Posted on 11/14/2003 5:15:05 PM PST by RobFromGa
and always has been.
BTTT
Yes, it is more significant than we were led to believe, but I don't think it is at all a surprise to Bush or Blair. In fact I still recall Blair saying that it was only a matter of time before the Saddam-terrorist nexus would happen. The most difficult factual public argument to make would have been the terrorist connection. Saddam's history and violation of UN resolutions were a matter of fact. So Bush focused on what was established. But I am betting that the strongest argument Bush saw was the terrorist connection. That was the wild card that made war the only choice.
Original caption: Al-Jazeera staff work at the satellite channel's headquarters in the Qatari capital Doha 10 October 2001. US Secretary of State Colin Powell said al-Jazeera is giving too much air time to Islamic extremists and others with radical views in its coverage of the US-led war on terrorism. Al-Jazeera is the only channel with corresondents reporting live from the besieged Afghan capital and the city of Kandahar, another top target of the US strikes. AFP PHOTO /Joseph BARRAK
[rohrpost] Fwd: noch ein Interview mit Bin Laden
New York Times
>December 12, 2001
> >Interview With Bin Laden Makes The Rounds
> >By James Risen and Patrick E. Tyler
> >WASHINGTON, Dec. 11 Al Jazeera, the Persian Gulf television network, >obtained an exclusive interview with Osama bin Laden in October, the >only television interview the terrorist leader has given since the war >in Afghanistan began. But the network never broadcast the interview, >partly because it revealed how much Mr. bin Laden had intimidated the >network's correspondent, according to American and Middle Eastern >government officials.
> >Later, however, Britain and the United States secretly obtained copies >of the interview, and on Nov. 14, British Prime Minister Tony Blair used >it to buttress the West's public case that Mr. bin Laden was responsible >for the Sept. 11 attacks.
> >At the time, Mr. Blair did not identify the source of the tape, and said >only that it was "an inflammatory interview, which has been circulating, >in the form of a video, among supporters in the Al Qaeda network." Mr. >Blair referred to the tape when he issued his second public statement >detailing evidence collected by the United States and Britain to prove >that Mr. bin Laden planned the Sept. 11 attacks.
> >But American and Middle Eastern government officials now say that the >tape was from the interview with Al Jazeera, believed to have been >conducted on Oct. 20 somewhere in Afghanistan by a correspondent then >working out of Kabul.
> >The tape of the interview was produced earlier than the one discussed in >recent days by the Bush administration in which Mr. bin Laden, speaking >during a dinner, reportedly gloats about the attacks. That was a home >movie of sorts; this is a professional television interview.
> >Mr. Blair, quoting from Al Jazeera's interview, said that Mr. bin Laden >declared that "the battle has been moved inside America, and we shall >continue until we win this battle, or die in the cause and meet our >maker." He also quotes Mr. bin Laden as saying that "the bad terror is >what America and Israel are practicing against our people, and what we >are practicing is the good terror that will stop them doing what they >are doing."
> >The decision not to broadcast the tape is believed to have been made >after Al Jazeera news executives reviewed it at their headquarters in >Qatar. The tape shows Mr. bin Laden's refusal to answer the reporter's >questions; instead he dictates both the questions and the answers. The >correspondent for Al Jazeera, who has not been identified, appeared >fearful and intimidated. "He looked like a wimp," said one government >official.
> >Al Jazeera officials in Doha, Qatar's capital, refused to respond fully >to questions about the tape. Several of them denied knowing about an >interview with Mr. bin Laden.
> >Abrahim Helal, a news executive with the network, said in an interview >that he did not know of any interview turned over to the British and >American governments.
> >Since Sept. 11, Mr. bin Laden is known to have granted only one other >interview besides the one that Al Jazeera apparently decided not to >broadcast. That was with a Pakistani newspaper reporter who was brought >into Afghanistan to meet him. In addition, Mr. bin Laden released a >videotaped statement on the day the United States-led military campaign >began, Oct. 7.
> >The United States and Britain have still not released the videotape from >the Al Jazeera interview, and officials said there are no plans to do >so.
> >After Al Jazeera decided not to broadcast the tape, it began circulating >among Arab government officials and others in the Middle East, and >eventually both the United States and Britain separately obtained >copies, officials said. "It seemed like people everywhere in the Middle >East had seen the tape, including the King of Jordan," one official >said.
> >Al Jazeera officials did not hand over the tape directly to the British >government for use in Prime Minister Blair's statement, and the British >and the Americans appear to have obtained it from officials in Arab >governments who were increasingly concerned by Al Jazeera's growing >influence in the region.
> >Prime Minister Blair decided not to reveal the tape's origin in part >because the British government wanted to keep the focus on what Mr. bin >Laden said in the tape, rather than on the work of Al Jazeera. American >officials have also refused to discuss the circumstances surrounding the >videotaped interview publicly to avoid harming the method in which it >was obtained. When asked about the videotape, one American official said >only that Al Jazeera has tried to be "responsible" in what does and >doesn't broadcast.
> >Al Jazeera's decision not to broadcast the interview with Mr. bin Laden >followed a private meeting in October between Vice President Dick Cheney >and the Emir of Qatar, Shaykh Hamad Bin-Khalifah Al Thani, about Al >Jazeera's inflammatory, anti-American broadcasts. Qatar's ruling family >has financed the network.
> >American officials stress that Mr. Cheney's complaints about Al Jazeera >were general in nature, but Al- Jazeera's decision not to air the tape >followed the meeting in Washington.
I don't know. I, however, do see Iraq's fingerprints on any number of terrorist attacks that have happened between those two dates.
Now, in order to pursue the charge of treason, we must divulge our intelligence and our methods to the enemy?
Let's ship Rockefeller to Guantanamo forthwith and be done with it.
At this pont, I'd settle for kicking him off the Intelligence Cmte and censuring him.
This says it all.
we'd love to . But there is one thing that keeps that from happening. the uaw/afl cio /teamster et al. loving Wayne county. Figure a way to nullify that and he's toast. otherwise the schmuck will die in office of old age.
Slainte,
CC
By BATFE standards ..?.. an arsenal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.