To: JohnHuang2
He's got a good point.
Who gets to choose which "alternatives" are legal? Equal protection clause.
If one type of "irregular" marraige is allowed, all should be allowed. It's discrimination against a certain "choice" if the court votes otherwise.
"Polygomists have rights, too!"
To: concerned about politics
Right now homosexual activists are claiming that they are being discriminated against when they immigrate to the US because their foreign "same sex marriages" are not recognized by the US.
Of course some other nations allow polygamy marriages that are not acknowledged in the US and some nations permit child brides, again a practice that is not acknowledged in the US.
3 posted on
12/02/2003 10:02:44 PM PST by
weegee
To: concerned about politics
Didnt some Pub take heat for predicting just such a thing would happen?
Apologies?..Anyone? Anyone?
ROTFLMAO!!!!!
4 posted on
12/02/2003 10:03:42 PM PST by
icwhatudo
(The rino borg...is resistance futile?)
To: concerned about politics
Agree. It's the ol' slippery-slope. Which happens to be true.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson