To: Calpernia
Don't mind extending you the benefit of the doubt.
I have no idea what job or position of knowing you occupy or have occupied.
Given the info I was told in my Top Secret Crypto Navy Radioman's job 30 years ago, I shared what I was told.
I suppose it's conceivable that things fall through electronic cracks. All kinds of things are conceivable. And certainly we don't seem to have enough wise folks screening and interpreting and making USEFUL SENSE out of the MASSES AND MASSES OF DATA.
However, for you to make such a strong assertion in this day and age about faxes not being monitored, to be convincing, I'd think you'd offer more information--unless, I suppose, it would compromise you keeping your job or the security of the USA somehow.
Just knowing what I know, it seems VERY UNLIKELY TO ME that faxes would not be covered.
But hey, I'm a lot more wrong than I'd prefer a lot more of the time than I'd prefer. And it would be very nice to be wrong about this issue. I just haven't seen the convincing evidence.
Blessings,
4,968 posted on
02/02/2004 3:59:43 PM PST by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: Quix
I know a specific person that has a fax machine within the past few months. It is part of a recent change over to how this person has change the communication paths this person normally used.
No battles here with you.
4,973 posted on
02/02/2004 4:04:09 PM PST by
Calpernia
(http://members.cox.net/classicweb/Heroes/heroes.htm)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson