Is Newt Gingrich Running For Shadow President?

Is Newt Gingrich distancing himself from Trump or promising to be the responsible party who will really run a Trump administration?

The following things were said about Donald Trump in recent days: “This is one of the worst mistakes Trump has made. I think it’s inexcusable;” “the kinds of mistakes that amateurs make;” and “an absurd amateur mistake.”

It is not at all unusual that someone said those things. They are pretty obvious responses to Trump’s attempt to turn his personal grudge against a judge, tinged with an element of prejudice against people of Mexican descent, into a campaign theme.

What’s unusual is who said them: Newt Gingrich, an early establishment endorser of Trump and potential vice-presidential candidate.

So how should we interpret these criticisms? Is Gingrich laying the groundwork for a de-endorsement and abandonment of Trump? Or more likely, is it a way to support Trump while trying to keep from being tarred by Trump’s behavior? (Good luck with that.)

Or there’s a more intriguing possibility: Gingrich is running for shadow president.

Consider how this sort of thing will be taken if Gingrich actually does get the vice-presidential nod or some other prominent position in the administration. The message is, “Sure, Trump is crazy and shoots off his mouth off and makes these absurdly amateur mistakes. But he’ll be surrounded by responsible adults like me who will walk everything back and tamp it down and keep it from becoming a problem.” From which we could draw the further inference, “So maybe you should just come to me first, bypass the flashy, loudmouthed figurehead, and go straight to the people who actually runs things.”

Gingrich is running to be what Democrats thought Dick Cheney was for George W. Bush. He is positioning himself, or someone like himself, as the power behind the throne.

I say “or someone like himself,” but let’s face it, Gingrich would almost certainly like it to be himself. Back in the 1990s, I read what was basically Gingrich’s campaign book — the kind of book you write when you’re running for president, except that Gingrich wrote it when he was about to become speaker of the House, and that tells you something. A recurring theme was that Gingrich is a big fan of historian Arnold Toynbee’s “challenge and response” theory. The idea is that in every era, some big central crisis to our civilization presents itself, requiring a great man and visionary leader to rise to the occasion and champion a creative response to that challenge. It was pretty clear that Gingrich saw himself as this visionary leader.

His vision has frequently changed whether it was futurism and free laptops, Contract with America, or a 51st state on the moon. The specific vision changes, but the thing that remains the same is his belief that eventually America will realize the man it needs to lead it out of an era of crisis is none other than Newt Gingrich.

He’s been hanging around, waiting for that moment for a long time. And now, just when it seems that it passed him by, he has his second chance — this time with Trump as the powerful personality who captures the public’s imagination, but with Gingrich as the real visionary behind the scenes.

Maybe this sounds too much like a conspiracy theory or something even more ridiculously implausible, like the plot line of a Shonda Rhimes television show.

Then again, isn’t this the central case offered to us for Trump by the establishment GOP types who have come over to his side? Trump’s original sales pitch was that he would be the loose cannon who would break things and disrupt the establishment and overturn the status quo. Now we’re being told: don’t worry, Trump will moderate. As Gingrich puts it, Trump has learned “in the last two days and has taken very significant steps away from that and moved toward a more controlled, more civil approach.” So the new sales pitch is that Trump will have sensible people around him, people like us, who will take all of this populist rhetoric and divert it into responsible channels.

In other words, the concept of an establishment shadow presidency with Trump as its figurehead is already central to the Republican Party leadership’s acceptance of him as their candidate. It’s certainly central to the personal ambitions of many of the people now attaching themselves to his campaign.

Maybe that’s how it will play out, or maybe it’s the establishment types who are fooling themselves and will find themselves double-crossed by Trump. If this really is a live-action Shonda Rhimes show, then we know things aren’t necessarily what they seem, and there’s going to be some kind of crazy twist, even if it doesn’t make very much sense.

And Gingrich running for shadow president makes about as much sense as anything else this election year.

OK. Good choice (albeit the downside is that he’ll be too old to succeed Trump, one reason I support Cruz).

Thanks. I’m hoping that Trump’s success will inspire more conservative people to enter politics, but not as a career. I’ve had it with career politicians.

It’s not that there haven’t been good people, but too many get “assimilated” in under 6 years (6 being the demonstrable period with which good people get spoiled).

With respect to Jeff Sessions, we have the late liberal Dem Sen. Howell Heflin to thank for him. Heflin HATED Sessions and actively and successfully worked to keep him from getting a federal judiciary office. Sessions got even by running for Howell’s Senate seat and winning, and as we know now, is in the running for VP. Had Howell not been so bent on early revenge, Sessions would merely be just another (albeit excellent) federal judge today instead of becoming a powerful and influential Senator far and beyond Heflin.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.