Oh wait, he hasn't had a trial yet, has he? OK, what was he charged with that he should "fry" for?
What? He hasn't even been charged with a crime? Hmmmm.
Well, when he was arrested, certainly there were charges, right? Not arrested you say?
You say he "was involved" with the illegal drug market -- what do you mean? Can you be a little more specific? I mean, if we're going to decide if Rush should fry, I sure would like to know for what.
What a maroon.
Now, of course, because of his celeberty status.... you are willing to give Rush the benefit of the doubt.
Which is what you SHOULD have ben giving those other drugs cases all along. At least you are consistant in your hypocrisies.