Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jobs Americans Won't Do: Voodoo Economics from the White House.
National Review Online ^ | January 07, 2004 | Mark Krikorian

Posted on 01/07/2004 10:51:13 AM PST by xsysmgr

Today the president announces his plan for a vast new guestworker system, which would grant amnesty to millions of illegals currently in the United States, as well as import millions of new workers from abroad. (The president will also call for an increase in permanent legal immigration beyond the current rate of one million a year.)

I make the argument against amnesty in the cover story for the upcoming print version of NR, but here I want to look at the basic assumption underlying the whole Bush plan: that there are jobs Americans simply won't do, so that the importation of foreigners is essential. Whether these foreign workers are illegal aliens, guestworkers, or permanent legal immigrants is a detail to be worked out by us, the argument goes, but our need for them is unchanged.

Even many opponents of the proposed Bush Amnesty assume this to be true, leading them to propose new and improved guestworker programs, with provisions for stricter controls against permanent settlement, greater incentives to return, tighter enforcement against unscrupulous employers, etc.

As well-meaning as such efforts may be, the basic assumption is false — there is simply no economic reason to import foreign workers.

If the supply of foreign workers were to dry up (say, through actually enforcing the immigration law, for starters), employers would respond to this new, tighter, labor market in two ways. One, they would offer higher wages, increased benefits, and improved working conditions, so as to recruit and retain people from the remaining pool of workers. At the same time, the same employers would look for ways to eliminate some of the jobs they now are having trouble filling. The result would be a new equilibrium, with blue-collar workers making somewhat better money, but each one of those workers being more productive.

Many people fear the first part of such a response, claiming that prices for fruits and vegetables would skyrocket, fueling inflation. But since all unskilled labor — from Americans and foreigners, in all industries — accounts for such a small part of our economy, perhaps four percent of GDP, we can tighten the labor market without any fear of sparking meaningful inflation. Agricultural economist Philip Martin has pointed out that labor accounts for only about ten percent of the retail price of a head of lettuce, for instance, so even doubling the wages of pickers would have little noticeable effect on consumers.

But it's the second part of the response to a tighter labor market that people just don't get. By holding down natural wage growth in labor-intensive industries, immigration serves as a subsidy for low-wage, low-productivity ways of doing business, retarding technological progress and productivity growth.

That this is so should not be a surprise. Julian Simon, in his 1981 classic, The Ultimate Resource, wrote about how scarcity leads to innovation:

It is important to recognize that discoveries of improved methods and of substitute products are not just luck. They happen in response to "scarcity" — an increase in cost. Even after a discovery is made, there is a good chance that it will not be put into operation until there is need for it due to rising cost. This point is important: Scarcity and technological advance are not two unrelated competitors in a race; rather, each influences the other.

As it is for copper or oil, this fact is true also for labor; as wages have risen over time, innovators have devised ways of substituting capital for labor, increasing productivity to the benefit of all. The converse, of course, is also true; the artificial superabundance of a resource will tend to remove much of the incentive for innovation.

Stagnating innovation caused by excessive immigration is perhaps most apparent in the most immigrant-dependent activity — the harvest of fresh fruit and vegetables. The period from 1960 to 1975 (roughly from the end of the "Bracero" program, which imported Mexican farmworkers, to the beginning of the mass illegal immigration we are still experiencing today) was a period of considerable agricultural mechanization. But a continuing increase in the acreage and number of crops harvested mechanically did not materialize as expected, in large part because the supply of workers remained artificially large due to the growing illegal immigration we were politically unwilling to stop.

An example of a productivity improvement that "will not be put into operation until there is need for it due to rising cost," as Simon said, is in raisin grapes]. The production of raisins in California's Central Valley is one of the most labor-intensive activities in North America. Conventional methods require bunches of grapes to be cut by hand, manually placed in a tray for drying, manually turned, manually collected.

But starting in the 1950s in Australia (where there was no large supply of foreign farm labor), farmers were compelled by circumstances to develop a laborsaving method called "dried-on-the-vine" (DOV) production. This involves growing the grapevines on trellises, then, when the grapes are ready, cutting the base of the vine instead of cutting each bunch of grapes individually. This new method radically reduces labor demand at harvest time and increases yield per acre by up to 200 percent. But this high-productivity, innovative method of production has spread very slowly in the United States because the mass availability of foreign workers has served as a disincentive to farmers to make the necessary capital investment.

But perhaps immigration's role in retarding economic modernization is confined to agriculture, which, after all, is very different from the rest of the economy. Nope. Manufacturing sees the same phenomenon of a scarcity of low-skilled labor yielding innovation while a surfeit yields stagnation. An example of the latter: A 1995 report on southern California's apparel industry, prepared by Southern California Edison, warned of the danger to the industry of reliance on low-cost foreign labor:

In southern California, apparel productivity gains have been made through slow-growth in wages. While a large, low-cost labor pool has been a boon to apparel production in the past, overreliance on relatively low-cost sources of labor may now cost the industry dearly. The fact is, southern California has fallen behind both domestic and international competitors, even some of its lowest-labor-cost competitors, in applying the array of production and communications technologies available to the industry (such as computer aided design and electronic data interchange)." (Emphasis in original)

Conversely, home builders, who are still less reliant on foreign workers than some other industries, have begun to modernize construction techniques. The higher cost of labor means that "In the long run, we'll see a move toward homes built in factories," as Gopal Ahluwalia, director of research at the National Association of Home Builders, told the Washington Post several years ago. But as immigrants increasingly move into this industry, we can expect such innovation to spread much more slowly than it would otherwise.

But surely immigration is needed fill jobs in the service industry? After all, without immigrants, who will pump our gas? Oh, wait — we never imported immigrants for that and so now we pump our own gas, aided by technology that lets us pay at the pump — thus we have fewer attendants but more gas stations and get in and out faster than we used to when we trusted our car to the man who wore the Texaco star.

Other innovations suggest how, despite the protestations of employers, a tight low-skilled labor market can spur modernization even in the service sector: Automated switches have replaced most telephone operators, continuous-batch washing machines reduce labor demand for hotels, buffet-style restaurants need much less staff that full-service ones. As unlikely as it might seem, many VA hospitals are now using mobile robots to ferry medicines from their pharmacies to various nurse's stations, eliminating the need for a worker to perform that task. And devices like automatic vacuum cleaners, lawn mowers, and pool cleaners are increasingly available to consumers. Keeping down low-skilled labor costs through the president's vast new guestworker plan would stifle this ongoing modernization process.

The idea that a modern society like ours requires the ministrations of foreign workers, because there is no other way to do get these jobs done, smacks of the apocryphal quote from a 19th-century patent commissioner: "Everything that can be invented has been invented."

NRO Contributor Mark Krikorian is executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies and a visiting fellow at the Nixon Center.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial
KEYWORDS: aliens; immigrantlist; immigration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-248 next last
To: hobbes1
Hey I own a bar/eatery, the people that complain about the service are the one that NEVER tip or tip 50 cents on a 10 dollars tab. Tip and you will get good service, don't and you won't and believe me the staff remembers who tips and who desn't.
61 posted on 01/07/2004 11:54:14 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: StatesEnemy
Instead, they are importing slaves, and letting the rest of us subsidize their existence.

Bears repeating.

62 posted on 01/07/2004 11:54:31 AM PST by cmak9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: StatesEnemy
Instead, they are importing slaves, and letting the rest of us subsidize their existence.

Bears repeating.

63 posted on 01/07/2004 11:54:32 AM PST by cmak9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: StatesEnemy
Illegal aliens working legally cannot depress wages. Artificially controlling wages makes no good economic sense unless of course you subscribe to marxian economic theory.
64 posted on 01/07/2004 11:55:42 AM PST by eleni121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
Amen.
65 posted on 01/07/2004 11:57:29 AM PST by wasp69 (This tag line for sale because Dave Ramsey said so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
You need to put up a sign in your establishment about tipping policy.
66 posted on 01/07/2004 11:57:48 AM PST by eleni121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
To the contrary there are plenty of jobs that Americans won't do and won't do well.

And why is that?

67 posted on 01/07/2004 11:58:23 AM PST by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
I know alot of poor tippers are complainers, but I generally overtip, because i know that the person getting the tip is in a job that can be grueling, but I also live in a dense suburban area, No immigrants, many families with small children, and most of those jobs are filled by twentyish types, and the occasional older lady....

And the worst service comes from the overpampered types that feel the job is beneath them....
68 posted on 01/07/2004 11:58:26 AM PST by hobbes1 ( Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
Artificially controlling wages makes no good economic sense

Ohhh if only if it were true!

By allowing a flood of third worlders into the US job market, you are very MUCH artificially controlling wages.

Allowing employers to undercut the TRUE cost of doing business. (Namely - if you a shit job that needs doing, you SHOULD have to pay a premium)

69 posted on 01/07/2004 11:59:18 AM PST by StatesEnemy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Willie Green would be posting Luddite articles making the machines doing human work the enemy, rather than Mexicans, so what's the point?

I don't know too much about Willie, but someone would surely demonize businesses for automating.

70 posted on 01/07/2004 12:00:23 PM PST by TankerKC (...and, don't flash at me or I'll never move over!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: StatesEnemy
(Namely - if you a shit job that needs doing, you SHOULD have to pay a premium)

Stalin and Mao agree. In Marxian society the elites (educated, skilled) had no more financial compensation than the guy who shoveled shit.

71 posted on 01/07/2004 12:06:33 PM PST by eleni121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
Illegal aliens working legally cannot depress wages.

Illegals cannot work legally. It is illegal to knowingly hire illegals. By definition, illegals are illegal and therefore must break the law to work in the US.

72 posted on 01/07/2004 12:07:24 PM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
Have you actually made any attempt to follow this thread? Try it sometime.
73 posted on 01/07/2004 12:09:30 PM PST by eleni121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
Look, truth usually lies somewhere in the middle...

If say, a corporate farm wants it's produce picked, the market (based on the US market - not the Mexican, Chinese, Indonesian market) should dictate the wage.

Real simple econ 101.

74 posted on 01/07/2004 12:09:35 PM PST by StatesEnemy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
"After all, without immigrants, who will pump our gas? Oh, wait — we never imported immigrants for that and so now we pump our own gas, aided by technology that lets us pay at the pump — thus we have fewer attendants but more gas stations and get in and out faster than we used to when we trusted our car to the man who wore the Texaco star."

Mark's Economics For Dummies. I remember when there were never anything less than full-service gas stations with 2-3 attendants all over your car servicing under the hood, cleaning the windshield and you got a free drink glass with a fillup when you were done. (And road maps were free.)

Now with the price of gas sky-high, you pump it yourself, pay for it yourself and probably make more trips to the mechanic's since there's noone to let you know when there's a problem brewing with your engine -- unless you perform all those checkpoints yourself every time you go.

And this is called "Progress".

75 posted on 01/07/2004 12:12:19 PM PST by Middle Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
In Marxian society the elites (educated, skilled) had no more financial compensation than the guy who shoveled shit.

While I loathe most of the philosophy there is a certain truth to this nugget.

If the shit REALLY NEEDS TO BE SHOVELLED, a shit-shoveller might be a bit more valuable to a society than another well-educated Lawyer

76 posted on 01/07/2004 12:13:23 PM PST by StatesEnemy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Middle Man
"Mark's Economics For Dummies. I remember when there were never anything less than full-service gas stations with 2-3 attendants all over your car servicing under the hood, cleaning the windshield and you got a free drink glass with a fillup when you were done. (And road maps were free.)"

Oh, and gas was about 35 cents a gallon. Almost forgot.

77 posted on 01/07/2004 12:16:42 PM PST by Middle Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

Comment #78 Removed by Moderator

To: eleni121
Have you actually made any attempt to follow this thread? Try it sometime.

Yes. And your comment "illegals aliens working legally" is still incongruent.

79 posted on 01/07/2004 12:18:30 PM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
If these immigrants are really taking jobs that Americans "won't" do, then by all means give them guest worker visas and let them work here -- right AFTER we kick all the native born deadbeats off welfare!
80 posted on 01/07/2004 12:19:38 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-248 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson