Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Constitutional showdown brewing over Terri's law
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | October 24, 2003 | Diana Lynne

Posted on 10/24/2003 5:57:14 PM PDT by joesnuffy

MATTERS OF LIFE AND DEATH Constitutional showdown brewing over Terri's Law Husband's attorney expects Florida Supremes to rule on intervention by legislators, Jeb Bush

Posted: October 24, 2003 3:40 p.m. Eastern

By Diana Lynne © 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

The Florida Supreme Court will be asked next week to consider the constitutionality of Terri's Law, the emergency measure passed by Florida lawmakers to empower Gov. Jeb Bush to order the feeding tube reinserted into Terri Schindler-Schiavo.

No strangers to national controversy, the justices are at once credited and condemned for rulings that ultimately determined the outcome of the 2000 presidential election between Democrat candidate Al Gore and Republican George W. Bush.

Now it's the governing power of Bush's brother, Jeb, that could face scrutiny by the state's high court, as attorney George Felos, who represents Terri's husband, Michael Schiavo, announces intentions to bring their case before the court. Justices have already rejected three motions related to the case.

Felos, who calls Terri's Law "absurdly unconstitutional," believes he can get a challenge before the court in three weeks. He has already mounted a challenge to the law in circuit court in Clearwater, Fla.

"Individuals have a right to control their own body and the right to choose what medical treatment they want and what medical treatment they don't want," Felos previously told WorldNetDaily. "If you've made the decision that medical treatment is no longer a benefit for you and you don't want it, then you do have the legal and constitutional right to refuse it. And I'm an advocate of allowing people to enforce that right."

The right-to-die advocate held a press conference yesterday to counter the rising tide of public outcry against his client's efforts to end Terri's life. The governor's office said it has received more than 165,000 e-mails and thousands of calls in support of Terri and Bush's intervention on her behalf.

"There's a lot of angry people out there over what happened to Terri, and what was done to Terri: being literally, under threat of arrest, yanked from her deathbed and her death process," Felos told reporters at the press conference , according to WFTS. "Just in the last two days, I have received scores of e-mails and calls of outrage over this act. Many people have contacted us offering support, both material and in other ways."

Defending Michael Schiavo against speculation over his motives for wanting his wife dead, Felos insisted he was acting out of love and respect for his wife's desire to "die with dignity."

"Who in God's name would subject themselves to what he has gone through for any other reason?" he said. "He always deeply loved her."

Felos said there was no life insurance policy on Terri and Michael Schiavo would not otherwise benefit financially from his wife's death.

WorldNetDaily has reported Michael Schiavo won more than $1.2 million in 1992 that was to be earmarked for Terri's care and therapy but was never spent for that purpose.

Felos told reporters yesterday the sum in Terri's trust fund had been whittled down to $55,000. While he and Michael Schiavo's other attorney, Deborah Bushnell, say they haven't been paid in over a year, Felos was previously paid $358,434 out of the fund. Bushnell told the St. Petersburg Times she had been paid approximately $80,000 from the fund.

In a move that horrified Terri's family last year, Bushnell also filed a petition with probate Judge George Greer seeking authorization of pre-payment for Terri's cremation and burial expenses out of the fund.

Pat Anderson, the attorney representing Terri's parents, Robert and Mary Schindler, has filed multiple petitions seeking the removal of Michael Schiavo as Terri's guardian and chief decision maker. Among her arguments, she claims Michael Schiavo misspent the medical funds.

"While exhausting Terri's money for the purpose of killing her, not one red cent could be found by Schiavo to enhance the quality of her life after receipt of the malpractice award. ... [A]nd the expenditure of nothing for therapy that would reduce the pain of contractures, enhance Terri’s ability to swallow, or facilitate recovery of basic abilities is the grossest form of asset mismanagement," Anderson stated in a petition filed and rejected by Greer last November.

WorldNetDaily has reported Terri sustained brain damage when she mysteriously collapsed in 1990 at the age of 26 and oxygen was cut to her brain for several minutes. The Schindlers have been fighting with their son-in-law for 10 years over the fate of their daughter. He contends his wife is in a persistent vegetative state and told him once she would not want to be kept alive artificially. The Schindlers argue Terri is alert, responsive and vocalizes and maintain she wants to live. She has no written directive on the matter.

Constitutional showdown

In an historic move earlier this week, Florida lawmakers crafted a narrowly worded measure that authorized Bush to issue "a one-time stay to prevent the withholding of nutrition and hydration from a patient" who meets criteria, which apply to Terri.

Some legal scholars agree with Felos and believe the legislators and the governor overstepped their bounds in defying the judicial system. They predict the intervention will spark a constitutional showdown.

"Courts get to decide particular cases, not legislatures," Steven Gey, a law professor at Florida State University, told the New York Times.

In 1995, the Supreme Court ruled Congress was prohibited from reopening final court decisions under the separation-of-powers doctrine.

Gey said Florida's separation-of-powers law is "more rigid" than federal law.

Other scholars wonder whether the law encroaches on Michael Schiavo's constitutional right to privacy.

Still others ask about Terri's rights as a brain-disabled woman who can't speak for herself.

WorldNetDaily reported constitutional expert Herb Titus maintains Bush had a legal obligation to use his executive powers to halt Terri's death.

"Not only does the governor have such power, but the governor has the constitutional duty to prevent any action taken pursuant to such a court order, because such action would violate Ms. Schindler-Schiavo's constitutionally guaranteed 'inalienable right to enjoy and defend life' regardless of her 'physical disability' as secured by Article 1 Section 2 of the Florida State Constitution," Titus, of Chesapeake, Va., wrote in a memorandum faxed to the governor's legal office last week.

Titus represents suspended Chief Justice Roy Moore in his battle over the 10 Commandments monument in Montgomery, Ala.

Attorney Richard Thompson, who heads the Thomas More Law Center, a public-interest law firm in Ann Arbor, Mich., noted in an emergency letter sent to Bush the night Terri's feeding tube was pulled that Terri is "a victim of abuse and neglect," and under Florida law, "it is a crime to abuse or neglect a disabled adult" and to encourage another person to do so.

Thompson called on Bush to launch a full-scale criminal investigation into the circumstances of the case "and to take measures to prevent future harm to Ms. Schiavo pending the outcome of the investigation."

In August, the Schindlers filed a federal lawsuit alleging Michael Schiavo and Felos "combined and conspired to deprive Terri of her constitutional and civil rights."

The 24-page complaint alleged Michael Schiavo had forbidden medical professionals to provide his wife with any therapy or rehabilitation and had even attempted to hasten her death while she was a patient at the Pinellas Park, Fla., hospice he placed her in three years ago.

In a sworn affidavit, Carla Sauer Iyer, a registered nurse who cared for Terri from April 1995 until August of 1996 when she was fired after notifying the police about the case, stated Terri used to talk to her as much as she could and frequently used what sounded like the word "pain." She also interpreted Terri's vocalizing at times as crying "help me."

While acknowledging she had no proof, Iyer said she suspects Michael Schiavo injected Terri, who normally has "very stable" blood sugar levels, with regular insulin to drive her into hypoglycemic shock during his visits.

"Terri would be trembling, crying hysterically and would be very pale and have cold sweats," Iyer wrote. "So I'd check her blood sugar. The glucometer reading would be so low that it was below the range where it would register an actual number reading."

Schiavo has repeatedly and strenuously denied allegations of abuse. Felos described the accusations as "a bunch of garbage." He called caregivers' claims Terri spoke to them "a fabrication."

Updates and other information about Terri's fight for life are posted on the family's website.

Previous stories:

Terri snatched from hospital

Terri lives!

Florida legislators move to rescue Terri

Will 'Terri's Bill' save her life now?

Terri Schiavo denied Last Rites

Gov. Bush 'fails' Terri

Abuse report filed for Terri

Desperate parents petition High Court

Lawyers: Bush can step in for Terri

Starvation begins for Terri Schiavo

Husband protests video showing alert Terri

Terri Schiavo wants to live

No intervention for Schiavo

Joni Eareckson Tada joins vigil for Terri Schiavo

Federal judge says Terri Schiavo must die

Hearing today on woman scheduled to starve

Prayer vigil for Terri Schiavo

Bush steps in for Schindler-Schiavo

Florida AG intervenes in Schiavo lawsuit

Order signed for starvation of disabled woman

Disabled woman wins reprieve

Another 9-11 date with death

Federal judge considers Schiavo case

Federal Court grants emergency hearing in Schiavo case

Attorney: Jeb Bush letter only a 'good first step'

Gov. Bush's plea for Schindler-Schiavo rejected

Jeb Bush intervenes for Schindler-Schiavo

Legal setbacks clear way for Schiavo starvation

Schindler-Schiavo on 'death row'

Husband bars priest from brain-damaged wife

Brain-damaged woman hospitalized

Fight for life bombshell: Terri trying to talk

Petition drive launched for Terri Schiavo

Diana Lynne is a news editor for WorldNetDaily.com.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: euthanasia; florida; jebbush; michaelschiavo; prodeath; prolife; schiendler; supremecourt; terrischiavo; terrrislaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 10/24/2003 5:57:14 PM PDT by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
If someone knows, I haven't seen why there was a malpractice suit and such a huge award of money in what appears to have happened at home.

Is there info out there on this?
2 posted on 10/24/2003 6:06:54 PM PDT by LaraCroft (Ping a ding ding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
"Individuals have a right to control their own body and the right to choose what medical treatment they want and what medical treatment they don't want,"

Apparently Felos doesn't believe in uniform application of the laws - Thanks to her husbands' refusal to rehabilitate Terri, she may never have a say in the matter.

3 posted on 10/24/2003 6:09:20 PM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
Well, the SCOFLAws are the last people I want to see this case go to, but I suppose it's inevitable. Let's hope they decide it's not worth their while to intervene and further offend the Florida legislators, because if they do I'm not sure that SCOTUS will want to take the case.
4 posted on 10/24/2003 6:38:16 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
If a Governor has the power to grant a 'stay of execution'
over a Judicial act that chooses to kill a murderer...

then it stands to reason a Governor ALSO has the power
to grant a 'stay of execution' over a Judicial act that chooses to kill a disabled person when there are still
other care givers wishing to take care of her.
5 posted on 10/24/2003 7:29:02 PM PDT by Future Useless Eater (Freedom_Loving_Engineer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
And I'm an advocate of allowing people to enforce that right."

Of allowing people to enforce that right? How about allowing people to force that right on others?

"Courts get to decide particular cases, not legislatures," Steven Gey, a law professor at Florida State University, told the New York Times.

Courts get to decide cases based on laws passed by the legislatures. It seems to me that the FL legislature just passed a law. The courts are to uphold it.

Becki

6 posted on 10/24/2003 7:39:45 PM PDT by Becki (Pray continually for our leaders and our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FL_engineer
Excellent point! And an execution is exactly what is being attempted, IMO.
7 posted on 10/24/2003 7:47:09 PM PDT by JusPasenThru (We're through being cool (you can say that again, Dad))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
At some point in the future, federal or state judges are going to push people and the two other branches of government too far and there will be major reductions in judicial power.
8 posted on 10/24/2003 7:49:08 PM PDT by alternatives?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken522
RE: uniform application of laws (see Code of Ethics
for Government Service Public Law 96-303
http://www.houstonprogressive.org/ethics.html for standards
by which I would hold lawyers as officer of the court)

Other contradictions in this case include:
(1) demanding the "right to privacy" while invading that of Terri and her family
(2) defending "religious freedom" to pursue the "right to die" but denying the same of family to pursue the right to live
(3) Michael Schiavo moving from his home to escape death threats, while leaving Terri guarded in a hospice, unable to escape threats to her own life
(4) and now arguing the Governor acted "unconstitutionally" yet abusing the judicial system to impose unconstitutional orders - not only abridging the family's free exercise of religion, but their right peaceably to assemble and to petition for redress of grievances. Only because the Governor and Legislature intervened, did they save the family's First Amendment rights from total annihilation.

Because the family's right to petition was preserved, there is hope the rest of the matter can now be addressed in full. Had Terri died, the lawyers and guardian would be guilty of negligent homicide, and conspiracy to violate civil rights. They are lucky the Governor intervened, and should be thanking him they aren't held to the same constitutional standards!

See letter below to Houston Chronicle Viewpoints:

RE: “Husband will take fight to court – Will challenge Jeb Bush’s order to reinsert feeding tube” Oct. 24

October 24, 2003

Dear Viewpoints Editor:

Regarding the continuing legal battle in Florida, “Husband will take fight to court / Will challenge Jeb Bush’s order to reinsert feeding tube” Oct. 24, lawyers contesting the governor’s actions should hold themselves, and the courts, to the same constitutional standards. They would find more reasons to be thankful than to complain.

By enforcing the guardian’s beliefs over those of the family, the courts failed to protect the equal religious freedom for all citizens, thus violating the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. When no court would respect the family’s right to petition, had the Governor and legislature not accepted that responsibility, the family’s First Amendment rights would further have been abridged.

Were they held to the same constitutional standards, as officers of the court, the lawyers would be found guilty of conspiring with judicial authority to violate civil rights. Any actions taken by the Governor and legislature to check the judiciary were no more or less “unconstitutional” than the original violations committed by lawyers in the courts.

Emily T. Nghiem
9 posted on 10/24/2003 7:49:52 PM PDT by emilynghiem (uniform application of laws)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Becki
It seems to me that the FL legislature just passed a law. The courts are to uphold it.



Or declare it unconstitutional......
10 posted on 10/24/2003 7:52:21 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
"Just in the last two days, I have received scores of e-mails and calls of outrage over this act. Many people have contacted us offering support, both material and in other ways."

Scores. Compared to the thousands going the other way, doesn't sound like many.

11 posted on 10/24/2003 8:14:54 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport
Or declare it unconstitutional......

But what makes it unconstitutional? The mere fact that it changes the governing law for the future shouldn't. After all, that's what all legislation does.

12 posted on 10/24/2003 8:16:44 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
But what makes it unconstitutional?


I have not idea what they'll find. But if they hear the case and rule then I'm sure they will state their reasoning... till then, who knows
13 posted on 10/24/2003 8:22:30 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: deport
We know from past experience that the SCOFLAWs are perfectly capable of coming up with a flagrantly wrong rationale for a ridiculous conclusion. If they do so again this time and find this law unconstitutional, does that mean that the law is unconstitutional?
14 posted on 10/24/2003 8:24:26 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
If a tree falls in the forest and no one is within hearing distance..... did the falling of the tree make a noise?

15 posted on 10/24/2003 8:30:17 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: deport
If the SCOFLAWs decide incorrectly that this law is unconstitutional, it might mean that there is no way to save Terri Schiavo (there might be ways to get round such a decision by further legislation, I don't know,) but that doesn't mean there couldn't or shouldn't be other effects of such a bad decision. For example, the Florida constitution could be changed to limit the power of the courts for the future.
16 posted on 10/24/2003 8:42:05 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy; LaraCroft; luv2lurkhere; Budge; floriduh voter; summer; Coleus; amom; ruoflaw; ...
In a move that horrified Terri's family last year, Bushnell also filed a petition with probate Judge George Greer seeking authorization of pre-payment for Terri's cremation and burial expenses out of the fund.

Man "finds" Wife unconscious.

Man keeps Wife unconscious.

Man gets malpractice money for Wife.

Man wants Wife's money.

Man wants Wife dead so Man can have money.

Man gets Lawyer.

Lawyer is/was Hospice Board Member.

Lawyer promises Man that Wife will die at the Hospice...

TERRI SCHIAVO PING! – let me know if you want on/off this ping list


17 posted on 10/25/2003 12:25:33 AM PDT by NYer ("Close your ears to the whisperings of hell and bravely oppose its onslaughts." ---St Clare Assisi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
I hope the liberals strike a blow for the "Right to Kill." And with a friendly State Supreme Court in their pocket, I'd put even money on the Terri Shiavo law being ruled unconstitutional.
18 posted on 10/25/2003 12:31:13 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .38sw; 11th Earl of Mar; 2nd amendment mama; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; 4Godsoloved..Hegave; ...
Ping for LIFE and LIBERTY!
19 posted on 10/25/2003 12:36:34 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I hope the liberals strike a blow for the "Right to Kill."

Why... you mean, so their evil will be outed for all to see?

20 posted on 10/25/2003 1:17:07 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson