Posted on 04/11/2016 3:18:22 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Two things are worth noting about Donald Trumps whining over what he suddenly perceives as the rigged GOP nomination contest.
1. Trump is powerfully illustrating the fraud at the core of his case for the nomination. He claims that because he is a successful businessman he would be much more adept than conventional politicians at mastering the intricacies of problems and processes. He will, he brags, figure out how to deal with challenges in a way that maximizes American interests, assembling the best, most competent people to execute his plans of action. As a result, we are told, American will win, win, win with such numbing regularity that we will be bored to tears by all the success.
But look what is happening. The process of choosing a Republican nominee for president, while far from simple, is not as complicated as many of the challenges that cross an American presidents desk. There are, moreover, countless experienced hands who know how the process works and how to build an organization nimble enough to navigate the array of primaries (open and closed), caucuses, party meetings, varying delegate-allocation formulas, etc., exploiting or mitigating the advantages and disadvantages these present for different kinds of candidates. Yet, Trump has been out-organized, out-smarted, and out-worked by the competition in particular, Ted Cruz, whom I support.
Trump is not being cheated. Everyone is playing by the same rules, which were available to every campaign well in advance. Trump simply is not as good at converting knowledge into success notwithstanding the centrality of this talent to his candidacy. Perhaps this is because he is singularly good at generating free publicity (and consequently minimizing the publicity available to his rivals). Maybe he underestimated the importance of building a competent, experienced campaign organization. But he can hardly acknowledge this because it is a colossal error of judgment and his purportedly peerless judgment is the selling point of his campaign.
At The Transom, Ben Domench succinctly describes the Trump campaigns recent performance:
How terribly did the Trump team mismanage their delegate slate? Last week they fired their organizer and hired a new one, who promptly made an official flier which sent votes to the wrong delegates. http://vlt.tc/2cp9 After firing the organizer initially put in charge of Colorado last week, Trumps team hired Patrick Davis, a GOP operative from Colorado Springs, to put together a slate in an effort to win some of the delegate slots to be elected by just fewer than 4,000 party activists at Saturdays assembly Trumps last-minute organizing effort did not go well. The leaflet his campaign handed out listed a slate of 26 delegates. But in many cases the numbers indicating their ballot position more than 600 delegates are running for 13 slots were off, meaning that Trumps team was mistakenly directing votes toward other candidates delegates. And even when they tried to fix the screw-up, they still failed to get it right. The mistakes were exposed at the worst possible moment Trump volunteers frantically printed new lists with new names and ballot numbers but those lists also had mistakes.
Trump is constitutionally incapable of admitting errors a flaw exacerbated by a campaign premised on a personality rather than a program. So his now familiar, repulsive reaction is to smear his opposition as cheaters, liars and even law-breakers while Roger Stone, one of Trumps brass-knuckles specialists, threatens to extort delegates. The stubborn fact, however, is that Trump has a management problem namely Trump. He grossly miscalculated the task at hand, he is scrambling to find suitable staff way too late in the game, and in a vain effort to divert attention from his own failings he is slandering others. This is the kind of candidate he has been, and the damage someone of his judgment and temperament could do if he were president is blatant.
2. Trump is so out of his depth he fails to see that the chief beneficiary of the process he now indicts as a rigged and corrupt insiders game is Trump himself.
NBC News points out that, despite having won only a little over a third of all votes cast in primaries to date (37 percent), Trump has been awarded nearly half of the delegates (45 percent, for a current total of 756 delegates). That is, the undemocratic features of the process Trump has suddenly decided to malign have actually boosted his campaign with 22 percent more delegates than his mere vote total would justify. That easily surpasses the 14-percent premium earned by Senator Cruz, who has been awarded 32 percent of delegates upon winning 28 percent of the popular vote.
There is no doubt that the bias in favor of the frontrunner is a feature Republican party leaders (aka, the GOP establishment) built into the process. They clearly hoped to help whatever candidate they preferred (neither Trump nor Cruz) wrap up the nomination early, unite the party, and turn the focus to beating the Democrats in November.
The fact that this process is undemocratic, as Trump now complains, was immaterial to Trump as long as he appeared to be the beneficiary i.e., as long as it might get him the 1,237 delegates needed to win the nomination before he had enough raw votes to justify that total. But the democracy claim is specious in any event.
Our constitutional system has never been, nor aspired to be, a pure democracy; the Framers designed a republic. Similarly, the process of choosing party nominees for president has never been a pure democracy; it is and has always been a mixed bag of popular vote and various arrangements that give elected delegates and party leaders considerable influence.
The rules for 2016 state contests have not been changed in midstream; they have been known from the start. How each campaign applies them tells us a great deal that we need to know about the candidates. That is why it is a fantasy to believe the GOP establishment can get away with rigging the convention process to insert a white knight candidate who has not been campaigning. The only way to run for president is to run for president.
The ultimate check on the process is political, not legal. If the partys grass-roots supporters are inflamed into a mob mentality and generate enough votes to nominate an unfit candidate, the general electorate will punish the party at the ballot box in November. On the other hand, if the party bosses use their influence over the process to override the will of the grass-roots and anoint their own factotum, their grass-roots supporters will punish the party by not showing up to vote in November, assuring victory for the opposition. This means party officials must both heed and lead the public. That is how a republic is supposed to work but no one ever said it was supposed to be pretty.
Trump spent years trying to buy the establishment insiders he now purports to run against, contributing mightily to the progressive system he now purports to oppose as a tribune of the people. He delighted in the frontrunner advantages of the nomination system as long as he was benefitting effortlessly. But now that we have reached the inevitable stage of the long campaign in which effort and judgment are shown to be crucial, Trumps lack of fitness becomes increasingly obvious.
The moguls business career is a stream of win, win, win braggadocio interrupted by lots of huge losses resulting from huge miscalculations. Dont expect his political career to turn out differently.
I tried to add you to the post begging you to stop with the stupid pictures. Sorry, I couldn’t spell your name.
Sealed his own records.
Trump is running his campaign like he is a ringmaster at a WWE event.
I don’t see the issue as being the GOPe is not playing by the rules. I see the issue as the GOPe has stacked the rules heavily in their own favor. Let us concede that the GOP is a private entity and that its “owners” are the GOPe. I’m not sure most GOP voters see it that way (many I’m sure see us as stockholders, rather than mere purchasers of the GOP brand), and may be a little shocked to realize it is actually no as they thought.
Furthermore, if we concede the GOP is a private entity not owned by the voters, then the goal of the GOPe (the owners) is to convince we the voters that they have our interests at heart. They fail miserably at this. And using well established rules to nullify the popular vote isn’t necessarily wrong in a legal sense, but it sure does not engender voter allegiance. They are like used-car salesmen intent on getting your money and giving you a lemon.
I for one will walk off the car lot, if the GOPe hucksters do a bait and switch on the 2016 model.
“Now, read the rules..”
Ouch!
It’s funny, I saw the title of this article and my first thought was, I bet 2ndDivisionVet posted this...and I was right.
:-) Yeah, I guess I shouldn’t have used the “nearly” qualifier. Especially since so far, not a single Trumpster has even come up with a feeble attempt at refuting the argument.
Oh, sure. Ted's on our side!
Now refute the author’s points.
I am a Trump supporter, as you can see from my post history, but I will agree that Trumps team had not served him well in groundwork. Where is the advanced team in each state, prepping for primaries, working the officials and state rules and building relationships with delegates?
I just scroll right past them to keep my IQ at the proper level.
Don't you mean, the 'nearly unassailable argument'? You cucks are becoming parodies of yourselves:
Another thing was just posted on Facebook.
The Donald J. Trump Foundation was the recipient of the funds raised for veterans (because Donald is afraid of Megyn) and the majority of those funds have yet to go to the vets.
The Foundation is making excuses.
Typical Donald. He loves to lend his name to various deals and businesses and then he takes no further interest.
This is why he got in trouble over his products made overseas and his fake University.
It would be the same thing with a presidency. He would name the White House for himself and then lose interest.
Over 1,300,000 voters in Florida voted against Trump. But “Those voters were DISENFRANCHISED!!!!! Trump STOLE all 99 delegates!!!!!” Said no Trump supporter ever.
Cruz should just offer that they split up all of the votes proportionately based on vote counts in each state as Trump says he wants. That would take 150 delegates away from Trump.
I started in one place and ended in another on the subject of natural born citizen also. That took about a year and a lot of reading. The trouble with Obama is not do much where he was born, but that his soul has never been American.
“A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines.” Ralph Waldo Emerson Self Reliance
Sorry, meant that for Diogenesis
Never get down in the trough with Birthers like Vetsy, Rufus. You'll only get muddy:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2511742/posts?page=20#20
20 posted on 5/12/2010, 3:03:41 PM by 2ndDivisionVet (Dont care if he was born in a manger on July 4th! A Natural Born citizen requires two US parents!)
Talk about the Dem Super-delegates and the GOP and their sycophants are pointing fingers at how The Screech gets more delegates by losing than Freebie gets by winning.
Talk about the GOP Super-delegates and the GOP goes into a rage that there is no such thing as GOP super-delegates, yada yada yada.
So, then, why is the GOP delegate system so complicated in so many states and why are the delegates just not all determined by the primary votes?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.