Posted on 03/05/2015 9:46:51 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Scott Walker in 2015 is a lot like Barack Obama circa 2007; hes relatively unknown and yet well-known at the same time. Obamas speech at the DNC in 2004 propelled him to rock-star status among the Democratic faithful, while Walkers victory over the public sector labor unions in 2011 made him a legend among conservatives. The Wisconsin Governor begins this campaign as a vessel into which voters can pour their hopes and aspirations. The question now is whether the idea of Walker can match up with the reality of Walker.
At the annual Club for Growth conference in Florida this weekend, Walker was met by a group of conservative Republicans eager for a candidate who would throw some punches. After two consecutive White House losses, this crowd wanted to see a fighter. Instead, of Warrior Walker, however, they were met by Wonky Walker. At an 8:00 a.m. breakfast speech, the Wisconsin Governor ticked through his talking points about Wisconsins growing economy with accountant-like delivery. He left the room to polite applause. Meanwhile, Sens. Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, who have been long-time Club allies and endorsees, ended their speeches to standing ovations.
The flat speech marked a less than illustrious couple of weeks for the Wisconsin Governor. Criticism over his non-answer on Rudy Giulianis anti-Obama comments were quickly followed by criticism for his non-answer to the Is Obama a Christian? question. His remarks to CPAC on Friday, in which he intimated that his success in dealing with 100,000 protestors in Madison prepared him to deal with ISIS, earned him blowback in the conservative media. Trying to get ahead of criticism that he once supported legal status for illegal immigrants, Walker went full pander on Sunday, telling Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace that my view has changed on the issue.
Walkers quick rise in the polls is a double-edged sword. While it gets him in front of GOP donors and voters who wouldnt have given him much thought, it also puts a big target on his back. And, its clear that hes not yet prepared for the scrutiny. One top level Republican campaign operative not affiliated with any candidate in 2016 described Walker as a candidate who has gotten out in front of his supply lines.
However, theres no evidence that these early stumbles are impacting Walkers appeal. While he didnt get people to their feet in Florida, he didnt turn them off either. Moreover, it was clear from my observations at the Club confab that no candidate won the weekend. A hearty applause didnt necessarily equal support for his presidential campaign. The Club donors, like so many GOPers, seemed eager to find a candidate who was without obvious baggage or disqualifying positions on key issues.
Interestingly enough, Walker gets a benefit of the doubt that Bush doesnt get. In fact, while Walker is an empty vessel, Bush comes in as a half-full (or half-empty, depending on your perspective) vessel. Most Republicans have an opinion about the former Florida Governor (his last name is a problem; hes got a Common Core problem; hes too moderate), even though they know about as much about him and his overall record as they do Walkers. Meanwhile, Bush has done a masterful job of looking like hes campaigning while really not getting out and facing major league pitching. Bush isnt hiding. Hes giving plenty of public speeches, even showing up at the less-than-friendly CPAC venue. Yet, unlike Walker, hes deftly avoided the media scrum.
The other big question for Walker is if hes effectively using his newfound frontrunner status for some serious fundraising. Hes got access to and interest from more donors than ever. Can his team capitalize on this? And/or are donors sold on him?
At the end of the day, Walkers biggest asset is that hes not offensive to any of the GOP factions. His appeal is superficial but significant. At some point, however, Walker will have to go deeper. It is then where well see if his frontrunner status is for real or just a flash in the pan.
“Only, I wonder how we ended up in 2008 with the likes of John McCain.”
I don’t. McCain’s candidacy was nothing more than a gesture of “giving the old man some time in the sun.” Aside from a few hopeful days after bringing Palin aboard, most didn’t expect McCain win. It was a democrat wave year, and Americans got a collective thrill up their leg about the magic negro. McCain had essentially surrendered to that fact when he stated during a debate of all places, “America has nothing to fear from a Barack Obama presidency.” He wasn’t going to win and he knew it.
Walker is paying his cars shrewdly. He has enormous fire power and is sly enough to know when and how to use it. I love that he has everyone tied in knots trying to figure him out. I see some RR in him.
McCain/Palin were ahead until the Wall Street fiasco. Remember? SOMEONE (Soros?) pulled a billion dollars out of the stock market and McCain flew to DC to be involved in the save. Obama just said ‘they can call me if they need me’. Which leads me to believe he KNEW what was going on. From then on, Obama never looked back. His whole political life has been one MASSIVE MANIPULATION of the citizenry. And yes, McCain was ‘next in line’. I was sorely disappointed that he was the nominee, but Palin helped me vote for the ticket.
Tell yourself whatever you need to hear to explain why you might be willing to put another Dim in the WH even after the 8 years of Obama.
Except for the part about success with important executive responsibility, being a Christian and loving America, they really are very similar.
He will need 65 million votes, give or take, to be elected.
Where are they coming from?
From people fleeing Scott Walker’s PRO-AMNESTY Position !
I wish the electorate was what you think it is.
Same old bs
I would personally prefer Cruz, but I will gladly support Walker if it helps stop Bush!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.