Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/21/2004 2:53:37 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: ambrose
Set foot.
2 posted on 01/21/2004 2:54:18 PM PST by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
Yes.
3 posted on 01/21/2004 2:56:41 PM PST by annyokie (Wesley Clark: Howard Dean with medals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
NO; unless the UN wants to move.
5 posted on 01/21/2004 3:04:38 PM PST by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
Among the products we use today that would not have been without the U.S. Space program: satellites, fire-resistant materials, sewage treatment, wireless communications, firefighter air tanks, winter tires, engine coatings, lightweight cutters to free accident victims, computer chips used for digital imaging breast biopsies, ultrasound scanners, insulin pumps, MRIs, radiation insulation, hydroponics, aerodynamically-efficient corporate jets, safer bridges, emission testing, electric cars, auto design, new semiconductors, structural analysis used by auto manufacturers, air quality monitors, virtual reality, global positioning systems used in navigation, microcomputers, enriched baby foods, water purification systems, scratch-resistant lenses, pool purification technology, energy-saving air conditioning, competition swimsuits, golf ball aerodynamics, portable coolers/warmers, cardiovascular sports training, athletic shoes, Dustbuster, shock-absorbing helmets, home security systems, smoke detectors, flat panel TVs, high-density batteries, trash compactors, food packaging and freeze-dried technology, sports bras, weather forecasting technology, laser angioplasty, microlasers for precision welding, and interactive computer training.


Does anyone actually believe this hyperbole?
6 posted on 01/21/2004 3:04:50 PM PST by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
Only if NASA does it with voluntary donations.

The time has come to say no to every new government program that comes along, other wise it will be impossible to say no to any government program.

This is just a more "upscale" welfare program designed to transfer the wealth of the workers to those in government graces.
7 posted on 01/21/2004 3:07:42 PM PST by Mark was here (My fan club: "Go abuse some family member, as I'm sure is your practice." - Principled)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
Remember what Dubya said in his NASA speech last week:
Two centuries ago, Meriwether Lewis and William Clark left St. Louis to explore the new lands acquired in the Louisiana Purchase. They made that journey in the spirit of discovery, to learn the potential of vast new territory, and to chart a way for others to follow.
So the answer is a resounding "YES!"

Damn the Luddites. Full speed ahead!

8 posted on 01/21/2004 3:07:57 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
"Is it worth the money to step foot on Mars?"

Are we going to be subjected to articles with these kind of titles for the next 20 years?

20 years of, "Can't this money be better spent on ......?" Please, no.

9 posted on 01/21/2004 3:09:37 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
Money spent getting to Mars is better spent than money spent supporting a million welfare brood mares
10 posted on 01/21/2004 3:10:07 PM PST by SauronOfMordor (Look as if you're playing by the other guy's rules, while quietly playing by your own)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
Tough to put a price tag on the value of exploration and discovery. Not a question I think you can absolutly answer in advance so by default I would say yes. Very few things on the list that have potential unlimited upside but this is one of them. Besides,if not us,who??
14 posted on 01/21/2004 3:13:11 PM PST by calljack (Sometimes your worst nightmare is just a start.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
Should we return to the moon and step foot on Mars?

I don't know, is the moon turning into Mars?

Just as a practical consideration, it will take months for an astronaut to hopefully land on that dismal excuse for real estate. Do we have a choice on who's going?

16 posted on 01/21/2004 3:14:58 PM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
"Is it worth the money to step foot on Mars?"

Follow the money and see who thinks it is worthwhile. Actually it may just be the Bush imitation of Roosevelt's WPA for unemployed scientists [hopefully American].

17 posted on 01/21/2004 3:14:58 PM PST by ex-snook (Where is the patriotism in the war on American jobs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
Yes. Absolutely. Positively. Affirmative.

Let's get a permission slip from the UN. [just kidding about the slavers and terrorists in the UN]

18 posted on 01/21/2004 3:14:58 PM PST by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
No
19 posted on 01/21/2004 3:15:37 PM PST by petercooper (Dean is Done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
Yes - Next Question!
22 posted on 01/21/2004 3:19:07 PM PST by The_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
Yes, and for the reason he alludes to: spin off technologies.

They're inevitible whenever somebody sets out to do something new.

I'd sure rather see public money spent trying to get to Mars than spent on welfare and entitlements. The money IS going to be spent. Might as well spend it on something that will have some value down the road.
24 posted on 01/21/2004 3:22:06 PM PST by Bobsat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
No NASA, no

36 posted on 01/21/2004 3:39:22 PM PST by southernnorthcarolina (How 'bout those CAROLINA PANTHERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
At 100 robots per human, I say stick to robots.
40 posted on 01/21/2004 3:44:16 PM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
The Chinese will probably beat us there since they really dont have to pay for the labor...
47 posted on 01/21/2004 4:22:55 PM PST by Dr. Marten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
I know there is Sweet Martian Crude Oil 100 Feet below the surface with a 5000 year Earth supply. Interplanetary Commerce will begin with GREED!

Could Mars be the ultimate dry hole?

Dreams about drilling on Mars date back
several years at least.

74 posted on 01/21/2004 8:50:15 PM PST by Major_Risktaker (dididit dadadah dididit Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ambrose
Pay for it yourself.
75 posted on 01/21/2004 8:52:12 PM PST by Stew Padasso (Head down over a saddle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson