Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teen pulling prank killed by neighbor
The Palm Beach Post ^ | Sunday, October 26 | Sarah Eisenhauer and Cynthia Kopkowski

Posted on 10/26/2003 4:41:29 AM PST by lifacs

Sunday, October 26

Teen pulling prank killed by neighbor

By Sarah Eisenhauer and Cynthia Kopkowski, Palm Beach Post Staff Writers Sunday, October 26, 2003

A birthday celebration capped off by an early-morning round of mischievous doorbell ringing ended in the death of a Boca Raton-area teenager early Saturday after a neighbor who believed his home was about to be burgled shot and killed the boy, deputies said.

Mark Andrew Drewes, a popular Pope John Paul II High School sophomore who celebrated his 16th birthday at a party Friday night, died from a single gunshot wound at Delray Medical Center. The shooting occurred shortly after 12:30 a.m. in the Woodbury neighborhood, a quiet, upper middle class neighborhood in the Boca Del Mar region.

The man who shot Drewes, Jay Steven Levin, 40, was not arrested, Palm Beach County sheriff's spokeswoman Diane Carhart said. Investigators questioned Levin at his home at 6115 Woodbury Road and collected evidence but did not take him into custody, Carhart said.

"He's a homeowner there," she said. "He was very cooperative."

The Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office will review the evidence and determine whether Levin's actions were justifiable self-defense or grounds for criminal charges, spokesman Mike Edmondson said.

When Levin, a Palm Beach County businessman who lived alone, was awakened from his sleep by a knock at the door early Saturday, he armed himself with a handgun and answered it, deputies said. He told deputies he saw someone he believed was holding a weapon.

Levin fired one shot, hitting Drewes, according to deputies. The boy ran into a neighbor's yard and collapsed.

"He feared for his life," Carhart said of Levin, adding that the teenager was 6-feet-2 and 210 pounds. "So he's a big 16-year-old."

Gathered at a family member's home Saturday morning, Drewes' relatives disputed Levin's self-defense claim and said they were furious that he was not arrested and charged with a crime Saturday.

"How can they call that self-defense?" said a family member who asked not to be identified. "If they thought it was a burglar, what kind of burglar knocks?"

The previous night, the large family and a bunch of friends had gathered at the house on Woodbury, where the Drewes have lived for about 10 years, for birthday cake. The teenager had been eagerly looking forward to three things: his 16th birthday, when he would be able to trade in his learner's driving permit for the real thing; the family party; and his school's homecoming dance Saturday.

"It was such a good day," said his grandmother Patricia Drewes, who drove from her Stuart home for the birthday party. "He was so happy. He told me it was the best day of his life."

Throughout the evening Friday, Drewes and his friends darted back and forth between his home and the fall festival at nearby St. Jude Catholic Church and school, where he graduated from eighth grade two years ago.

About 11:30 p.m., Drewes and a friend decided to go for a walk, family members said.

"They were playing knock on the door and run," said one family member. "They were being silly. They weren't bad kids."

Family members said the teen who was with Drewes told them he was not holding anything in his hand.

Investigators did not find a weapon on the victim, Carhart said. They confiscated Levin's handgun as evidence, she said.

Carhart said ringing doorbells and running is not generally considered to be a crime.

Family contends teen was shot in back

The sheriff's office would not release the name of the teenager who was with Drewes Saturday morning. Nor would it confirm the family's assertion that morgue officials told them Saturday afternoon that Drewes was shot in the back.

Carhart said the sheriff's office did not know when an autopsy was to take place.

A shirtless and red-eyed Levin answered the door to his neatly landscaped home Saturday morning, but said only, "I can't talk to you," in response to a reporter's questions.

State records show Levin ran his own business called Caxin Consulting Inc. from his home since 2001. He filed papers dissolving that corporation in August. Before that, he was listed as president of two other businesses, which are now inactive, the Halifax Group Inc. and L&L Accounting Inc.

Levin has a concealed weapons permit, according to state records.

He has lived at 6115 Woodbury, which has a market value of $195,000, since December 1996, according to county property appraiser records. It's on the next block from the Drewes home, several houses up the street.

Levin's doorbell was not the only one the boys rang Saturday morning. Residents up and down the 6100 block of Woodbury reported being awakened by ringing doorbells and knocks shortly after midnight. Most said they sloughed it off or answered the door, found nobody there and went back to bed. But a second round of frantic pounding and shouting from Drewes' friend minutes later caught their attention.

"It was pounding, pounding," said Lauren Hahn, one of several residents who talked to the boy through her front door, then called 911. "He said 'Call 911. My friend's been shot.' He was hysterical."

Droopy-eyed neighbors repeated the same story as they gathered Saturday morning in small groups up and down the block, some just a few yards away from blood stains where Drewes fell.

Carol Quiroga, who lives across the street from Levin, heard nothing outside as she made her way to bed minutes before the shooting -- no arguing, no scuffling. A loud "pop," broke the silence, followed by someone saying calmly, "Call 911" once, then again, she said. What sounded like a boy's voice came next, saying "Help. I need help."

She expressed the same disbelief shared by Drewes' family and several neighbors.

"What is so important that you are defending that you need a gun?" said Quiroga, the mother of two teenage boys, before breaking into tears.

"Teenage boys do things like that," she said.

Determining whether Levin's actions were protected by the state's self-defense laws now falls to State Attorney Barry Krischer's office. Someone can use force to protect his home if he think it's being burgled, Edmondson said, but it can only equal the force he's being threatened by.

And that law doesn't generally protect homeowners who use deadly force against someone coming into their yards or on their sidewalks, Edmondson said. That's considered trespassing.

"A trespass would not constitute a breach of someone's safety," he said.

If Krischer's office determines that Levin acted legally, the case is closed, Edmondson said. If the state attorney believes it was an unjustified killing, worthy of a second-degree murder charge or a lesser offense, he will charge Levin. If the evidence isn't clear-cut and could point to a first-degree murder charge, then Krischer will refer it to the grand jury, Edmondson said.

A man in Louisiana was cleared of wrongdoing in 1993 after he shot a Halloween-costumed Japanese exchange student knocking on his door looking for a party in 1992. He turned himself in after a grand jury had indicted him on charges of manslaughter in the killing of Yoshihiro Hattori of Nagoya, Japan. Hattori's friend testified in the trial that he was carrying a camera when they knocked on Rodney Peairs' door.

A shattered Drewes family Saturday described Mark as an A student and soccer player, the type of kid who easily made friends with just about everyone he met. More relatives from Brazil are expected to arrive today, along with Mark's father, Gregory, who is captain of a private yacht and was in France Saturday.

Many of Drewes' classmates would learn of his death at Pope John Paul II High's homecoming dance Saturday night, said the Rev. Guy Fiano, the school's president. Counselors were scheduled to be on hand at the dance and Monday at the school, a Catholic private school attended by 925 students, including 250 in Drewes' sophomore class. A prayer service is planned Monday for the "very well loved" student, Fiano said.

"It's very, very sad," he said. "I think it's going to be a very stressful week."

Student called 'very polite, very respectful'

Word began to spread Saturday morning through St. Jude's festival, a few blocks from where the shooting occurred. Standing amid the cotton candy vendors and whirling carnival rides, several attendees recalled the slain teenager as friendly and well-liked.

Classmate Danielle Denofa, 16, put her hand over her mouth and gasped when she heard the news.

"He was really nice," said Denofa, who attended YMCA teen camp with Drewes this summer. "I can't believe that happened."

Tracy McCarver, who taught Drewes math at St. Jude Catholic School, remembered him as a "very polite, very respectful" youngster with "a good sense of humor."

After this afternoon's youth Mass at St. Jude, members of his Life Teen group, a faith-based social organization, are expected to attend a special meeting, said Kevin Cleary, the church's religious education director and youth minister.

"Everyone's in a state of shock because of the senselessness of it," he said. "He was a boy's boy."

He called Drewes a "delightful" young man who could be relied on to help with every pancake breakfast, raffle and car wash that cropped up on his youth group's schedule. Before every Sunday night Life Teen meeting, Drewes was there setting up tables, Cleary said. When they ended, Drewes stayed to clean up.

"He was a beautiful, beautiful boy," said his aunt, Renata Piza. "He goes to church every week. He was so excited about turning 16."

Grandmother Drewes said he always greeted her on the phone by saying, "I love you, Nana."

"He's what you'd call the ideal son, just too good to be true," she said. "If there was some way I could understand this. It was so pointless."

sarah_eisenhauer@pbpost.com,cynthia_kopkowski@pbpost.com


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: banglist; concealed; dead; handgun; nosense; permit; poorkid; shot; trespass; weapons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 501-520 next last
To: Robert Drobot
The media is anti-gun, and have in all likelihood framed the story in a typical bigoted socialist mind-set.

Isn't it interesting that the reporters felt the need to publish the property value of the house? What sort of class hatred are they trying to stir up?

261 posted on 10/26/2003 12:18:24 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: lifacs
There has to be more to this story than is being told.
When you are doing a 'knock and run' at 12:30 AM why are you even still in SIGHT when someone answers the door?

Admittedly, the homeowner shouldn't be shooting someone without clear sight of the person but just WHAT was the kid still doing at the door.
Most of the time, at 12:30 at night, it will take a couple of minutes to answer the door. That gives the kids plenty of time to scoot and get gone.

There are things here that are not being told on one side or the other, or both sides, that would play into this case.

262 posted on 10/26/2003 12:20:21 PM PST by Just another Joe (FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
Ringing the bell and running is one thing when you are eight and it is daylight. It is quite another thing when you are adult sized, it is the middle of the night and you stick around waiting for the owner to come out.

Either they were incredibly inept at "ding-dong-ditch", or they were incredibly inept at "home invasion and burglarly".

Judging from the reaction of those who claimed to know him, I'm inclined to beleive the latter. Note that his "friends" here placed no responsibility with the perp, and totally blamed the homeowner (at least in the posts I've read). Also, they have made references to how popular and well-liked he was, which is irrelevant to the events of that night. Furthermore, they have made personal insults at those who disagreed with them. All this leads me to believe that you have a bunch of kids who think that society owes them something and that they can get away with anything.

However this situation turns out, Darwin appears to be the clear winner.

263 posted on 10/26/2003 12:23:22 PM PST by Mulder (Fight the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: lifacs; demlosers; Trickyguy
Darwinian selection.

Home invaders may knock.

If this "kid" was holding anything, or holding a hand behind his back bringing it forward, BOOM. Righteous shoot.

Sad given the facts after the fact, but righteous.

Stupid kids are usually under supervised by their parents. His parents will mourn and get angry, but probably at the wrong person.

Stupid pranks can have fatal outcomes.
264 posted on 10/26/2003 12:30:42 PM PST by SevenDaysInMay (Federal judges and justices serve for periods of good behavior, not life. Article III sec. 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HoustonCurmudgeon
A prayer service is planned Monday for the "very well loved" student, Fiano said.

I wonder how the school and students would be reacting if this were one of the school's unloved, unpopular students.

265 posted on 10/26/2003 12:30:53 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
Today, I don't care what the police are using. I'm using a 1911 with Hydra-Shoks. My son uses a 1911 with Gold Dots.

Those are two of my favorite rounds also. I've used the Winchester HPs also. It all comes down to personal choice. I'm of the belief that shot placement and caliber are 95% of the game. Whether or not you use FMJ or JHP is the other 4.9%, and what brand of JHP is about 0.1%. From what I've read, they all work about the same if the shooter does his/her part.

Anyway, you're bound to find at least one LE organization which uses the brand of defensive ammo that you use. So it's really a non-issue.

Preparing to survive and during a shooting, the least of your problem is worrying about what a jury will do.

Exactly. Situational awareness and threat avoidance is much more important than what ammo or what gun you're carrying. And if that doesn't work, then it comes down to weapon reliability, caliber, and shooter skill.

266 posted on 10/26/2003 12:30:59 PM PST by Mulder (Fight the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: m18436572
He was expecting a burgler, hence the gun.

No, he wasn't. Nobody answers the door for burglers. He probably thought that somebody needed help.

Unless there was a premeditated motivation to do so, say... it was the fifth time he had been awakened that night and now he was going to do something about it. No excuse there.

He should go to jail if that's what happened, but there's no hint of that in the story.

Mabey there is some other reason to answer the door with a gun in your hand?

Yes, there is. Some people always have their guns handy when they answer the door late at night as a safety precaution. None of them ever really expects to have to use it, but it makes them feel safe.

267 posted on 10/26/2003 12:31:14 PM PST by Frunabulax ("If the truth will kill them, let them die.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: joan
Drugs or alcohol could have played a part and impaired his judgement, made him paranoid, angry, etc. Notice how it mentions his eyes being red:

Do you really think the cops would have let him walk if he was obviously drunk or on drugs when he shot the kid?

268 posted on 10/26/2003 12:34:14 PM PST by Mulder (Fight the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
The problem I have with the book is it's out of date.

Hey, I kinda like the picture the guy with Colt Official Police and Elvis sideburns.

269 posted on 10/26/2003 12:37:51 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim (SSDD - Same S#it Different Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe
There has to be more to this story than is being told. When you are doing a 'knock and run' at 12:30 AM why are you even still in SIGHT when someone answers the door?

You have to hide nearby so that you can witness the bewildered or enraged antics of your victims. The trick is to make sure that they can't see YOU! That's where the failure occurred here.

Admittedly, the homeowner shouldn't be shooting someone without clear sight of the person but just WHAT was the kid still doing at the door.

He was probably in the shadows trying to stop himself from snickering. Criminals try to hide themselves, too, and they might not hold their fire long enough for you to be 100% sure they're not going to kill you.

Most of the time, at 12:30 at night, it will take a couple of minutes to answer the door. That gives the kids plenty of time to scoot and get gone.

Yes, you'd think he could have found a better hiding place.

270 posted on 10/26/2003 1:00:48 PM PST by Frunabulax ("If the truth will kill them, let them die.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
Thanks for your input. It is quite likely that the reason there was no immediate arrest is that it is the weekend, the autopsy hasn't been done yet, the shooter has no record and is not considered a flight risk. Nobody's saying the kid was small. He was tall and medium build. We will have to wait and see where exactly the evidence leads. Being close to the situation, I can only tell you what I know about the kids involved and the likely outcome. We're all very sad.
271 posted on 10/26/2003 1:05:43 PM PST by untwist (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe; elfman2
I rather spend my (short) time assessing a risk by determining a reasonable reason to shoot, rather than trying to think up a reasonable reason not to shoot. Juries have the luxury of time looking for reasonable doubt that a person in possible mortal fanger doesn't have.
272 posted on 10/26/2003 1:36:03 PM PST by stands2reason ("What you see at fight club is a generation of men raised by women." -- Chuck Palahniuk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: lifacs
Tragic incident. IIRC a similar shooting was in the news a few years ago involving a Japanese student (or exchange student) and a homeowner with a 44mag, on/near Halloween I think?? Except in that case there apparently, in fact, was no malicious intent on the part of the victim.

As has already been covered, antagonizing people at midnight on purpose is a hazardous endeavour, best avoided.

While the homeowner may be legally vindicated, killing someone who never intended you harm will be devastating psychologically - assuming reports of the victims "innocent prank" are accurate.

273 posted on 10/26/2003 1:44:33 PM PST by xsrdx (Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lifacs
From the piece:

""What is so important that you are defending that you need a gun?" said Quiroga"

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This lady is a fine Sheeple specimen.

274 posted on 10/26/2003 1:51:50 PM PST by Osage Orange (How come my Dad...never told me about the nose hair problem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alisasny
You wrote:

"The 16 year old should not have been out wandering the streets at 1230 am. "

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

WOW!! And death is his penalty?!?!?

275 posted on 10/26/2003 1:55:24 PM PST by Osage Orange (Politicians favor unarmed citizens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CGTRWK
Carhart said ringing doorbells and running is not generally considered to be a crime.

Stupidity is always a crime. The penalty is death.

The Universe does not exact the penalty in every instance. That's not a reason to roll the dice.

276 posted on 10/26/2003 1:56:49 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (You realize, of course, this means war?" B Bunny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange
NO but my kid would have been home sleeping and not pulling such a stupid prank in todays day and age.

I guess you condone this behavior.



277 posted on 10/26/2003 1:57:41 PM PST by alisasny (No one is listening until you make a mistake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: Lion Den Dan
Punk had no business doing what he was doing and banged on the wrong door. I agree and as usual he was a gem of a student and an ALTERBOY. Sorry, good kids are not wondering around annoying people at 1230 am. Also not enough info at this time and if the kid was shot in the back that is just plain wrong. However split second decisions do get made by everyone and I am not ready to judge the homeowner at this point who was minding his own business when he was rudely interrupted by another stupid kid trying to get some laughs.
278 posted on 10/26/2003 2:05:13 PM PST by alisasny (No one is listening until you make a mistake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: Let's Roll
Also what kind of burglar knocks or rings the bell? The kind who wants to be sure there's nobody home?

Well, I'll tell you from what seems like the "home invasion" capital of the world -- Eastside San Jose, I would have thought 'home invasion'.

That's actually not true, but it sure 'seems' like it from the newspaper reports I've read here in the last 5 years.

My first impulse would be to suspect a 'home invasion' type of effort assuming no one could be seen thru the peephole. I also live alone & have 'kicked myself' for answering the door late at night without checking first, but having been married, I've had a sense of security that actually isn't warranted, but is there none-the-less.

Getting a homeowner to step outside of the front door would seem like a common home invasion ploy, especially if played in the wee hours when the resident could be still half-asleep, like I usual have been when I answered the door.

I have to admit that pulling the trigger is another issue, but again it depends on threats, both real & perceived, that were received prior to this event.

279 posted on 10/26/2003 2:05:26 PM PST by all_mighty_dollar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: alisasny
Usually, but not always, events such as car accidents and this result from TWO individuals doing something wrong concomitantly.

Here, I think they were both at fault; however, the kid was the aggressor, Levin was in his own home minding his own business. Ultimately I agree with you: the kid should not have been out after midnight annoying people--you never know what frightened people will do to protect themselves.

Of course we need more facts, but I think the guy doesn't do time based on what I've read so far.

280 posted on 10/26/2003 2:06:15 PM PST by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 501-520 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson