To: alisasny
You wrote:
"The 16 year old should not have been out wandering the streets at 1230 am. "
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
WOW!! And death is his penalty?!?!?
275 posted on
10/26/2003 1:55:24 PM PST by
Osage Orange
(Politicians favor unarmed citizens)
To: Osage Orange
NO but my kid would have been home sleeping and not pulling such a stupid prank in todays day and age.
I guess you condone this behavior.
277 posted on
10/26/2003 1:57:41 PM PST by
alisasny
(No one is listening until you make a mistake.)
To: Osage Orange
Regarding my post 281
A question to you:
WOULD THE KID BE ALIVE TODAY IF HE WASN'T DOING SOME STUPID PRANK?
It really is that simple.
282 posted on
10/26/2003 2:13:07 PM PST by
alisasny
(No one is listening until you make a mistake.)
To: Osage Orange
She never said the kid deserved to die...I don't think anyone here said that. What many of us have been saying is that ultimately without the kid doing a dumb prank designed to annoy and harass, he would be alive.
285 posted on
10/26/2003 2:34:17 PM PST by
Pharmboy
(Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
To: Osage Orange
In some places in the world, curfew violators are shot on sight. The curfews are commonly far earlier than 12:30, local time.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson