Let's see ...
Oh wait, he hasn't had a trial yet, has he? OK, what was he charged with that he should "fry" for?
What? He hasn't even been charged with a crime? Hmmmm.
Well, when he was arrested, certainly there were charges, right? Not arrested you say?
You say he "was involved" with the illegal drug market -- what do you mean? Can you be a little more specific? I mean, if we're going to decide if Rush should fry, I sure would like to know for what.
What a maroon.