Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

All US planes being searched
Fox News Cable | Oct 17, 2003

Posted on 10/17/2003 8:58:26 AM PDT by TomGuy

Box cutters, bleach found in 2 packages on Southwest Airlines plane.

All commercial planes in US currently being searched.

developing............


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airlinesecurity; nathanielheatwole
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-252 next last
To: diamondjoe
I think the lure of free guided missiles will prove irresistable to the terrorists-and I am sure they will try gas to circumvent the getting beaten to sh*t by the passengers problem.

This could be very, very bad news.

201 posted on 10/17/2003 11:13:49 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
I shudder to think that there would be an entire airplane full of people who would, knowing what we know, allow the aircraft to be hijacked under any circumstances. It doesn't really matter what weapons the hijackers have, be they knives, handguns, or full-auto assault rifles.

AQ tactics 101 will certainly recognize the need to disable the passengers.

202 posted on 10/17/2003 11:15:11 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: MattAMiller
...What sort of terrorist would leave a note expressing concern for security?

A terrorist looking for a diversion?

203 posted on 10/17/2003 11:15:34 AM PDT by relee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Sounds like a scam. Somebody is making work, or looking to gain or maintain power.
204 posted on 10/17/2003 11:16:09 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
If zero risk was possible, that's what they'd opt for. It would be an easy business decision. The fact is, there is no "zero risk" scenario.

I was using "zero risk" as a simplistic example of a rather complex computation for making business decisions. I thought that was obvious. Obvious it was not.

205 posted on 10/17/2003 11:18:12 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: marktuoni
Nearly knocked myself out once peeing into a toilet my wife had filled with bleach!! Was she cleaning, or was it something else...I wonder!

Sounds like a topic for a Lifetime movie of the week. :^)

206 posted on 10/17/2003 11:24:35 AM PDT by Samwise (There are other forces at work in this world, Frodo, besides the will of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
I figured as much. But I think airlines will strive to minimize risk. No reasonable person wants a plane to go down.
207 posted on 10/17/2003 11:25:10 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz
That's just retarded, which is about what I would expect from them.

They hate the U.S. for supporting the Jews, and then convince themselves that the Jews attacked the U.S. ... and we deserved it.

How do these idiots remember to breathe?
208 posted on 10/17/2003 11:29:33 AM PDT by watchin (Muslim: someone who reserves the right to defend himself against someone who hits back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
A little bleach in one small container--mix with ammonia from a second container--creates a highly toxic gas that is lethal.

This is really freaking me out! I absolutely HATE flying, but I had to a few weeks ago. While I was flying, I kept thinking about ways a terrorist could bring down a plane without a bomb or without their "traditional" way (box cutters and brute force.) And chemicals came to mind. I kept telling myself that surely the authorities know that this is a possibility and they have ways to check for this.

And then I find this report.

209 posted on 10/17/2003 11:30:43 AM PDT by cantfindagoodscreenname (SAVE THE BLACK FLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
I figured as much. But I think airlines will strive to minimize risk. No reasonable person wants a plane to go down.

No reasonable person wants an SUV to roll over or a gas tank to explode either, but auto manufacturers calculate the cost of reducing that risk with the cost of a civil lawsuit all the time. Take the airline industry, again, for example. They could install anti-missle defenses on every commercial jet, which would subtantially reduce the chances of a plane being shot out of the sky. Why then haven't they done it? I suspect the reason is the result of risk analysis: The likelihood of the event vs. the cost of significantly reducing that likelihood vs. the economic impact to the business in the event nothing is done and the event happens.

210 posted on 10/17/2003 11:34:53 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: berkeleybeej
In that scenario it is a partial failure.
211 posted on 10/17/2003 11:37:19 AM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
Don't forget to include the likelihood of preventive measures being effective.

Take off and landing practices need to be adjusted (i.e., steep climb, dive and turning, as a matter of routine), if we are serious about mounting countermeasures to ground-to-air missile threats.

212 posted on 10/17/2003 11:38:23 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
All of this goes into the calculation, which is why I don't believe that the airline industry can be left alone to care for airline/airport security subject only to the free flow of economic forces, any more than the direct marketing industry is capable of regulating junk mail, spam, and telephone solicitations.
213 posted on 10/17/2003 11:44:27 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: appalachian_dweller
Which airport?

All of them.

214 posted on 10/17/2003 11:48:25 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Stop the violins!! Visualize whirled peas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: twigs
I think some American Carriers fly to Scotland..And the UK has very tight security, has for a long time..So let her go :-)
215 posted on 10/17/2003 11:51:39 AM PDT by pesto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
Not sure what your statement is trying to convey...

I don't think this find presents a great enough threat to warrent this sort of nationwide search. It looks like somebody was trying to test security.

216 posted on 10/17/2003 11:52:51 AM PDT by MattAMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
All of this goes into the calculation, which is why I don't believe that the airline industry can be left alone to care for airline/airport security subject only to the free flow of economic forces

The TSA and FAA haven't advocated effective countermeasures against the threat of foreign object in airplanes or the threat of ground to air missle. Anyway, it seems as though you have hat you are advocating, FedGov regulation of flight safety as respecting said threats. Criticism is not necessarily unhealthy.

217 posted on 10/17/2003 11:55:07 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130
Bleach?
Have it in a small bottle and urinate into it.
Instant small area chlorine gas cloud.
Minor irritant, unless it's dense enough to kill people.
Humans make the ammonia naturally.
One would only need to smuggle some bleach onboard.
218 posted on 10/17/2003 12:06:23 PM PDT by Darksheare (Resistance is futile, but we may be placated with chocolates and shiny trinkets to add to our hord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy; All

219 posted on 10/17/2003 12:07:53 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (God Bless and Protect our military and our allies military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LizardQueen
My sarge from when I was in uniform said he used to pinch off chunks of C-4 and use it like sterno in Vietnam.
Supposedly it's stable enough to do that to.
Something about it being a high explosive and needing the blasting cap to start off the internal pressure wave that high explosives use to generate their blast power or some such.
Not that I'd want to try 'C-4 sterno' myself.

Don't quote me on it, I'm not a demolitionist or an explosives expert.
I was merely an artilleryman.
220 posted on 10/17/2003 12:19:02 PM PDT by Darksheare (Resistance is futile, but we may be placated with chocolates and shiny trinkets to add to our hord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-252 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson