Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
I am not justifying him.

I am calling for her punishment by the court system that will punish him.

One crime is not mitigated by another greater crime.

If you seek justice, seek justice for all, including this man.

Bad customer service is not an excuse for assault, if she cannot deal with mean people she should not be in a store by herself. Once she threw the money and spat on him she crossed the line of proportionate response for bad service.

Again equal justice for all. Both have done wrong and both should be punished by the law, anyone calling for less is wrong.

109 posted on 12/29/2003 3:52:23 PM PST by CyberCowboy777 (This Quiet Diplomacy was brought to you by BIG STICK foreign policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: CyberCowboy777
Fine if it is proven that she threw the nickles or spat then, she need to apologize and be banned from the store.

That is a proportionate response. And it should have been the one dealt out in the first place.

It can not be proven that she in any way meant to cause him harm. He doesn't even allege that he was struck by the nickles that she allegedly threw. He on the other hand went after her with the intent to humiliate and cause bodily injury. You see the difference?

114 posted on 12/29/2003 4:10:03 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Plausible deniability was so much simpler before every one started carrying those pesky vid-cams.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson