Skip to comments.
Study suggests life sprang from clay
cnn ^
Posted on 10/25/2003 5:01:26 PM PDT by chance33_98
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:03:18 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- Science backed up religion this week in a study that suggests life may have indeed sprung from clay -- just as many faiths teach.
A team at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston said they had shown materials in clay were key to some of the initial processes in forming life.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: creation; genesis; origins; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: chance33_98
Kudos to CNN for acknowledging the existence of the Bible. Now, where did they manage to find a copy? It must have been difficult for them.
2
posted on
10/25/2003 5:05:07 PM PDT
by
nwrep
To: nwrep
Google.
3
posted on
10/25/2003 5:08:03 PM PDT
by
PoorMuttly
(Muttly Axiom #4..."Squirrels are nuts !")
To: chance33_98
Gosh...I hope this doesn't turn into a crevo thread.
To: eddie willers
I don't spend much time pondering where we came from, more interested in where we are going :)
5
posted on
10/25/2003 5:11:06 PM PDT
by
chance33_98
(This message will self destruct in 5 seconds)
To: chance33_98
To: chance33_98
I beleive it!
Jesus said He is the Potter and we are the clay.
To: nwrep
The Gideons probably left one in the lobby recently. Ted Turner hasn't had a chance to find it and throw it away...or at Jane.
8
posted on
10/25/2003 5:38:41 PM PDT
by
aardvark1
To: chance33_98
cool!
9
posted on
10/25/2003 5:40:02 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(Please visit www.geocities.com/geronl)
To: chance33_98
SPOTREP - YEC ALERT
To: chance33_98
All your smectites are belong to us.
11
posted on
10/25/2003 5:57:39 PM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: chance33_98
I've always known that.
To: chance33_98
"We are not claiming that this is how life started," Szostak stressed.
"We are saying that we have demonstrated growth and division without any biochemical machinery. Ultimately, if we can demonstrate more natural ways this might have happened, it may begin to give us clues about how life could have actually gotten started on the primitive Earth."
Reading the actually study, the way they got "growth and division" was to force the bubbles through tiny holes and then pinch them off. That is not even close to natural cell division. How much money did they get to prove you can pinch one bubble into two, and grow a bubble by lowering pressure outside/raising it inside?
They are even wrong on the claim that they got division and growth "without any biochemical machinary." The scientists themselves were the biochemical machinary.
13
posted on
10/25/2003 6:02:15 PM PDT
by
Ahban
To: chance33_98
" helps form little bags of fat Fat? From clay? Clay with no biotic material already in it? I doubt it.
15
posted on
10/25/2003 6:07:22 PM PDT
by
Consort
To: chance33_98
""We are not claiming that this is how life started," Szostak stressed. Oh, now I get it. The headline is supposed to read:
"Study Doesn't Suggest Life Sprang from Clay"
To: chance33_98
Nah, can't be ;)
The godless evolution crowd believes we evolved form something - like aardvarks. LOL!
Of course God created as just as He said.
17
posted on
10/25/2003 6:18:22 PM PDT
by
nmh
To: chance33_98
I don't spend much time pondering where we came from, more interested in where we are going :)This reminds me of a philosophical question I once heard. "If you could learn where we came from, or what our ultimate achievement will be - but you could only learn one of the two - which would you choose to learn?"
To: nmh
If this research was as valid as the headline so optimistically proclaims, it points directly to evolution.
To: nmh
It doesn't take much for the athiests to come crawling out of their dark pit. I guess they think they have to quickly put down the truth before someone believes it. How juvinile of them.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson