Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush loses in Iowa
WND ^ | 1-21-04 | Joseph Farah

Posted on 01/20/2004 10:41:23 PM PST by JustPiper

The big loser in the Democratic presidential caucuses in Iowa wasn't Howard Dean. It wasn't Dick Gephardt. It wasn't even Al Sharpton who managed to attract about .5 percent of the vote.

The big loser was George W. Bush.

Only one thing can explain the bizarre positions taken by the White House before this week – an overconfidence that President Bush would be facing Howard Dean in his re-election bid this November. Karl Rove's polling must have made the president's political advisers so cocky about the race that they felt invulnerable.

What else could explain the president doing the following:

proposing a politically unpopular amnesty program for illegal aliens;

raising spending on domestic programs by bigger percentages than any of his predecessors, including Democrats;

proposing a vague manned mission to Mars without providing even the least compelling reasons, goals and objectives?

Bush has made many other mistakes in his term, but these whoppers are very recent gaffes made leading up to an election year.

Iowa should provide a wakeup call.

Instead of facing an angry Democrat out of touch with mainstream American values and temperament, Bush may well be facing a seasoned, smooth, mature political pro in John Kerry.

I wonder if he is up to that challenge.

How about a Kerry-Edwards ticket?

I believe if the election took place today, that ticket would have an excellent chance of beating Bush.

I say this as a dispassionate observer, a political analyst. I will not vote for either Bush or Kerry, or any other Democrat seeking the nomination.

But I think it's worth noting we are witnessing the self-destruction of a president – much like his own father self-destructed politically when he broke his "read my lips" pledge.

The latest polls show Bush in a tight race for re-election even before it's clear who his opponent might be.

As a result, Bush finds himself in a statistical dead heat with the opposition nine months before the election. When matched against an unknown Democratic presidential candidate, Bush squeaks out a 48 percent to 46 percent victory. On the question of who is most trusted to handle the nation's major problems, Bush is virtually even with Democrats, ahead 45 percent to 44 percent – down from an 18-point advantage Bush enjoyed nine months ago.

Americans think the Democrats would do a better job on domestic issues – the economy, prescription drugs for the elderly, health insurance, Medicare, the budget deficit, immigration, even taxes.

And why shouldn't they?

Here's the way this presidential race is shaping up: Bush will propose spending $18 billion fighting AIDS in other countries. The Democrat will up the ante to $25 billion.

Bush will propose spending 10 percent more on domestic giveaway programs. The Democrat will up the ante to 20 percent.

If it is conceded that more spending is good, a Republican will lose every single time.

And that's just what Bush has conceded with his phony, so-called "compassionate conservatism," that is really no more than old-fashioned tax-and-spend liberalism.

Bush gained no advantage with the public for his prescription-drug plan. He gained no ground with his bid to legalize millions of illegal aliens. He gained nothing from his attempt at inspiring Americans to join a new space program with a goal of a manned Mars landing. And his domestic spending increases, under attack by his own Republican base, have not served to win new independent or Democrat voters.

In fact, a CBS News poll showed similar drops for Bush support – notably over his plans on immigration.

If Bush were deliberately throwing this election, he couldn't do a more masterful job of losing votes, breaking bonds with his constituency and losing touch with his base.

If ever there was a time for a third party to emerge with some alternative ideas, 2004 is it.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; constitutionparty; farah; gwb2004; iowa; josephfarah; mars; mojoashonasecret; presidentbush; rove; spending; thirdparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-454 next last
We begged him!
1 posted on 01/20/2004 10:41:23 PM PST by JustPiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gubamyster; Pro-Bush; FairOpinion; FoxFang; FITZ; moehoward; Nea Wood; Joe Hadenuf; sangoo; ...
Ping!!!
2 posted on 01/20/2004 10:42:02 PM PST by JustPiper (Register Independent and Write-In Tancredo for March !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
I deeply support President Bush and I am now beginning to worry about his re-election. I plan to vote for him, but in light of 9/11, I honestly fear that he has made a dreadful blunder with his stealth amnesty plan and lack of will to protect our Southern border. Please let me be wrong.
3 posted on 01/20/2004 10:45:35 PM PST by Enterprise ("You sit down. You had your say. Now I'm going to have my say.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
If ever there was a time for a third party to emerge with some alternative ideas, 2004 is it.

Alternative to Bush's liberal mix of statism and abandonment of border defense is the Constitution Party.

4 posted on 01/20/2004 10:46:35 PM PST by The_Eaglet (Opportunity for life: http://www.peroutka2004.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: JustPiper
I know, I know. Bush is toast. Dean didn't lose, Bush lost. Bush is toast, Bush is Toast. He was born with a silver boot in his mouth, Bush is toast, Bush is toast. I will fight for YOU!, Bush is toast, Bush is toast. I will crush the Bush army, Bush is toast, Bush is toast.
6 posted on 01/20/2004 10:48:55 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
Consider the source. It's nutty Joe Farah.
7 posted on 01/20/2004 10:50:21 PM PST by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
And this article wasn't even written by a 12 year old.
8 posted on 01/20/2004 10:50:52 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
But the bush bots say we are wrong.

They don't believe that conservatives have become the blacks of the pubbie party.

9 posted on 01/20/2004 10:50:58 PM PST by dts32041 ("Taxes are not levied for the benefit of the taxed" RAH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Eaglet
Your passion for principle is admired, but that is not an "alternative" as you put it. That is simply throwing in the towel.
10 posted on 01/20/2004 10:52:17 PM PST by bluefish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
In fact, a CBS News poll showed similar drops for Bush support – notably over his plans on immigration.

ALL IS LOST!!!!!!! CBS, the bastion of truth and objectivity has a poll indicating Bush has a drop in support! Omigawd! When CBS abandons President Bush, all hope is LOST!

Where is Pat Buchanan when we need him to lead us to the Promised Land? Oh drat, woe betide us all.

11 posted on 01/20/2004 10:52:36 PM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
Nay saying blather... Bush-Cheney is looking good.

WIN!

12 posted on 01/20/2004 10:52:41 PM PST by bonesmccoy (defend America...get vaccinated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
...if ever there was a time for a third party to emerge with some alternative ideas, 2004 is it...

Not necessary. Yet.

The real question is, where are the high-profile Republicans, who should be speaking out about the President's mid term lurch towards liberaldom? Why have they been neutered? They seemed to be everywhere, before the last election.

Maybe if someone on his own team would reproach the President on the amnesty and the PATRIOT Act, it might prompt a correction or at least softening, of his stance.

13 posted on 01/20/2004 10:54:14 PM PST by Byron_the_Aussie (http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/popup2.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
I know, I know. Bush is toast. Dean didn't lose, Bush lost. Bush is toast, Bush is Toast. He was born with a silver boot in his mouth, Bush is toast, Bush is toast. I will fight for YOU!, Bush is toast, Bush is toast. I will crush the Bush army, Bush is toast, Bush is toast.

\\\\\\\\\\
Easy. Take a deep breath!

(If Bush turns out to be toast, it will in large measure be due to his own idiotic moves so ably articulated by Farah.)
14 posted on 01/20/2004 10:55:13 PM PST by BenR2 ((John 3:16: Still True Today.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
Not the blacks, just modern day Jeremiahs demanding the loyalty of those they have shown none to. You are right, Bush is not listening to you, he knows you too well.
15 posted on 01/20/2004 10:55:28 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny
Consider the source. It's nutty Joe Farah.

//////////
I wish we had a whole lot more nuts like him.
16 posted on 01/20/2004 10:56:32 PM PST by BenR2 ((John 3:16: Still True Today.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BenR2
Nope, he is going to win big just like he has done his entire political career over better toasters that this.
17 posted on 01/20/2004 10:57:28 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
Bush has made huges mistakes. He is his a big government, big spending liberal that would let the nation be over run by illegals immigrants that seek to over throw our Constitutional government. The Rats are worse, I recommend drinking heavily.
18 posted on 01/20/2004 11:00:17 PM PST by jpsb (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
If there's one journalist opinion that can be counted on to bash Bush, it's Joseph Farah, followed by Maureen Dowd, Joe Sobran and the assorted raft and scaff. IOW, it's that time of year and journalists are sharpening their completely (cough) unbiased (cough, cough) swords.

Ol' Dean certainly got ganged up on by his brother Dems in the last few weeks. Not that he didn't deserve it, but the sharks are out and journalistic drive-by shootings are the order of the day.

19 posted on 01/20/2004 11:01:40 PM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluefish
"Throwing in the towel" would be for conservatives to vote for Bush, who just boasted of more liberal spending increases (3% just on the _domestic_ agenda, not including foreign aid and other activities abroad) and rolling out the welcome mat for illegal aliens, or to stay home on election day.
20 posted on 01/20/2004 11:02:14 PM PST by The_Eaglet (Opportunity for life: http://www.peroutka2004.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-454 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson