Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Al-Qaeda planning US 'death blow'
Australia News ^ | Oct. 31, 2003 | Dubai correspondent -Agence France-Presse

Posted on 10/30/2003 11:17:40 AM PST by FairOpinion

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 341-350 next last
To: alpowolf
Nobody is advocating worrying about it, or being frightened by it. So far we have done a tremendous job of preventing and foiling the attacks, and hope we continue to do so.

But that doesn't mean that AQ isn't planning some very devastating attacks, and we can't relax in our WOT, that was my point. If we let down our guard, all it takes is for one attack to get through to cause death and devastation, not to mention killing the economy.
261 posted on 10/30/2003 1:55:07 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
And flight patterns around Logan have been screwy again.

SeaTac too.

262 posted on 10/30/2003 1:57:07 PM PST by tubavil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: PaulJ
"What about the first Trade Center bombing?"

Right, 1993. That's why I said between 1993 and 2001.
263 posted on 10/30/2003 2:00:10 PM PST by OneTimeLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
"Bottom line: the US military has the power under the law of war and the US Constitution to try, convict and execute any citizens of Iran, Syria, Yemin, Saudi Arabia, etc., who are involved in the attacks on our soldiers in Iraq. And we SHOULD do this, to send a very clear message to all those nations about their terrorists leaking into Iraq. If they get to Iraq and get involved in the attacks, with the weapons, explosives, maps and orders, they should be SHOT."

I agree! But, you left out citizens of Iraq. And by the way, what the hell is our military leadership giving command leadership at the front lines any crap about aggressively interrorgating an Iraqi about info he has about a planned attack on our troops!

As far as I'm concerned, that piece of garbage should have been shot right after he finally gave up the info. F*%king Washington, DC is going down the tubes with all the PC s#%t!

Let's get it right. These are our enemies and you don't coddle them. You kill them!

264 posted on 10/30/2003 2:00:23 PM PST by Spottys Spurs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Let's sing --- RAMA LAMA DING DONG
265 posted on 10/30/2003 2:00:34 PM PST by doug from upland (Why aren't the Clintons living out their remaining years on Alcatraz?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texasbluebell
Thanks for that...proves my point exactly
266 posted on 10/30/2003 2:03:12 PM PST by My Favorite Headache (I Want A Girlfriend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Angelus Errare
The last time he was bragging about attacks to this Saudi magazine, we got bombings in Riyadh, Casablanca, and Chechnya.

I think we have to take this warning seriously.

267 posted on 10/30/2003 2:11:22 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Militant Muslim gangleader inciting genocide ~ Bump!

Eradicate all terrorists ~ Now!
268 posted on 10/30/2003 2:11:44 PM PST by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
"Al-Qaeda planning US 'death blow'"

Bluster and bullsh*t.

If they had the means to launch an attack like this, they would have done so already.

There is either a shortage of virgin camels or this al-queda's towel's on too tight...
269 posted on 10/30/2003 2:12:47 PM PST by reagan_fanatic (Ain't Skeered...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I understand...I'm just saying that some people who seem unconcerned are not necessarily unaware or apathetic.
270 posted on 10/30/2003 2:12:51 PM PST by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj
Here's an idea -

"President Bush must first hold a public war trial in the United States, charging all terrorists, either by name or as John and Jane Doe, as being evil and condemning them to death. The terrorists, after all, condemned to death without a trial over 6.000 Americans in the Twin Towers terrorist attack."

"President Bush must tell any country harboring and protecting the terrorists that they are condemned to death and the U.S. demands their immediate extradition to carry out the death sentence. "

"Bush must tell any harboring country that if it refuses to turn over the terrorists it is collaterally guilty with the terrorists, and the United States will immediately drop the neutron bomb on it until it no longer exists as a nation."

"The United States will drop the neutron bomb on all nations that harbor terrorists. It is far cheaper and will cost far fewer lives of American troops than a ground war. Not one American soldier would be killed. The harboring country would be bombed as Japan was bombed. If Iraq or another terrorist-supporting country was bombed, the other harboring countries would get the message and oust all terrorists, leaving them nowhere to go. They would be turned over to the U.S. for carrying out the death sentence or cease to operate. Even if not turned over, they would have no home base to gather and plan future attacks, so they would be out of business. The Lucom Plan is the most competent, efficient way to end terrorism in a short time – wherever it exists. "

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/10/2/134539.shtml

271 posted on 10/30/2003 2:20:03 PM PST by Weimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: OneTimeLurker
Not that amazing considering that there were not attacks in the US between 1993 and 2001.

Not so sure about that. There was the assassination of CIA agents near Langley, some substantial (and as yet unrefuted) evidence of Islamic complicity in the Murrow Federal Building bombing, The EgyptAir pilot that intentionally augered his plane into the ocean off the coast of the US, and a not so slight amount of evidence that TWA800 might have been a terrorist attack. There were also a great deal of Islamic terrorist activity against )US interests" off shore during that time period.

272 posted on 10/30/2003 2:33:24 PM PST by spodefly (This is my tagline. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody; Dr. Eckleburg
If you were president and had the power - which terrorists would you attack or bomb, how and where?
273 posted on 10/30/2003 2:40:14 PM PST by M. Peach (eschew obsfucation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: spodefly
USS Cole - 2000.
274 posted on 10/30/2003 2:41:01 PM PST by tubavil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I am so sick of hearing Ramadamnadingdong called a "month of fasting!" They gorge themselves every night!
275 posted on 10/30/2003 2:52:26 PM PST by jonatron (If you'd like this message in English, press One. For Spanish, please hang up and try again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
Take it easy. We have taken out Afganistan and Iraq. Two years; two countries.
276 posted on 10/30/2003 2:55:31 PM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #277 Removed by Moderator

To: boxerblues
I have plenty of faith that our boys will carry out whatever is asked of them, but they have no decision-making power in such a thing. And I must differ on GWB: I think we could get hit with a dirty bomb or bioterror attack stateside and he wouldn't nuke anyone in response.

MM
278 posted on 10/30/2003 3:07:36 PM PST by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: M. Peach
You seem to confuse the actual active current group of terrorists with the "sea" in which they swim. The terrorists could not exist without a large amount of support, both active and tacit opinion in the Muslim world. And then there's a percentage of Muslims that don't believe in terrorism but are only a stone's throw away from being blinded by enough hate to condone such acts.

Even if the total is only 5-10 percent of the Muslim world(and I feel it's higher) you're dealing with MILLIONS.

You don't nuke the entire Muslim world, but you pick a few targets--Syria, border regions of Pakistan, Saudi, Iran and then launch.
279 posted on 10/30/2003 3:09:27 PM PST by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: boxerblues
We don't have the balls to do it. I agree with you, but "respected" "mainstream" people in Washington don't think that way. We think 21st century,enemies think 18th century. Bad news for us IMO.
280 posted on 10/30/2003 3:11:55 PM PST by Finalapproach29er ("Don't shoot Mongo, you'll only make him mad.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 341-350 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson