Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teen pulling prank killed by neighbor
The Palm Beach Post ^ | Sunday, October 26 | Sarah Eisenhauer and Cynthia Kopkowski

Posted on 10/26/2003 4:41:29 AM PST by lifacs

Sunday, October 26

Teen pulling prank killed by neighbor

By Sarah Eisenhauer and Cynthia Kopkowski, Palm Beach Post Staff Writers Sunday, October 26, 2003

A birthday celebration capped off by an early-morning round of mischievous doorbell ringing ended in the death of a Boca Raton-area teenager early Saturday after a neighbor who believed his home was about to be burgled shot and killed the boy, deputies said.

Mark Andrew Drewes, a popular Pope John Paul II High School sophomore who celebrated his 16th birthday at a party Friday night, died from a single gunshot wound at Delray Medical Center. The shooting occurred shortly after 12:30 a.m. in the Woodbury neighborhood, a quiet, upper middle class neighborhood in the Boca Del Mar region.

The man who shot Drewes, Jay Steven Levin, 40, was not arrested, Palm Beach County sheriff's spokeswoman Diane Carhart said. Investigators questioned Levin at his home at 6115 Woodbury Road and collected evidence but did not take him into custody, Carhart said.

"He's a homeowner there," she said. "He was very cooperative."

The Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office will review the evidence and determine whether Levin's actions were justifiable self-defense or grounds for criminal charges, spokesman Mike Edmondson said.

When Levin, a Palm Beach County businessman who lived alone, was awakened from his sleep by a knock at the door early Saturday, he armed himself with a handgun and answered it, deputies said. He told deputies he saw someone he believed was holding a weapon.

Levin fired one shot, hitting Drewes, according to deputies. The boy ran into a neighbor's yard and collapsed.

"He feared for his life," Carhart said of Levin, adding that the teenager was 6-feet-2 and 210 pounds. "So he's a big 16-year-old."

Gathered at a family member's home Saturday morning, Drewes' relatives disputed Levin's self-defense claim and said they were furious that he was not arrested and charged with a crime Saturday.

"How can they call that self-defense?" said a family member who asked not to be identified. "If they thought it was a burglar, what kind of burglar knocks?"

The previous night, the large family and a bunch of friends had gathered at the house on Woodbury, where the Drewes have lived for about 10 years, for birthday cake. The teenager had been eagerly looking forward to three things: his 16th birthday, when he would be able to trade in his learner's driving permit for the real thing; the family party; and his school's homecoming dance Saturday.

"It was such a good day," said his grandmother Patricia Drewes, who drove from her Stuart home for the birthday party. "He was so happy. He told me it was the best day of his life."

Throughout the evening Friday, Drewes and his friends darted back and forth between his home and the fall festival at nearby St. Jude Catholic Church and school, where he graduated from eighth grade two years ago.

About 11:30 p.m., Drewes and a friend decided to go for a walk, family members said.

"They were playing knock on the door and run," said one family member. "They were being silly. They weren't bad kids."

Family members said the teen who was with Drewes told them he was not holding anything in his hand.

Investigators did not find a weapon on the victim, Carhart said. They confiscated Levin's handgun as evidence, she said.

Carhart said ringing doorbells and running is not generally considered to be a crime.

Family contends teen was shot in back

The sheriff's office would not release the name of the teenager who was with Drewes Saturday morning. Nor would it confirm the family's assertion that morgue officials told them Saturday afternoon that Drewes was shot in the back.

Carhart said the sheriff's office did not know when an autopsy was to take place.

A shirtless and red-eyed Levin answered the door to his neatly landscaped home Saturday morning, but said only, "I can't talk to you," in response to a reporter's questions.

State records show Levin ran his own business called Caxin Consulting Inc. from his home since 2001. He filed papers dissolving that corporation in August. Before that, he was listed as president of two other businesses, which are now inactive, the Halifax Group Inc. and L&L Accounting Inc.

Levin has a concealed weapons permit, according to state records.

He has lived at 6115 Woodbury, which has a market value of $195,000, since December 1996, according to county property appraiser records. It's on the next block from the Drewes home, several houses up the street.

Levin's doorbell was not the only one the boys rang Saturday morning. Residents up and down the 6100 block of Woodbury reported being awakened by ringing doorbells and knocks shortly after midnight. Most said they sloughed it off or answered the door, found nobody there and went back to bed. But a second round of frantic pounding and shouting from Drewes' friend minutes later caught their attention.

"It was pounding, pounding," said Lauren Hahn, one of several residents who talked to the boy through her front door, then called 911. "He said 'Call 911. My friend's been shot.' He was hysterical."

Droopy-eyed neighbors repeated the same story as they gathered Saturday morning in small groups up and down the block, some just a few yards away from blood stains where Drewes fell.

Carol Quiroga, who lives across the street from Levin, heard nothing outside as she made her way to bed minutes before the shooting -- no arguing, no scuffling. A loud "pop," broke the silence, followed by someone saying calmly, "Call 911" once, then again, she said. What sounded like a boy's voice came next, saying "Help. I need help."

She expressed the same disbelief shared by Drewes' family and several neighbors.

"What is so important that you are defending that you need a gun?" said Quiroga, the mother of two teenage boys, before breaking into tears.

"Teenage boys do things like that," she said.

Determining whether Levin's actions were protected by the state's self-defense laws now falls to State Attorney Barry Krischer's office. Someone can use force to protect his home if he think it's being burgled, Edmondson said, but it can only equal the force he's being threatened by.

And that law doesn't generally protect homeowners who use deadly force against someone coming into their yards or on their sidewalks, Edmondson said. That's considered trespassing.

"A trespass would not constitute a breach of someone's safety," he said.

If Krischer's office determines that Levin acted legally, the case is closed, Edmondson said. If the state attorney believes it was an unjustified killing, worthy of a second-degree murder charge or a lesser offense, he will charge Levin. If the evidence isn't clear-cut and could point to a first-degree murder charge, then Krischer will refer it to the grand jury, Edmondson said.

A man in Louisiana was cleared of wrongdoing in 1993 after he shot a Halloween-costumed Japanese exchange student knocking on his door looking for a party in 1992. He turned himself in after a grand jury had indicted him on charges of manslaughter in the killing of Yoshihiro Hattori of Nagoya, Japan. Hattori's friend testified in the trial that he was carrying a camera when they knocked on Rodney Peairs' door.

A shattered Drewes family Saturday described Mark as an A student and soccer player, the type of kid who easily made friends with just about everyone he met. More relatives from Brazil are expected to arrive today, along with Mark's father, Gregory, who is captain of a private yacht and was in France Saturday.

Many of Drewes' classmates would learn of his death at Pope John Paul II High's homecoming dance Saturday night, said the Rev. Guy Fiano, the school's president. Counselors were scheduled to be on hand at the dance and Monday at the school, a Catholic private school attended by 925 students, including 250 in Drewes' sophomore class. A prayer service is planned Monday for the "very well loved" student, Fiano said.

"It's very, very sad," he said. "I think it's going to be a very stressful week."

Student called 'very polite, very respectful'

Word began to spread Saturday morning through St. Jude's festival, a few blocks from where the shooting occurred. Standing amid the cotton candy vendors and whirling carnival rides, several attendees recalled the slain teenager as friendly and well-liked.

Classmate Danielle Denofa, 16, put her hand over her mouth and gasped when she heard the news.

"He was really nice," said Denofa, who attended YMCA teen camp with Drewes this summer. "I can't believe that happened."

Tracy McCarver, who taught Drewes math at St. Jude Catholic School, remembered him as a "very polite, very respectful" youngster with "a good sense of humor."

After this afternoon's youth Mass at St. Jude, members of his Life Teen group, a faith-based social organization, are expected to attend a special meeting, said Kevin Cleary, the church's religious education director and youth minister.

"Everyone's in a state of shock because of the senselessness of it," he said. "He was a boy's boy."

He called Drewes a "delightful" young man who could be relied on to help with every pancake breakfast, raffle and car wash that cropped up on his youth group's schedule. Before every Sunday night Life Teen meeting, Drewes was there setting up tables, Cleary said. When they ended, Drewes stayed to clean up.

"He was a beautiful, beautiful boy," said his aunt, Renata Piza. "He goes to church every week. He was so excited about turning 16."

Grandmother Drewes said he always greeted her on the phone by saying, "I love you, Nana."

"He's what you'd call the ideal son, just too good to be true," she said. "If there was some way I could understand this. It was so pointless."

sarah_eisenhauer@pbpost.com,cynthia_kopkowski@pbpost.com


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: banglist; concealed; dead; handgun; nosense; permit; poorkid; shot; trespass; weapons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 501-520 next last
To: lifacs
"How can they call that self-defense?" said a family member who asked not to be identified. "If they thought it was a burglar, what kind of burglar knocks?"

I don't think this guy should have fired his gun at a door knocker. What say you?

At 12:30am, if you are protecting yourself or your family you don't take any chances, sorry. That split second of warning instead of acting is all a potential attacker needs to take you (him) out and run inside and rape your (his) wife and children.

41 posted on 10/26/2003 6:00:49 AM PST by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOBWADE
"Best to leave this one up to people with all of the facts."

Like the shot in the back?

42 posted on 10/26/2003 6:02:08 AM PST by G.Mason (Lessons of life need not be fatal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
sorry but the kids bad judgment is not reason to make the home owner guilty. This is the Palm (we want a revote 2000) Beach Post.

The kid intended to create an apprehension of harm to the homeowner. That apprehesion is enough for the homeowner. This is no different than if the kid used an unloaded gun. There is no way for the homeowner to know.

The prosecutor's office would be stupid to bring this case because the kid will be put on trial. Then again the palm beach juries found a gun make liable, and then after it was overturned ended up saddling the widow with a million dollar legal bill. Look for the same anti-gun lawyer vultures to decend. (BTW many of those same lawyers have CCW)
43 posted on 10/26/2003 6:03:42 AM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Flyer
Taking a gun to the door is wise. It's what happens next that makes all the difference. A lot of things can bring a knock on the door late at night. Some are threats and some are real emergencies requiring assistance.

One night my wife and I heard a car hit a tree outside. We actually ran out into the night and found a young couple needing help. They were not hurt and it turned out I knew the girl's father. We gave them a ride home.

44 posted on 10/26/2003 6:04:12 AM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Normal4me
Anyone else find it odd that a high school is named after Pope John Paul II?

Since it's Catholic, not really.

45 posted on 10/26/2003 6:05:02 AM PST by BlessedBeGod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freep_toad
" Plain and simply, we do not know all the facts, yet.
Do we know if the kid was actually holding something in his hand(s)? No.
Do we know if words were exchanged between the two? No
Had the resident's home been burglarized in the recent past? We do not know."

After I got out to the Marines I had to drive across county twice with everything I owned in my car, sometimes sleeping in it. While on the highway, where anyone who bothered me would likely kill me, I slept with a loaded pistol. While sleeping in residential neighborhoods or parking lots, I put the gun in the trunk. I wasn’t going to blow away what was much more likely to be a small time thief or a kid misbehaving.

Depending on what was said/threatened by the dead kid, the homeowner may be technically within his rights. But even if the kid yelled “boo” of laugh maniacally, that’s not an immanent threat to the gun owner. Pranks happen. When taking on the responsibility of judge and jury, he should know that.

I don’t know the law here. What makes sense is that the same criteria for sentencing a person to death in court should apply to shooting someone in your home. I don’t think that it’s self defense if the odds are just 50/50 or even 90/10 that this was just a prank. I think that the shooter needs to be able to demonstrate that there was an immanent threat to his life or property beyond reasonable doubt. Otherwise, I think that the benefit of the doubt should run against him, and he should be made an example of to people who have no business owning guns.

46 posted on 10/26/2003 6:06:28 AM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
palm beach post, no way this is the whole story.

their staff still says SElected not Election.
47 posted on 10/26/2003 6:07:11 AM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: laredo44
The kid rang the bell and stood there waiting for someone to answer. That doesn't jibe with "playing knock on the door and run".

And if he was just standing there, how on earth did he get shot in the back? Too many questions.

48 posted on 10/26/2003 6:07:25 AM PST by BlessedBeGod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth
"Apparently, both the shooter and the deceased had bad judgement. "

Correct. But the shooter was an adult, and he is still alive to deal with the consequences of his brainless act.

His property, whatever it is, will go to pay legal fees and a civil judgement. Based on the info about his businesses I wouldn't want to be this guy's creditor. I hope this guy spends the rest of his life making payments on the judgement or restitution order.
49 posted on 10/26/2003 6:09:04 AM PST by SBprone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: JZoback; archy
Part of the responsibility of owning a gun is the training when to use it.

Shooting someone in the back while fleeing is illegal

I agree. But you will find that some posters on FR believe that training is "infringement" and think the poor kid got what he deserved. Sad.

50 posted on 10/26/2003 6:09:15 AM PST by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
This will lead to a decrease in such juvenile pranks and real home invasion robberies.
51 posted on 10/26/2003 6:09:30 AM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BOBWADE
I'm in Florida... am a Texan,

I think the homeowner is screwed. The guy should not answer the door if he was in fear and should have called 911 with a gun trained on the door in case the kid had tried to get in.

I don't know if you have the obligation to "retreat" vs some states that you can "stand your ground". Once your domicile is "invaded" then all bets are off. I think it depends on where the boundaries are drawn legally. What might have happened is that he answered and the guy came out and frightened him with an "accidental" dishcharge.(if the guy had his finger on the trigger). Forensics will come out in the trial. If the guy was pissed and shot the kid for waking him up.... well I'm thinking the guy should get a good lawyer. He'll need it.

I'm sure that the local bloodsucker has contacted the kids parents and are looking at the homeowner's umbrella liability policy to "ease their pain" and ...... line his pockets with a little 35-40% of the "take". Bottom line, is that night is going to be the worst one of his life. Killing a kid and ruining a bunch of lives. Really is kind of a sad story........

I have a CCW permit and that actuall puts more responsibilities on you than most liberals think. Especially if you are concientious and law abiding.

52 posted on 10/26/2003 6:09:38 AM PST by Dick Vomer (Liberals suck...... but it depends on what you mean by the word "suck".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
...and he should be made an example of to people who have no business owning guns.

You must be thinking of a country that has no 2nd Amendment. Who are these "people that have no business owning guns" besides criminals who have had their constitutional rights aborted?

53 posted on 10/26/2003 6:12:16 AM PST by JoeSixPack1 (POW/MIA Bring 'em Home, Or Send us Back!! Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
You are correct. As a gun owner and a CCW for 20 years, that has to be the philosophy.

That being said, when you invade people's space with aggressive behavior for "fun" things like this will sometimes occur. That kid was not brought up right...I'm also guessing he was a bully.

54 posted on 10/26/2003 6:13:09 AM PST by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: elbucko
was he fleeing? Was it lit? Was he turning to flee or was he reaching for a weapon? Did this kid have anything which could be mistaken for a gun/weapon? Was it a ring of the doorbell? Banging on the door? Did the kid say anything? (let me in NOW!) This article's information is incomplete.

Keep in mind too, the police did not take this man into custody. There is clearly more to this story than in the leftist palm beach post.

55 posted on 10/26/2003 6:14:41 AM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: lifacs
There has to be more to this.

Let's see: 16 year old "kids" (who should know better) are "playing" "knock on the door and run" in the middle of the night.

The homeowner is sound asleep (or even if he isn't). He hears the knock, thinks for a moment, what is this? He gets his gun, walks to the door and opens it (poor judgment on his part, you don't open the door at midnight to any knocks).

BUT THE MAIN POINT: WHY IS THE "KID" STILL AT THE DOOR.
If he really just "knocked and ran" he would be two houses over by now, and when the homeowner opens the door, there wouldn't be anyone there.

The teenager was big, as the article said: 6'2", 210 lbs. These days there are a whole lot of violent crimes committed by teenagers. Many crimes are indeed committed by knocking, then when the homeowner opens the door, pushing their way in, and robbing the house, usually violently attacking the homeowner as well, even killing him.

As I said, the homeowner should not have opened the door, he should have sat facing the door with his gun, and if somone is breaking in, then shoot them. But once he opens the door in the middle of the night and find a huge guy 6'2", 210 lbs., standing there, maybe menacingly, maybe even trying to push his way in, what would anyone think, except that whoever is standing there is up to no good. Remember this is the middle of the night.

The article only presented ONE point of view, that of the "teenagers". Do "good kids" go around knocking on doors at midnight? How do we know they weren't trying to push their way into the house? Why was the teenager still standing at the door a minute or two later, when the homeowner answered the door, if he was just "knocking and running"?
56 posted on 10/26/2003 6:16:54 AM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laredo44
Beyond that, something else doesn't add up about this report. The kid rang the bell and stood there waiting for someone to answer. That doesn't jibe with "playing knock on the door and run". Even other neighbors/prank victims reported they "found nobody there".

Coupled with the homeowener saying he saw someone he believed was holding a weapon and I agree with you.

I wonder if it was just a shadow or if the kid actually had something in his hand.

If he did then that changes everything.

57 posted on 10/26/2003 6:17:44 AM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Maybe I should cut back on the coffee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JoeSixPack1
"You must be thinking of a country that has no 2nd Amendment. Who are these "people that have no business owning guns" besides criminals who have had their constitutional rights aborted?"

Try to control your jerking knee. Who said people have any business doing everything that they have a right to do. Do you have any business providing for 15 kids, owning an endangered species, managing a hospital, etc… If your think everyone’s currently able to responsibly managing a weapon, you don’t know people.

58 posted on 10/26/2003 6:19:04 AM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: lifacs
If the guy feared a burglar, why did he open the door?
59 posted on 10/26/2003 6:19:33 AM PST by Sloth ("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
sounds more like the kid had bad judgement to me
60 posted on 10/26/2003 6:19:49 AM PST by cajun-jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 501-520 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson