Gay male life expectancy is still low even when you take out AIDS deaths. I remember seeing an item awhile back that said homosexual men are six times more likely to commit suicide than heterosexuals of the same age group.
To: agenda_express; BA63; banjo joe; Believer 1; billbears; ChewedGum; Cordova Belle; cyphergirl; ...
BreakPoint/Chuck Colson Ping! If anyone wants on or off my BreakPoint Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
2 posted on
10/22/2003 8:16:30 AM PDT by
Mr. Silverback
(Pray for Terry Schiavo, being murdered by a judge in Florida.)
To: Mr. Silverback
According to the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, the life expectancy of a homosexual male is twenty years less than that of a heterosexual male.
I'm gutted. :0)
3 posted on
10/22/2003 8:22:45 AM PDT by
crazycat
To: Mr. Silverback
I had a gay roommate in college one year. One time I looked through a gay newspaper he subscribed to. My impression from looking at the obit pages was (a) that the cause of death, when listed, was either suicide or illness, and (b) they were typically young (<40).
4 posted on
10/22/2003 8:37:04 AM PDT by
Fudd
To: Mr. Silverback
There is an interesting dicotomy here when we speak about healthcare. Many employers (especially goernment) have taken it upon themselves to order their employees to stop smoking. We have no-smoking bans and instances were local governments have even threatened to fire smokers...even when they do it in the privacy of their own home. Their reasoning behind this is healthcare and the rising costs of premiums. In other words, we have people who are discriminated against, under the guise of healthcare, for a lifetyle choice. If we were to take this to the next logical step, wouldn't it be just as valid for employees to discriminate against homosexuals based on this same concern? Doesn't this lifestyle cost healthcare providers and insurers just as much money in premiums and care? How about obesity and overweight employees? Isn't this, many times, a lifstyle choice that costs as much in medical care as smokers? If we can discriminate against smokers based on heathcare, why not other lifestyle choices that cost as much in medical care as they do?
5 posted on
10/22/2003 8:37:10 AM PDT by
cwb
To: Mr. Silverback
We need to realize that there are those who would like to make articles like this a crime (it's already happening in several countries). And when telling the truth is a crime, does the word "totalitarian" come to mind?
To: Mr. Silverback
This just makes too much sense.
Like General Boykin, somebody needs to "investigate" Colson for telling the truth.
14 posted on
10/22/2003 9:01:05 AM PDT by
Gritty
To: Mr. Silverback
I think the article in question is
this one. Rather than buy it, you can see the authors' explanation of the study
here.
19 posted on
10/22/2003 9:17:32 AM PDT by
r9etb
To: scripter; EdReform
ping
22 posted on
10/22/2003 10:19:58 AM PDT by
xzins
(And now I will show you the most excellent way!)
To: Mr. Silverback
While they're not smoking one dangerous thing, they're certainly smokin' another just as dangerous...
To: Mr. Silverback
Gay male life expectancy is still low even when you take out AIDS deaths. I remember seeing an item awhile back that said homosexual men are six times more likely to commit suicide than heterosexuals of the same age group. Blow their brains out?
24 posted on
10/22/2003 12:43:47 PM PDT by
N. Theknow
(Be a glowworm, a glowworm's never glum, cuz how can you be grumpy when the sun shines out your bum.)
To: Mr. Silverback
Thanks for posting this as there are some related, informative and very helpful links at the end of the original article.
26 posted on
10/22/2003 1:41:28 PM PDT by
scripter
(Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson