To: lifacs
The 16 year old should not have been out wandering the streets at 1230 am.
8 posted on
10/26/2003 5:03:58 AM PST by
alisasny
(No one is listening until you make a mistake.)
To: alisasny
The 16 year old should not have been out wandering the streets at 1230 am. Not a capital offense though. Negligent homicide at least. I feel bad for the homeowner but a lot worse for the kid and his family.
153 posted on
10/26/2003 8:05:50 AM PST by
paulsy
To: alisasny
You wrote:
"The 16 year old should not have been out wandering the streets at 1230 am. "
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
WOW!! And death is his penalty?!?!?
275 posted on
10/26/2003 1:55:24 PM PST by
Osage Orange
(Politicians favor unarmed citizens)
To: alisasny
The 16 year old should not have been out wandering the streets at 1230 am.
Does that make him 'fair game'? Of course not.
To: alisasny
The 16 year old should not have been out wandering the streets at 1230 am. It is well known that curfew violations carry the death penalty.
466 posted on
10/27/2003 8:23:25 AM PST by
Protagoras
(Hating Democrats doesn't make you a conservative.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson