Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

From Here to Eternity. The unintended consequences of war.(Ripples of Battle, a book review)
The Washington Monthly ^ | December 03 | Jon Meacham

Posted on 12/30/2003 7:23:17 AM PST by Valin

On Tuesday, September 11, 2001, horrified by the news from the East Coast, Victor Davis Hanson began writing. A classicist and farmer in California, Hanson kept at it everyday through that momentous fall, ultimately publishing his thoughts and pieces in a small but highly influential book entitled An Autumn of War. The collection's overarching (and, to me, convincing) theme: that war is an inherent element of the human condition and that the wisest course in a fallen world--one in which evil can strike out at innocents, without warning, on a brilliantly blue morning, widowing spouses and orphaning children--is to appreciate the tragic quality of life. Once we accept that the world will almost always fall short of our expectations, that man is not perfectible, and that answering violence with violence is sometimes the moral thing to do, we can start to make ourselves, our children, and our culture more secure. Hanson's book was read at the highest levels of the Bush administration.

Now comes a new offering from Hanson, Ripples of Battle, which once again has a strong resonance with the events of the day. This book arrives in an uneasy climate, a time that seems less certain than the months after September 11. In the long run, will the war with Iraq ignite a democratic revolution in the Middle East? Or will it strengthen the deadly hand of Islamic extremists? Or will there be entirely unforeseeable consequences? After reading Hanson's book--a case study of three battles long ago--my vote is for the last of these possibilities.

Ripples of Battle is in some ways an even more sober book than An Autumn of War, and I hope that the same important people who read the first will consider the second with care. We all know about what we might call "the waves of war"--that the Civil War abolished slavery and made us one nation, and World War II conquered Nazism and unleashed the atom. Leaders who use only broad strokes to create the impression that wars unfold in neat sequences (enemy identified; enemy overthrown; energies of previously captive peoples unleashed; democracy reigns; security established), however, are not leading well. No serious person should ever try to predict what comes after a war, and in these times Americans deserve realistic and candid assessments of how hard it is to project power and build peaceful nations.

Hanson writes well, in a learned but accessible voice. "Books abound on Hannibal's encirclement at Cannae, the stealth of Arminius, Rommel's use of Panzers, or LeMay's devilish brew over Tokyo," he notes. "But rarely do we appreciate battles as human phenomena or the cumulative effects--the ripples--that change communities for years, or centuries even, well after the day's killing is over." This is not by any means an anti-war argument. It is, instead, a bracing reminder that combat and its wages, while conducted by human beings, are in the end beyond human control. "Battle is the raucous transformer of history," Hanson observes, "because it also accelerates in a matter of minutes the usually longer play of chance, skill, and fate." If, as Winston Churchill once said, "The story of the human race is war," then Hanson is giving us a significant elaboration of the theme: that the ripples of battle are unknowable. In my reading, a key implication of Hanson's case is that insofar as they can, great war leaders should prepare their people for the unexpected. Landing on an aircraft carrier in a flight suit and standing before a banner reading "Mission Accomplished" when men and women are still under fire at the front is not preparing people for the unexpected; it is spinning them in defiance of history. Churchill, arguably the greatest war leader of all, understood this, once saying: "There is no worse mistake in public leadership than to hold out false hopes soon to be swept away. The British people can face peril or misfortune with fortitude and buoyancy, but they bitterly resent being deceived or finding that those responsible for their affairs are themselves dwelling in a fool's paradise." From his lips to President Bush's ears.

Discussing Japanese suicide attacks at the battle of Okinawa, Hanson deftly links that desperate kamikaze struggle with the ensuing 60 years. "The American navy left Okinawa convinced that warfare in the Pacific had to continue to be far more harsh and terrible than what had transpired in Europe," he writes. "They concluded that Asians in their caves, holes, and suicide ships and planes were a different--usually thought to be a more fanatical--foe than Germans or Italians, and so were deserving of even more extreme treatment. And that conjecture would have consequences in American thinking in the decades to come in the bombing campaigns ahead in Korea and especially Vietnam, where massive caves and underground fortifications were eerily reminiscent of Okinawa and likewise impregnable to occasionally mindless American carpet bombing."

The Civil War's Shiloh created a new Yankee hero, William Tecumseh Sherman, and a new Confederate one, Nathan Bedford Forrest. Sherman was struck by the sheer bravery of the Southern troops and began to realize frontal assaults were not the key to victory; there would have to be another way. "To Sherman," writes Hanson, "it was wrong to fight at Shiloh, in which his Midwesterners--themselves no abolitionists--were blasted apart while shooting down poor Southern boys who owned neither slaves nor much property. Far more humane, he grasped, was to burn the estates of the rich and the buildings of the rebel statesmen who had voted for secession; free the slaves who were critical to the Southern economy and whose enslavement had prompted the rebellion; and demonstrate that no Confederate soldier could charge the Union line with the certainty that his government and homeland far to the rear were safe from fire and ruin." Sherman may have had the humane intention of shortening the conflict by taking it to selected elite targets, but the strategy had huge unintended consequences: It alienated and infuriated Southerners for generations. On the other side of the line, Forrest won the hearts of his troops by defying orders that would have kept him on the fringes of the action. "Boys, do you hear that rattle of musketry and the roar of artillery?" he asked his soldiers. "Do you know what it means? It means that our friends and brothers are falling by hundreds at the hands of the enemy, and we are here guarding a damn creek." Galloping into the fray, and into history, Forrest became a great folk hero to ordinary Confederate fighters, and he later used that capital to found the Ku Klux Klan. The ripples from this one Tennessee battle in 1862 include, in a way, the painful war against Jim Crow and its long shadows; Richard Nixon's Southern Strategy; the fall of Trent Lott; and endless skirmishes over the Confederate battle emblem.

Hanson concludes his book with a rediscovery of the battle at Delium, in 424 B.C. The Boeotians were threatened by the Athenians. It was, according to Hanson, "perhaps the first recorded defense of the strategy of preemption--of attacking an enemy that posed a long-term rather than immediate threat …" Pagondas, a Theban commander, spoke words that might have come from Donald Rumsfeld in this new century: "Furthermore, those who in confidence of their strength have a habit of attacking their neighbors, as the Athenians are doing now, are emboldened to march out against an adversary who is keeping quiet and will only defend itself inside its own land; but they are less ready to take him on when he is willing to fight outside his borders, and if opportunity arises, to strike the first blow." The point: Pagondas is making a pitch for a classical version of "shock and awe"--a tricky analogy for our times, given that Pagondas was leading a fight against the democratic Athenians.

"It is well that war is so terrible," Robert E. Lee once remarked, "or else we should grow too fond of it." Wars are indeed the way we destroy greater evils. The world is a brighter, better place today because Winston Churchill and Franklin Roosevelt led the battle against Germany and Japan; we must pray that the war on terror led by George Bush and Tony Blair--and by those who come after them--will make us and our children safer.

As Hanson's book makes clear, however, war is not what happens on a single day or in a single campaign. It is a deeper and more fundamental part of our lives, one we cannot escape. Hanson quotes Heraclitus, who 2,500 years ago observed that war is "the father, the king of us all." That is a tragic fact of life, and we should hope the men and women who are leading us at this perilous hour appreciate that battles cannot be packaged.

Meanwhile, as fervently as we hope for quick entrances and safe exits, history teaches us that wars tend to have a force and course of their own, and the more direct and honest our leaders are about that essential truth, the better off we will be.

Jon Meacham is the managing editor of Newsweek and a contributing editor of The Washington Monthly. He is the author of Franklin and Winston: An Intimate Portrait of an Epic Friendship.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bookreview; ripplesofbattle; vdh; victordavishanson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 12/30/2003 7:23:18 AM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Valin
Victor Davis Hanson is a very wise man.

Here are some Recent Articles posted on FreeRepublic.

2 posted on 12/30/2003 7:56:40 AM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Very good article; thanks for posting it.

I'm not surprised it doesn't have a lot of comments yet. These articles that are very thought-provoking take time to digest.

3 posted on 12/30/2003 7:57:13 AM PST by MrNatural (..".You want the truth?!"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Meanwhile, as fervently as we hope for quick entrances and safe exits, history teaches us that wars tend to have a force and course of their own, and the more direct and honest our leaders are about that essential truth, the better off we will be.

Since Meacham is such an admirer of Churchill's, perhaps he should recall what he said about a bodyguard of lies. Sounds like a great book,Valin;thank you.As for the reviewer,well, his leftism is glaringly obvious.

4 posted on 12/30/2003 8:00:38 AM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
bump
5 posted on 12/30/2003 8:04:16 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin; seamole; xkaydet65; Fury; .cnI redruM; xsysmgr; yonif; SJackson; monkeyshine; Alouette; ...
Victor Davis Hanson new book review BUMP  [please freepmail me if you want or don't want to be pinged to Victor Davis Hanson articles]

If you want to bookmark his articles discussed at FR: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/k-victordavishanson/browse

His NRO archive: http://www.nationalreview.com/hanson/hanson-archive.asp


6 posted on 12/30/2003 9:12:53 AM PST by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: MrNatural
I agree with the authors premise that Okinawa lead to the use of the atomic bomb and Sherman's concept of total war.
However Dr. Hanson's choice of Delium is riddled with what ifs....what if Socrates had been killed etc. There were many other battles that changed the thinking of commanders and Generals but as a classicist I guess he had to toss in a Hoplite or two.
8 posted on 12/30/2003 10:07:53 AM PST by ijcr (Age and treachery will always overcome youth and ability.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait
How odd it is that someone could put a leftist, defeatist spin into a VDH BOOK REVIEW! I'm aghast....no really....well, maybe not.
9 posted on 12/30/2003 10:16:28 AM PST by Nix 2 (http://www.warroom.com QUINN AND ROSE IN THE AM-104.7 FM in da Burgh-as of Jan. 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ijcr
..as a classicist I guess he had to toss in a Hoplite or two.

Right. He's written books about nothing but Hoplites. :)

Myself, I find that area of his writing kind of difficult to stay with; probably because I don't have a real depth of knowledge about that era. All his other writing, with examples from times I'm more familiar with, are greatly interesting. He is truly a thinker whose work will long outlive him.

10 posted on 12/30/2003 10:32:27 AM PST by MrNatural (..".You want the truth?!"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Hanson always takes the broad view on issues of war and peace. He has become one of our greatest popular thinkers on such issues. If anyone wants to truly understand what the US and the world are facing and undertaking to do in this post-9/11 era, they need only read Victor Davis Hanson.
11 posted on 12/30/2003 10:59:47 AM PST by My2Cents ("Well....there you go again...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MrNatural
>>Myself, I find that area of his writing kind of difficult to stay with; probably because I don't have a real depth of knowledge about that era.

Have you read VDH's Carnage and Culture? If not, you should consider doing so. It's a more-than-worthwhile read, and it should give you enough background to understand his classical references.

12 posted on 12/30/2003 11:04:16 AM PST by FreedomPoster (this space intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Meacham is trying to use one of the deepest thinkers of our time, Victor Davis Hanson, to make Bush appear shallow. For example, the line, "Landing on an aircraft carrier in a flight suit and standing before a banner reading "Mission Accomplished" when men and women are still under fire at the front is not preparing people for the unexpected; it is spinning them in defiance of history.

Who's spinning here? The U.S. military achieved tremendous success by overthrowing a tyrannical and dangerous regime. That mission was accomplished. The sign didn't say, "Vision Accomplished", it said "Mission Accomplished", which it was.

When war is necessary, it's necessary. It was necessary, and we're winning. Now shut up, Meacham, until it's over.

13 posted on 12/30/2003 11:05:42 AM PST by AZLiberty (Be the Butterfly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nix 2
I'm aghast....no really....well, maybe not

I know, Nix, I too am SHOCKED beyond belief! I thin I'm gonna have to add this to my library.

14 posted on 12/30/2003 11:08:17 AM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
..Culture and Carnage..

I'll put it on my list; I currently have 'The Western Way of War' and 'The Soul of Battle', and I'm planning to get ' Autumn of War' and 'Ripples of War', so I guess one more won't hurt :)

15 posted on 12/30/2003 11:12:23 AM PST by MrNatural (..".You want the truth?!"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: seamole
For this reason, I suspect Hanson's book is much different than what is conveyed by the author of this review....and much better.
16 posted on 12/30/2003 11:20:41 AM PST by My2Cents ("Well....there you go again...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MrNatural
Do read "An Autum of War." It will blow away all of the moral confusion the left and the Democrat candidates have been tossing into the air regarding the War on Terror.
17 posted on 12/30/2003 11:22:40 AM PST by My2Cents ("Well....there you go again...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MrNatural
Certainly read Carnage and Culture before Ripples of Battle, and you might consider it before some of those others. C&C is a very important work for understanding VDH and Western military thought.
18 posted on 12/30/2003 11:24:48 AM PST by FreedomPoster (this space intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty
Thank you for your point! Bush is criticized for claiming "Mission Accomplished," while the fighting was still going on, and more American soldiers have died since that speech on the Lincoln. This is a typical tactic of the left -- putting words in Bush's mouth, and then criticizing him for it. It's like the criticism Bush gets for taking down Saddam when Iraq wasn't an "imminent threat" to the U.S. Bush never used the "imminent threat" justification for war against Saddam, arguing the exact opposite -- that if we wait for Iraq to become an imminent threat, we've waited too long.

As you correctly point out, the mission of the war in Iraq was to topple the Saddam regime. "Mission accomplished!" The new mission is win the peace, and to build a stable Iraq. That mission continues.

19 posted on 12/30/2003 11:26:57 AM PST by My2Cents ("Well....there you go again...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

Hanson always takes the broad view on issues of war and peace. He has become one of our greatest popular thinkers on such issues. If anyone wants to truly understand what the US and the world are facing and undertaking to do in this post-9/11 era, they need only read Victor Davis Hanson.

You are right on money.

20 posted on 12/30/2003 11:32:15 AM PST by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson