Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/20/2004 9:11:14 AM PST by KQQL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
To: Pubbie; Torie; ambrose
#
2 posted on 01/20/2004 9:11:44 AM PST by KQQL (^@__*^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
Looks like Zogby is bringing out the "Special Sauce" early this election.
3 posted on 01/20/2004 9:12:49 AM PST by Mad Dawgg (French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
Zogby keeps racing into irrelevance.

Dec 03' Iowa Poll by Zogby: Dean: 26%, Gephardt 22%, Kerry 9%, Edwards 5%

5 posted on 01/20/2004 9:14:25 AM PST by Naspino (You might be conservative -- but are you a patriot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
Nearly two in five (41%) would vote for Bush

LOL, these mathematical geniuses at it again? Is this the new "Zogby" math?

6 posted on 01/20/2004 9:14:36 AM PST by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
Understandable. Right now we have the Dem candidates vying for the nomination. They are getting their message out multiplied by eight now. Bush bashing is getting the biggest megaphone. Once the Dems have a candidate and Bush starts to get his campaign reved up, things will change. Until then, the dems are the only game in town for the media to cover.
7 posted on 01/20/2004 9:14:37 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
Timed for tonight's State of the Union Address. Gives the media a way to discount whatever he says.
8 posted on 01/20/2004 9:14:52 AM PST by Rightone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
Odd, I have just posted consecutive polls in NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, CALIFORNIA, PENNSYLVANIA and MICHIGAN, and in each case Bush as in the mid-50% approval (63% in MICHIGAN!) Now, if Bush is in the mid 50s to mid-60s in the blue states [!], does ol' Zogs really want us to believe that nationally he is doing worse?

I think not. Every polling # we have shows that despite comments here at FR, Bush gets over 90% of the GOP vote. So who the hell is Zogs polling?

9 posted on 01/20/2004 9:15:12 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrack of news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
It will not be a cakewalk with the dead, braindead, leechs, women and scam artists making up a large portion of the electorate. Easily led by the media they are.
10 posted on 01/20/2004 9:16:07 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
How much of that negative rating is attributable to conservatives?
11 posted on 01/20/2004 9:16:25 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
I don't think much of Zogby. However, I believe this poll could have some merit if GWB continues to alienate the GOP base.
15 posted on 01/20/2004 9:19:10 AM PST by wjcsux (If you can read this, you are in range.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
zobreath can kiss my ass
16 posted on 01/20/2004 9:19:40 AM PST by The Wizard (Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
im a registered zogy member and i dont recall being polled on this one. when i registered i was questioned about everything from blood type to party affiliation.

remember zogby is often commissioned to do these polls. the people who pay for them can choose who gets polled.
18 posted on 01/20/2004 9:20:21 AM PST by cripplecreek (.50 cal border fence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
Chrissy Matthews is going to have an orgasm tonight.....note to self...stay away from MSNBC.
19 posted on 01/20/2004 9:20:23 AM PST by mystery-ak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
Zogby Tracking - Iowa
Date Dean Gephardt Kerry Edwards Clark Lieberman
January 16-18 22% 18% 25% 21% 2% 1%
January 15-17 23% 19% 24% 18% 3% 1%
January 14-16 22% 19% 23% 18% 3% 1%
January 13-15 19% 19% 24% 17% 3% 1%
January 12-14 21% 21% 22% 17% 3% 1%
January 11-13 24% 21% 21% 15% 3% 1%
January 10-12 28% 23% 17% 14% 2% 1%
January 9-11 26% 23% 16% 12% 2% 2%
January 8-10 25% 23% 15% 14% 3% 3
21 posted on 01/20/2004 9:22:00 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
Bush’s Job Performance 49% Positive, 50% Negative;

A good State of the Union speech should take care of that. - Tom

22 posted on 01/20/2004 9:22:04 AM PST by Capt. Tom (Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb republicans. - Capt. Tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
Is this the same Zogby who considers "fair" to be a negative ranking?
27 posted on 01/20/2004 9:25:27 AM PST by ItsOurTimeNow ("By all that we hold dear on this Earth I bid you stand, men of the West!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
ZOGBY SAUCE DATA [ERROR ANALYSIS]:

Zogby IA Poll for 01/18/04 - Kerry 24, Dean 23, Gephardt 19, Edwards 18.
Actual IA caucus 01/20/04 - Kerry 38, Edwards 32, Dean 18, Gephardt drops out

CONCLUSION - ZOGBY off by 14% on Kerry, and a roomful of monkeys could do better
ZOGBY attempts to influence polls, for what purpose?

28 posted on 01/20/2004 9:26:23 AM PST by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
That's Bush's fault, pushing that "immigration amnesty" debacle, not to mention the McCain-Feingold bill.
30 posted on 01/20/2004 9:26:52 AM PST by theDentist (Boston: So much Liberty, you can buy a Politician already owned by someone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
Zogby gained undeserved credibility years ago when he was one of the few to predict an election right.

He's been off-base ever since then, but continues to use the media's credulousness to spread biased polls, serving his pro-Arab anti-Bush agenda.

32 posted on 01/20/2004 9:28:17 AM PST by shhrubbery!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
My recollection is that W has consistently fared poorly against "an unnamed Democrat", but polls much better when matched against any of the likely Dem nominees 1 on 1.

Perhaps the Dems should capitalize on that by not publicly announcing who their nominee is. Would it be legal to just put "Democratic nominee", rather than someone's name, on the ballot?
33 posted on 01/20/2004 9:28:23 AM PST by phil_will1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson