Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hodar
If she decides to have kids immediately, instead of waiting; you are expected to support her unilaterial decision.

So it's always the woman's fault when she get's pregnant? Last I looked it took two to make a baby.

164 posted on 12/11/2003 11:15:01 AM PST by CajunConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]


To: CajunConservative
Last I looked it took two to make a baby.

Intellectual honesty here, please. We both know that women have lied and deceived men to get pregnant for purely selfish reasons. A woman can intentionally flush her pills in the toilet, yet deceive her husband into believing that she is taking them. How many women do you know who claim to have gotten pregnant while on the pill? Funny, isn't it that the pill worked for years and years without a problem. But suddenly she wants a baby, and the husband says "we need to wait a year" and whammo ... the pill 'suddenly' quit working.

Also, the way the present laws stand, a wife man get pregnant by any male, and legally the husband is obligated to pay child support for the child. Hardly fair by any stretch of the imagaination. But, after all the though process is 'Whatever is best for the child'.

I wonder what anguish that would arise if wives found themselves getting childsupport demands made against them if their husband went around impregnating their mistresses. Naturally, the childsupport payments would stick to the wife after the divorce. Fair is fair, wouldn't you say?

172 posted on 12/11/2003 11:25:33 AM PST by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson