[Calpernia]

Prior post from first input from my judge/military friend found here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1030675/posts?page=636#636

He forwarded for more input to his judge/military colleagues and this commentary came back:

(snip)

First of all, the only reason that Mrs. Clinton could not be brought up on treason charges is because she doesn't advocate the overthow of the sitting government by violence. Congress should censure her on a non-partisen basis. She may have killed her political career by doing such a stupid, insensitive, inapropriate thing to troops in the war theater. Those of us that were in Viet Nam and other area's surrounding, remember what happened to Jane Fonda for what she did. The same will happen to Hillary Clinton. ****next comment removed so Moderator won't pull post*****

(snip)

PhiKapMom, I saw comments from you about starting a new thread. Did this happen yet? Can you ping me there?

I'm waiting for more questions to be answered to see if there is any other recourse we can take other than writing letters (we all need to continue this; but I'm angrily hoping for more of a recourse).

[nicmarlo]

the only reason that Mrs. Clinton could not be brought up on treason charges is because she doesn't advocate the overthow of the sitting government by violence. Congress should censure her on a non-partisen basis.

Hitlery's no fool...she carefully chose her words; nevertheless, the spirit of those words betrayed her true meaning...which is blatantly obvious: She, indeed, wishes for a violent overthrow of the President and his policies.....

But unstated wishes are not grounds for the charge of treason; I continue to believe, however, she is guilty of sedition.

[JustPiper]

I'm waiting for more questions to be answered to see if there is any other recourse we can take other than writing letters (we all need to continue this; but I'm angrily hoping for more of a recourse).

Bump!!!