Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnHuang2
Just for interest sake on a man who's constantly critical of other Republicans, Ron Paul has an only 81% pro-life voting record (well below most Texas Republicans) and has a much more pro-gay voting record than most of his GOP colleagues.

I don't at all see him as a straight-laced conservative.
9 posted on 01/21/2004 4:11:57 AM PST by No Dems 2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: No Dems 2004
Gosh, no, he's a pretty straight-laced libertarian. And he has lots of reasons to be critical of other Republicans. However, sure seems that no other people, let alone Republicans, in his district are willing to be critical enough of him to put their money where their mouths are, since no one even filed.

Either he's so right they don't even want to try, or his district is so dead on with his politics that there's no point, but either way, I'm glad we have at least one voice like his in Congress. God willing there will be more soon.
10 posted on 01/21/2004 4:48:27 AM PST by LibertarianInExile (When law is used to promote inequity, those oppressed will inevitably use it to turn the tables.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: No Dems 2004
From what I've read, Dr. Paul believes that our constitution is indeed the law of the land.

Sometimes legislation that appears to be "conservative" actually oversteps the constitutional limits on federal government.

As a man of principle, who honors his oath, he cannot vote for such legislation.

I wish we had more like him in congress.
11 posted on 01/21/2004 4:54:29 AM PST by WhiteGuy (Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: No Dems 2004
You're probably just mistaking a Constitutional voting record for a liberal one.
15 posted on 01/21/2004 5:58:26 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: No Dems 2004
, No Dems 2004 wrote:
I don't at all see him as a straight-laced conservative.

______________________________


"The federal government has no authority to promote or discourage any particular social arrangements; instead the Founders recognized that people should live their lives largely free of federal interference.  This is not to say that the Founders intended or imagined a libertine America.
  On the contrary, they envisioned an America with vibrant religious, family, social, and civic institutions that would shape a moral nation. 

They understood that strong private institutions, so important in a free and just society, could not coexist with a strong, centralized government."
-Ron Paul-





Straight-laced conservatives do not vote to give their state & federal governments the authority to promote or discourage any particular social arrangements.

Socialist dupes do exactly that every day.

17 posted on 01/21/2004 6:06:49 AM PST by tpaine (I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines a conservative. (writer 33)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: No Dems 2004
I don't at all see him as a straight-laced conservative.

Which no one that I know of has ever described him as, including himself.

25 posted on 01/21/2004 7:14:20 AM PST by Protagoras (When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: No Dems 2004
Could you please explain what a "straight-laced conservative" is? Could you also tell me where they derive their political beliefs from?
26 posted on 01/21/2004 7:22:21 AM PST by Durus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson