1 posted on
12/04/2003 11:27:48 AM PST by
presidio9
To: presidio9
Oh, come on. Are we really THAT low on "causes" that we have to settle for this???
To: presidio9
Women need twice as many potties because they always take a friend.
3 posted on
12/04/2003 11:33:49 AM PST by
Kenton
To: presidio9
In regards to potty facilities, "equality" is NOT a good thing. Women need more stalls than men since guys also have the benefit of urinals, and don't take as long to "undress-and-dress". On a practical note, guys shouldn't have to wait on the ladies to get-in and get-out. Happens at fairs, airports, theatres, parks, ...
4 posted on
12/04/2003 11:35:27 AM PST by
AngrySpud
(Behold, I am The Anti-Crust ... Anti-Hillary)
To: presidio9
This is important news for women. Believe me, everytime I've attended a large function there are two-three times the women standing in line than in a men's line. Keep in mind that women also bring the small children in with them as opposed to the man taking the children. Plus, the clothes that woman must pull down before relieving herself. And, frankly, I cannot recall ever seeing a men's line at the potty. I've long believed that it had to be a man that designed potties.
To: presidio9
Hell no, we won't go!
6 posted on
12/04/2003 11:37:05 AM PST by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: presidio9
Some in the plumbing industry argue that the number of toilets needs to be increased for both sexes.I am in the "Systems Consulting" industry...I think the amount of "Systems Consulting" purchased "needs to be increased for both sexes", too.
To: presidio9
Getting twice as much as the other group is not "equity." "Equity" would be, well, equal numbers.
If women want to be equal, they should be equal. If they want special consideration for the differences between men and women, that's fine. Just don't call this special consideration "equity."
SD
To: presidio9
If they had slit trench type johns (to seats) the way the French do in public restrooms, where everyone would either stand or squat, depending on their purpose and/or gender, then we would not have this problem.
And if we could all then bark like dogs....
nevermind.
13 posted on
12/04/2003 11:54:09 AM PST by
kimoajax
To: presidio9
Flat pottie ratio = same # of potties for each sex. No one is entiltled to "equal" time to go.
To: presidio9
Yvette Clarke and Bill de Blasio, both Democrats, Gee, what a surprise.
18 posted on
12/04/2003 12:35:51 PM PST by
SkyPilot
To: presidio9
More whining.... When does it stop? Just make all the restrooms unisex.
21 posted on
12/04/2003 12:46:37 PM PST by
Cobra64
(Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
To: presidio9
They could always take the Title IX approach, and create parity by eliminating toilets in the men's rooms...
22 posted on
12/04/2003 1:07:06 PM PST by
LouD
To: presidio9
Twice? Jeez, how about just the same number of places to aim at that the guys have: If the men's room has three toidies and two urinals, then how about five toidies in the ladies room? That seems fair enough to me.
23 posted on
12/04/2003 1:11:27 PM PST by
mewzilla
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson