Skip to comments.
Zogby: Bush’s Job Performance 49% Positive, 50% Negative
zogby.com ^
| January 20, 2004
| zogby
Posted on 01/20/2004 9:11:14 AM PST by KQQL
As Democrats Vote in Iowa and New Hampshire, President Bush Looks Vulnerable in Both His Re-Elect and Face-Off with Generic Democrat; Bushs Job Performance 49% Positive, 50% Negative; Democrats Lead Over Republicans in Congressional Generic, New Zogby International Poll Reveals
President George W. Bushs job performance has dropped since mid- December, while his vulnerability increases when matched against an unnamed Democrat or when respondents are asked if he should be re-elected.
The most recent Zogby America poll of 1000 likely voters chosen at random was conducted January 15-18, 2004 and has a margin of error of +/- 3.2 percentage points. Slight weights were added to region, party, age, race, religion, and gender to more accurately reflect the voting population.Margins are higher in sub-groups.
Bush Job Performance Positive% Negative %
January 15-18, 2004 49 50
Nearly two in five (41%) would vote for Bush, while 45% would opt to support an unnamed Democrat over Bush. In December polling, Bush held a slight edge over a generic Democrat. Nearly one in eight are unsure or prefer another choice.
Date Bush % Any Democrat %
January 15-18, 2004 41 45
Pollster John Zogby: The country is clearly divided just as it was during the 2000 election. According to the OLeary/Zogby Red & Blue State Monitor, a plurality of Red State voters (Bush 2000) voters believe the country is headed in the right direction (49%), while 38% say its the wrong direction. In the Blue States (Gore 2000) 46% think the country is headed in the wrong direction while 41% say its the right direction. In both Red and Blue States (13%) a similar number unsure
(Excerpt) Read more at zogby.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: polls; zogby
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
To: KQQL
Zogby Tracking - Iowa
Date Dean Gephardt Kerry Edwards Clark Lieberman
January 16-18 22% 18% 25% 21% 2% 1%
January 15-17 23% 19% 24% 18% 3% 1%
January 14-16 22% 19% 23% 18% 3% 1%
January 13-15 19% 19% 24% 17% 3% 1%
January 12-14 21% 21% 22% 17% 3% 1%
January 11-13 24% 21% 21% 15% 3% 1%
January 10-12 28% 23% 17% 14% 2% 1%
January 9-11 26% 23% 16% 12% 2% 2%
January 8-10 25% 23% 15% 14% 3% 3
21
posted on
01/20/2004 9:22:00 AM PST
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: KQQL
Bushs Job Performance 49% Positive, 50% Negative; A good State of the Union speech should take care of that. - Tom
22
posted on
01/20/2004 9:22:04 AM PST
by
Capt. Tom
(Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb republicans. - Capt. Tom)
To: wjcsux
I'm sorry, but there is no polling evidence at all that Bush's "conservative base" is eroding, in any way, shape, or form.
That's why I noted that when pollsters get inside the numbers, they are finding Bush's GOP support is in the 90s, which is, I hate to tell you, unheard of.
23
posted on
01/20/2004 9:24:13 AM PST
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrack of news.)
ZOGBY and others Recent IA Polling VS Actual Results. ---------------------------------------------
Kerry Edwards Dean Gephardt Clark Lieberman
Final Caucus Results 37.7% 31.9% 18.1% 10.5% 0.0% 0.0%
Poll Dean Gephardt Kerry Edwards Clark Lieberman
Zogby Tracking (1/16-18) | 22% 18% 25% 21% 2% 1%
Insider Advantage (1/16-18) 19% 13% 24% 16% 1% 1%
Iowa Poll (1/13-16) 20% 18% 26% 23% 2% 1%
SurveyUSA (1/13-15) 24% 20% 21% 22% n/a n/a
KCCI (1/12-14) 22% 18% 21% 18% 2% 1%
LA Times (1/5-8) 30% 23% 18% 11% 4% 2%
QC Times (1/4-8) 23% 18% 15% 9% n/a n/a
http://realclearpolitics.com/Presidential_04/iowa_polls.html
=================================================
WINNER:
Iowa Poll (1/13-16) Dean 20% Dickey 18% Kerry 26% Eddy 23%
24
posted on
01/20/2004 9:24:29 AM PST
by
KQQL
(^@__*^)
To: finnman69
2002 Elections.....ooops
Zogby 10/26 - 10/29 49%R 51%D D + 2%
25
posted on
01/20/2004 9:24:41 AM PST
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: Mad Dawgg
but it works. look at Kerry. the media uses skewed polls to pull undecideds in the direction they want. they wanted Dean defeated, float a few polls showing Kerry making a move, and the sheeple will climb on board.
To: KQQL
Is this the same Zogby who considers "fair" to be a negative ranking?
27
posted on
01/20/2004 9:25:27 AM PST
by
ItsOurTimeNow
("By all that we hold dear on this Earth I bid you stand, men of the West!")
To: KQQL
ZOGBY SAUCE DATA [ERROR ANALYSIS]:
Zogby IA Poll for 01/18/04 - Kerry 24, Dean 23, Gephardt 19, Edwards 18.
Actual IA caucus 01/20/04 - Kerry 38, Edwards 32, Dean 18, Gephardt drops out
CONCLUSION - ZOGBY off by 14% on Kerry, and a roomful of monkeys could do better
ZOGBY attempts to influence polls, for what purpose?
28
posted on
01/20/2004 9:26:23 AM PST
by
Diogenesis
(If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
To: Dog Gone; deport
@
29
posted on
01/20/2004 9:26:44 AM PST
by
KQQL
(^@__*^)
To: KQQL
That's Bush's fault, pushing that "immigration amnesty" debacle, not to mention the McCain-Feingold bill.
30
posted on
01/20/2004 9:26:52 AM PST
by
theDentist
(Boston: So much Liberty, you can buy a Politician already owned by someone else.)
To: DrDeb
Have at it.
31
posted on
01/20/2004 9:28:03 AM PST
by
mystery-ak
(Almighty God, Embrace with Your invincible armour our loved ones in all branches of the service.)
To: KQQL
Zogby gained undeserved credibility years ago when he was one of the few to predict an election right.
He's been off-base ever since then, but continues to use the media's credulousness to spread biased polls, serving his pro-Arab anti-Bush agenda.
To: KQQL
My recollection is that W has consistently fared poorly against "an unnamed Democrat", but polls much better when matched against any of the likely Dem nominees 1 on 1.
Perhaps the Dems should capitalize on that by not publicly announcing who their nominee is. Would it be legal to just put "Democratic nominee", rather than someone's name, on the ballot?
To: KQQL
That Bush should have lower numbers just after announcing he is planning to give illegals amnesty is not such a bad thing.
34
posted on
01/20/2004 9:29:28 AM PST
by
Plutarch
To: finnman69
Looks like Zig-Zog was off by 13% on Kerry and 11% on Edwards for the Iowa caucus with his last poll. Not sure why commentators were saying the polls were so accurate last night.
35
posted on
01/20/2004 9:29:58 AM PST
by
GROOVY
To: phil_will1
Too bad the MADMAN LOST IA
36
posted on
01/20/2004 9:30:28 AM PST
by
KQQL
(^@__*^)
To: KQQL; dfwgator; demlosers; Pubbie; Torie; ambrose; jwfiv; Mad Dawgg; Naspino; kabar; LS; All
ZOGBY POLL RESULTS MUST ALWAYS BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE FOLLOWING DISCLAIMER:
Zogby uses a 4-category Excellent/Good/Fair/Poor schemata vs the traditional 2-category approve/disapprove schemata:
Zogby includes Excellent and Good responses only in his summative 'approve' stat, even though he admits that at least 50% of those who answer 'Fair' would also indicate that they APPROVE of the President's job performance. For this reason, Zogby's APPROVAL ratings are always 6-10 points BELOW traditional approve/disapprove surveys like the ABCNews/WashingtonPost completed during the SAME time period!
ABCNEWS/WASHINGTONPOST:
1/15-18/04
58% approve / 39% disapprove (+19)
[93% approval from Republicans]
37
posted on
01/20/2004 9:30:57 AM PST
by
DrDeb
To: GROOVY
Zog did call the Kerry Edwards surge correctly. the final caucus numbers are a little different as the caucuses are not straight up and down votes.
38
posted on
01/20/2004 9:32:47 AM PST
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: KQQL
Two questions:
1. How were "likely" voters chosen?
2. Isn't Zogby figuring in Democrat voter fraud?
Also, it sounds like Zogby's result would result in an electoral victory for Bush as well as a popular vote victory. Not bad, espeically when there isn't a very well defined opponent.
To: KQQL
I believe John Zogby about like I believe his brother. Which means I don't CAIR what either one say about anything.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson