Posted on 06/04/2016 6:39:07 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Bernie Sanders is playing a selfish, dangerous game.
He has no chance of winning the Democratic nomination — none, zero, zilch. Yet he persists in attacking Hillary Clinton, and his supporters threaten to disrupt the Democratic convention in a way that can have only one effect: helping elect Donald Trump president.
Does he want that to be his legacy? Apparently he doesn’t care. Sanders’ ego has swelled to Trumpian proportions, and he has rejected numerous and increasingly desperate appeals from senior Democrats to recognize reality and back off.
Sanders and his wife, Jane, we are told, feel “disrespected” by party leaders and have somehow decided that Clinton and the Democrats are his real enemy, not Trump and the Republicans.
The New York Times reported recently that his strategy was “aimed at inflicting a heavy blow on Hillary Clinton” before the end of the primaries. Even if Sanders doesn’t win the nomination, he would “arrive at the Philadelphia convention with maximum political power.”
Tad Devine, a senior Sanders strategist, told the Times that the candidate was “not thinking about” the damage he was inflicting on Clinton. “The only thing that matters is what happens between now and June 14,” he said. “We have to put the blinders on.”
Exactly. “Blinders” is the right word. Team Sanders is so consumed by its own self-righteousness that it has become one of Trump’s top assets. And Republicans are ecstatic.
“Just to acknowledge the obvious,” veteran GOP strategist Ed Rogers wrote in The Washington Post, “Clinton and the Democratic ticket become weaker the longer Sanders stays in the race.”
Trump himself understands how useful Sanders has become, taunting in a tweet that “Bernie Sanders is being treated very badly by the Democrats — the system is rigged against him. Many of his disenfranchised fans are for me!”
In the latest NBC/Wall Street Journal survey, Clinton’s favorable rating among Democrats has dropped from 84 percent last June to 65 percent; her negatives have jumped from 7 percent to 21 percent. Just 66 percent of Sanders supporters say they will back Clinton against Trump.
Sure, Clinton’s missteps have aggravated her problems; and sure, those numbers will change once she’s nominated. But Sanders is not losing gracefully. He is planting seeds of long-term grievance, particularly among younger voters, calling Clinton the “lesser of two evils” and arguing that somehow “the system is rigged” and she is stealing the nomination unfairly.
That is false. Sanders claims to be a pillar of integrity, but he’s deceiving his supporters. Clinton has won fair and square. She has 3 million more votes and 271 more elected delegates — 766 more, when super delegates are included.
Sanders has been deeply deceitful in another way as well. He has promised his followers a leftist “revolution” that was never, ever going to happen. He set them up for the bitterness and disappointment that is now infecting their ranks.
He is the liberal version of the Tea Party, which told conservatives that if they were sent to Washington, they would change the basic nature of the capital, repealing Obamacare, curtailing abortion and heralding a new conservative era.
That was a lie from the beginning. With a Democrat in the White House, the tea party agenda stood no chance of ever being achieved. But the resulting frustration in Republican circles helped drive Speaker John Boehner and his chief deputy Eric Cantor into premature retirement.
Sanders is fomenting the same kind of frustration among his supporters. They have been promised a Fantasy Land of liberal proposals that stand no chance of passage — none — in modern America.
This is a center-right country. In 2012 exit polls, only 25 percent of voters identified as liberals (35 percent identified as conservatives, and 41 percent as moderates). Ted Cruz was flat-out wrong to say that Republicans have failed to win the White House because their candidates were not conservative enough. And Sanders is just as misguided to say that what the Democrats need is a more purist liberal as their standard bearer.
Sanders’ animosity toward Clinton would not matter so much if she were running against an extreme conservative like Cruz, or even a conventional Republican like Mitt Romney. Geography and demography heavily favor the Democrats, who have won the popular vote in five of the last six presidential elections.
But Clinton is running against Trump. Trump is different. Trump is unpredictable. Trump can shuffle the deck and scramble expectations.
And Sanders is helping him.
Take out the unelected superdelegates and it is nearly an even race between hillary and bernie
But Sanders is not losing gracefully.
*********************************
That’s what is really irritating them.
They expected gracious losers both in the primaries and against ¡Yeb! in the general.
Trump has no intention of losing gracefully, either.
Has any other presumptive nominee "backed" into the nomination like this? Has any other nominee lost the majority of the final primary contests?
She may have the necessary numbers in the end but it's hardly inspiring and right or wrong, a lot of Bernie supporters are going to feel cheated.
At the very least, Crooked Hillary is going to have to share the convention stage with Bernie and this is going to just ruin her whole week - this was supposed to be her "coronation" after all.
This was posted in my local newspaper last week. The one by the Roberts’ prior to this one was Trump is dangerous. Only Hillary can save us.
I am surprised they haven’t suffocated yet from having their heads so far up hiLIARy’s anal orifice. Their columns always elicit nausea.
“Bernie Sanders is playing a selfish, dangerous game.”
Notice how the enemedia considers everyone dangerous except Crooked Hillary?
Oh, no, Cokie. His ego has swelled to Cokian proportions!
The truth is that Clinton is barely winning if one takes out the super delegates.
A victory for Sanders in California will make it even closer. They’re only 268 real delegates apart. Sanders has won about 46% of the real delegates, so there is no Clinton mandate by any means.
1769 Hillary Clinton: 2,316 (includes 547 superdelegates)
1501 Bernie Sanders: 1,547 (includes 46 superdelegates)
Not yet allocated: 902
We’re “Feelin’ the Bern” in California. Bernie will take the California Democrat Primary on Tuesday. A win by the 74-year old from Ben & Jerry country in sunny California will be hard for Crooked Hillary to explain away.
HIllary will drag down the entire D party ticket from the presidency to your local dog catcher
this is why I think her “super-delegates” won’t stay bought
and that they will switch the nomination over to somebody, almost anybody else....Bernie or ?
This could have been written about Cruz.
Bernie and his brownshirts may have no chance (due entirely to the super delegates) to win the Democrat nomination, but he has every likelihood of splitting the Democrat party permanently. .. and walking away with by far the biggest piece of the wishbone.
Obama and the Clinton never saw this coming.
Soros back stabbed them.
Trump would do the same thing though, and we would welcome it as the best chance to beat Hillary or Bernie unless he stumbles.
I agree the Dem system is rigged worse than the Republican. But it's all been done in plain sight usually. People are supposed to know going in what the rules are. But it's complicated and confusing. And I'm still not sure Hillary really won Iowa or the coin tosses or maybe other states. She has too many on her side who will do almost whatever it takes to win for her.
If Bernie succeeds in getting rid of DWS, he will have done everyone a favor though.
But all bets are off this time around.
Steve and Cokie Roberts should be ashamed to call themselves “Journalists”. They are obviously Democrat party hacks.
Paraphrase: “Sanders and his wife consider Shrillery and the ‘Rats bigger enemies than the Republicans.”
Well whattayaknow?! Boiney finally got something right. In terms of danger to our Nation, the Clintons and the ‘Rats are much bigger enemies.
I think Sanders is doing for the democrats what Trump is doing for the Republicans. He is turning over rocks and exposing the vileness underneath. Personally, I detest a lot of Sander’s views, but I can’t help but admire him for seeing this through.
The MSM will make the most of the rancor that came out of the contest for the Republican presidential nomination ... but they are trying to cover up the fact that it is actually the Democrat Party who are facing melt-down.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.