Posted on 12/31/2003 8:12:13 AM PST by Rennes Templar
Edited on 12/31/2003 8:50:26 AM PST by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
Former Central Command chief Anthony Zinni denounces `ideologues' in Bush administration
Anthony Zinni's opposition to U.S. policy on Iraq began on the monsoon-ridden afternoon of Nov. 3, 1970. He was lying on a Vietnamese mountainside west of Da Nang, three rounds from an AK-47 assault rifle in his side and back. He could feel his lifeblood seeping into the ground as he slipped in and out of consciousness.
He had plenty of time to think in the following months while recuperating in a military hospital in Hawaii. Among other things, he promised himself that, "If I'm ever in a position to say what I think is right, I will. . . . I don't care what happens to my career."
(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...
No, we are not going to invade Iraq and topple Saddam Hussein either. Go to sleep and rest knowing that adults are in charge of your security.
You don't think they have workable WMDs. Go to sleep.
Yes, that is correct. It took many generations of British and other countries who thought that "out of sight and out of mind" was the best policy.(sorta like what you are suggesting)
This president and I know better and are beginning the process to bring these people into the 20th and then the 21st century.
It is a lack of intuition in a man who finally realizes when he is up to his neck in alligators that the initial opjective should have been to drain the swamp!.
Zinni is one of the finest General Officers I have ever served under and a credit to the USMC
He is responsible for setting us up for success in OEF and OIF. All the basing upgrades and new prepositioned equipment sites, all the agreements with the gulf arab nations so many of you seem to despise, our relations with the Pakistan military that allowed us to quickly set up shop on their soil and control overflight. All of that came on Zinni's watch.
I have participated in both OEF and OIF. I have previously worked for Gen Zinni in CENTCOM. He was universally liked and respected by everyone I knew who worked for him.
Zinni questioned the strategic timing of the war. His arguements were reasoned. I believe they were wrong but I'm sure it was a case of him being 40/60 against the warand me being 60/40 for it.
Having spent a lot of time in Iraq this past year I can tell you it was worth doing.
We will win
Micromanagement and inept meddling by OSD has cost us a lot of yardage though. To use a football analogy we're first in ten on the badguy's 40 yard line. If Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz hadn't been doing their MacNamara imitation we'd be deep in the red zone first and goal
I think this is what has Zinni so pissed off.
He's just saying what a lot of active duty guys are thinking in that respect
I disagree with him on some things but it's an honest difference of opinion. I have tremendous respect for the man and his abilities
I'll agree with Gatorbait though - talking to Ricks wasn't the smartest thing he ever did. He probably got misquoted a lot.
I'd still follow him on a movement to contact a lot quicker than I'd follow most of his critics on this thread
All the best
Qatar-6
So true. Without intervention it will snowball and we or our allies would be targeted with anything and everthing that they could or can lay there hands on.
Saddam may very well have already made the deliveries before we got to him.
If he did, it will become apparent sooner or later in some part of the planet.
There was no Iraq expansionism--only failed aggression against its neighbors. It was Gulf War I that stopped Saddam and then it was sustained by a military enforced regime of no fly zones, inspections, and economic sanctions. The latter two did not work very well.
There are plenty of countries with equally bad human rights violations.
Agree, but US national security and economic interests are also involved in Iraq. Human rights violations are not the sole criterion for US military action. Different problems will require different solutions, .i e., differention in our foreign policy.
Hundreds of Americans have lost their lives in Iraq during the invasion and occupation. Only a handful died from 1991 to 2003
9/11 changed the calculus in terms of our objectives in Iraq. Regime change became the objective. Saddam violated 17 UN resolutions and failed to observe the agreement he signed ending Gulf War I. Rightly, Bush (with Congressional approval) and Blair agreed that our national security interests were at stake by permitting Saddam to remain in power. Over 3000 lives were lost to terrorism on 9/11 and hundreds more around the globe since then. We have liberated Afghanistan from the Taliban, Iraq from Saddam, and forced Libya to reconsider its pursuit of a WMD program. As painful as the loss of life may be in terms of our military and other USG personnel, it is the price we must pay to further our national interests and protect ourselves.
Zinni was the commander of CENTCOM
Zinni had no responsibility for any operation in the Balkans
Sorry
In your mind, is a terrorist a terrorist only if he is an anti-American terrorist?
Killing innocent Jewish civilians isn't terrorism?
Killing innocent Iraqi civilians isn't terrorism?
Your "counter-arguments" are well worth ignoring.
But, some of the older officers do not like what they are doing to the military. They do not like the changes in mission and equipment. They are stung by the cancellation of the new arty stuff and they believe in the older concepts.
This I can understand, because as a man in my 50s, I have have about all the changes I can stomach.
But, on the flip side he should not be out there working against the administration publicly in this time. he could work behind the scenes as the general public is largely not at all knowledgeable about these things.
His "plan", good or bad is totally of no relevance now and is history.
He should fade away of teach. He should not be writing op-eds and stirring the election pot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.