I am willing to extend you the benefit of the doubt.

I WOULD PREFER AND ENJOY whatever supporting evidence or comment you can make about faxes not being covered.