To: JohnHuang2
He's got a good point.
Who gets to choose which "alternatives" are legal? Equal protection clause.
If one type of "irregular" marraige is allowed, all should be allowed. It's discrimination against a certain "choice" if the court votes otherwise.
"Polygomists have rights, too!"
To: JohnHuang2
Polygamy makes a lot more sense than gay marriage.
(In fact, polygamy makes more sense than monogamy.)
To: JohnHuang2
Polygamy?? Who cares, I'm going to marry my dog, she is one perfect bitch...
11 posted on
12/02/2003 10:15:38 PM PST by
Porterville
(No communist or french)
To: JohnHuang2
I suspect that the main goal behind gay marriage is the destruction of heterosexual marriage.
The gays and the hetorosexual-liberals are some of them unconsciously, and others of them consciously, resentful of the heterosexual family and traditional American family values.
And they sense (the more intelligent will know) that imposing gay marriage on America will wreck all marriage and erode traditional American family values.
To: JohnHuang2
I will marry my son when hes 18.
He can then avoid probate, inheritance taxes, no need for expensive irrevocable living trusts.
I can now give him more than 10,000 annually without paying any gift tax!
Marrying will enable us to really reduce our tax exposure when transferring funs from generation to generation. Or from one family/corporation to another family/corporation.
People involved in shady dealings can marry to prohibit being compelled to testify against one and other in case they are caught.
Also,
I will be offering marriage on Ebay for $100.00 each to any one that wants to become a US Citizen.
When the liberals realize that they just made it very easy to transfer funds without having to pay taxes THEY will put a stop to this amoral nonsense. Not because liberals have any moral sense but because their life philosophy is so flawed they cannot survive on reduced tax income.
19 posted on
12/02/2003 10:43:36 PM PST by
Kay Soze
(Liberal Homosexuals kill more people than Global Warming, SUVs’, Firearms & Terrorism combined.)
To: JohnHuang2
The funny thing is, this guy is probably too religious to sodomize any of his wives, but he still wants the ruling to apply to him and his family...
26 posted on
12/03/2003 12:24:40 AM PST by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: JohnHuang2
heeeere we go!
deviant sexuality slippery slope,
ground floor: normalcy
- first floor: sodomy
- second floor: gay marriages
- third floor: polygamy
- fourth floor: livestock
- fifth floor: 14yr age of consent
- sixth floor: NAMBLA
...
...
...
bottom floor: Hell
32 posted on
12/03/2003 6:20:42 AM PST by
King Prout
(...he took a face from the ancient gallery, then he... walked on down the hall....)
To: JohnHuang2
Will the pedophiles try this next?
33 posted on
12/03/2003 6:25:01 AM PST by
hope
To: JohnHuang2
Didn't Senator Santorum get excoriated for making this point about the SCOTUS sodomy decision?
To: JohnHuang2
I would get married again if I could have at least 5 husbands....
One to clean and cook,
One to dance with,
One to fix things,
One to talk to,
One to shop with,
And one for the bedroom...
Ok, make that six husbands.
38 posted on
12/03/2003 11:10:43 AM PST by
najida
(Nope, this isn't breaking news either. Come back after dinner.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson