Skip to comments.
NYT NEWSROOM TURMOIL OVER PRINCE CHARLES GAY RUMOR
Drudge Report ^
| 11/07/03
| Matt Drudge
Posted on 11/07/2003 1:43:48 PM PST by nickcarraway
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-146 next last
To: nickcarraway
The NYT...More adventures in clowny town.
2
posted on
11/07/2003 1:45:31 PM PST
by
metalboy
(Liberals-Nuke `em from orbit. It`s the only way to be sure.)
To: nickcarraway
To: nickcarraway
Ahh... The New York Slimes
All the smut that's fit to make up.
4
posted on
11/07/2003 1:46:44 PM PST
by
WinOne4TheGipper
(Using Occam's Razor to shave the hairy beast of liberalism...)
To: martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; Miss Marple; Tamsey; ...
This is the New York Times Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.
5
posted on
11/07/2003 1:46:53 PM PST
by
Timesink
To: nickcarraway
You would think they would be overjoyed and would publicize this immediately.
6
posted on
11/07/2003 1:47:15 PM PST
by
petitfour
To: petitfour
His being gay would explain a lot...
7
posted on
11/07/2003 1:48:00 PM PST
by
IGOTMINE
(He needed killin')
To: nickcarraway
Royal British buggery? You don't say!
To: nickcarraway
"savior of the world"
9
posted on
11/07/2003 1:48:24 PM PST
by
evets
(Warning: graphic images.)
To: nickcarraway
To: Thinkin' Gal
Oh, that picture is hysterical!
To: nickcarraway
NYT NEWSROOM TURMOIL OVER PRINCE CHARLES GAY RUMOR
Fri Nov 07 2003 16:45:11 ET
Top editors at the NEW YORK TIMES panicked and ordered a story killed after London-based reporter Sarah Lyall filed a dispatch alleging rumors of Prince Charles and a sexual affair with one of his closest advisers!
The story appeared on the TIMES's internet website for 20 minutes -- before top editors ordered it immediately removed, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.
"This should never have been published!" a top newsroom source explained Friday evening.
Lyall reported: "No one would say what the rumor was. Not the British newspapers, which were writing long, innuendo-laced articles about it. Not the television commentators, who were discussing it with acrobatic opacity. Especially not Prince Charles, who seemed to be hoping it would just go away...
"The allegation (although no one has said so publicly) has to do with purported sexual contact between Prince Charles, the heir to the throne, and Michael Fawcett, one of his closest advisers."
Developing...
12
posted on
11/07/2003 1:49:10 PM PST
by
Timesink
To: Thinkin' Gal
My feathers are prettier than his.
13
posted on
11/07/2003 1:49:40 PM PST
by
Xenalyte
(I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
To: nickcarraway
Was this the throne-shaking story the butler is supposed to be releasing? Good grief - British aristocrats have been buggering one another since Algore invented it in AD 100. I think it's kinda like a lodge initiation.
Well, I might have my history wrong there. It may have been earlier than that.
To: nickcarraway
And to think that instead of being King, he really wanted to be Queen.
15
posted on
11/07/2003 1:51:59 PM PST
by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Proudly Not Reading The Headlines Since 1999)
To: nickcarraway
...or gay advisor.....
Hmmmm, what to do.....
16
posted on
11/07/2003 1:52:20 PM PST
by
TrebleRebel
(If you're new to the internet, CLICK HERE.)
To: Xenalyte
My feathers are prettier than his.Everything about you is prettier than him.
17
posted on
11/07/2003 1:52:47 PM PST
by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Proudly Not Reading The Headlines Since 1999)
To: AxelPaulsenJr
Oh, I don't know . . . he might have a very nice uvula.
18
posted on
11/07/2003 1:53:53 PM PST
by
Xenalyte
(I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
To: nickcarraway
Oh my, wondered if this was the case of the non story. Some are saying he watched as someone else was raped, but what I heard this morning made me think he was the culprit himself, hmmm!
19
posted on
11/07/2003 1:54:06 PM PST
by
ladyinred
(Talk about a revolution, look at California!!! We dumped Davis!!!)
To: Timesink
Michael Fawcett, The Prince's Butt Boy?
20
posted on
11/07/2003 1:54:17 PM PST
by
jimbo123
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-146 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
