1 posted on
10/31/2003 7:49:53 PM PST by
UnklGene
To: UnklGene
But he told The Telegraph that the Church had to modernise its views on morality
And there we go again. Leftist degenerates keep telling us that we have the problem and we must change our thoughts.
These people call us nazi's???
2 posted on
10/31/2003 7:52:25 PM PST by
GeronL
(Visit www.geocities.com/geronl)
To: UnklGene
lifelong-intentioned relationships What a wonderful phrase this bishop-to-be has come up with! It's clinton-speak for: "We'll split as soon as either of us feels like it!"
3 posted on
10/31/2003 7:55:26 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: UnklGene
More than 6,000 people are expected to attend tomorrow's consecration, when Bishop-elect Robinson will be flanked by his ex-wife, his two daughters and his boyfriend, Mark Andrews.Just damn! Proof positive that this 'fivesome' is really an odd number.
4 posted on
10/31/2003 7:55:57 PM PST by
UnklGene
To: UnklGene
So he's comparing the prince's lifelong love for this woman to his faggotry?
To: ahadams2
Ping for the list?
6 posted on
10/31/2003 8:00:00 PM PST by
Ryle
To: All
7 posted on
10/31/2003 8:03:44 PM PST by
Cindy
To: UnklGene
"It's very difficult for me to understand how New Hampshire having its own bishop who happens to be gay affects the day-to-day life in a church in Nigeria," said Bishop-elect Robinson.
Just another reason why this bishop-elect is unfit to head a church or shepherd souls. But then, Prince Charles is the heir to the titular title of this particular Charch, and this just goes to show that there is no such thing as a 'harmless immorality.'
To: UnklGene
"We have this very odd situation in Britain with the heir to the throne cohabiting with a woman without the benefit of marriage because the Church over which Charles is going to be head when he becomes king still does not allow remarriage in church. My first thought was that Charles criticizing Robinson was a case of the pot calling the kettle black.
But as Evelyn Waugh argues in "Brideshead Revisited," for a believing Christian, the worst kind of sexual sin is to get married illegitimately. A brief affair is less serious than that. If Robinson was unable to resist having a homosexual affair with this guy but still decided to stick with his wife and kids and broken the affair off, at least he would have been trying to do the right thing.
Contrary to what these gay-agenda people say, it's worse for a Christian believer to have a life-long homosexual relationship than it is to fall into an occasion of sin but then repent it. Better, even, to try and fail to straighten out than not to try at all.
12 posted on
10/31/2003 8:14:47 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: UnklGene
This is all very queer.
13 posted on
10/31/2003 8:15:59 PM PST by
elbucko
To: UnklGene
He said he did not relish the argument over his election and that it was his desire that the Anglican Communion would hold together. Baloney. He doesn't desire it very deeply or he'd have dropped out of contention for the bishopric. As a former Episcopalian, I say with all my heart that the condoning of this abominable situation is worth a church split on the part of those who understand that homosexuality is an accursed practice, regardless of whether it is forced or consensual. Scripture even provides for it by teaching those who live in grace to separate themselves from their brethren who won't repent after two warnings.
14 posted on
10/31/2003 8:25:08 PM PST by
GretchenEE
(Liberals CANNOT be trusted with national security [excepting maybe Congr. Norm Dicks].)
To: UnklGene
But he told The Telegraph that the Church had to modernise its views on moralityPax to all my Anglican friends, but the English royalty is not part of the magisterium for Christian doctrine. That was how the whole Church of England thing started, with the King pronouncing himself head of the church and changing Christian doctrine and practice on marriage. Christ founded the church on apostles, not kings. Please pardon this anti-Erastian rant.
To: UnklGene
What part of abomination did he not get?
23 posted on
10/31/2003 10:00:41 PM PST by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: UnklGene
How very tacky by the King of Tacky.
26 posted on
11/01/2003 6:19:22 AM PST by
altura
To: UnklGene
"Sodom and Gomorrah is about homosexual rape. St Paul is talking about idolators," he said, incorrectly.
The sodomite bishop is reaching for a lower common denominator by implying that two wrongs make a right - which they do not. Just because the(?!) chuch changes it's understanding of anything doesn't necessarily mean that it's correct. This man is the straw that's going to break the Anglican organization in two. He is not concerned with being a bishop, Christianity, or in repenting towards Christ; he is concerned with himself.
31 posted on
11/01/2003 6:45:09 AM PST by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson