Posted on 08/08/2014 5:21:18 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
New York Times best-selling author and long-time journalist Ed Klein said that Valerie Jarrett has been engaging in secret meetings with Sen. Elizabeth Warren in recent months, giving rise to speculations that the Massachusetts political newcomer is actually the administration’s choice to head the White House in 2016.
“President Obama has authorized Valerie Jarrett, his most important political adviser, to hold secret meetings with Elizabeth Warren to encourage her to challenge Hillary Clinton because the Obamas do not want to see the Clintons succeed them in the White House,” Mr. Klein said during a broadcast interview on “America’s Forum” on Newsmax TV.
Mr. Klein said he believes the stories he’s heard from sources about the meetings are “absolutely true,” Newsmax reported. “The mainstream media is concentrated almost entirely on the feud between the tea party and establishment wing of the Republican Party.”
But Mr. Klein said the feud between the Obamas and Clintons — which he details in depth in his recently released “Blood Feud: The Clintons vs. the Obamas” — has been largely ignored, despite its “deep and gut-wrenching” aspects....
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
What if it is a Warren-JARETT ticket??
Two communistas on the same ticket? Not going to happen...
People thought Obama wouldn’t happen. And what do we have to run against them? Retread Romney? Jeb Bush?
I love the Eastside Kids.
I would encourage just that. Let Hillary go 3rd party (Operation Chaos II) and that opens the door for our TP Conservative go enter as a 3rd to go up against the GOPe and its a fatal 4 way death match and in that scenario, the Conservative wins.
Somehow, I just don’t see Hillary’s fat ass heading off to the White Hut.
She cant generate crowds or even real enthusiasm for her after a lifetime of indignation, and failure.
It will be a governor from the mid-west that will win the GOP nomination...
My moderate Dem friends have already crowned Hillary thinking it will bring party back to ‘90s prosperity.
Warren would NOT be well received by them.
A perfect storm if GOP-e wasn’t clueless.
Not Warren, Jarret.
Now that is interesting. Would Hillery knife the dims? Would she be that spiteful if they dump her.
Thanks 2ndDivisionVet.
Valerie Jarrett is a Red Diaper Baby and a Muslim Brotherhood operative. She comes from two or three generations of Communists on both sides. She was born in Iran, though, AFAIK, is an American citizen.
It took only 13 years to get rid of one of the Great Progressive Amendments. When is someone going to have the courage to come out for the repeal of the 16th, 17th, AND 19th amendments?
Never.
They have already run two test for Hillary’s 3rd party run.
The one test was would a 3rd party pull votes from repubs and the second was could they get blacks to vote for someone other than a dem.
It’s was yes for both.
The dem party has become the party of fruits and nuts. They simply can’t win in a 2 way race trying to run on Obamas legacy. Their only hope is to get Hillary in as third party and then dems move over to Hillary. I wouldn’t be surprised if a number of people run on Hillary’s 3rd party ticket against both the dem and republican.
You get someone like the phony Indian Warren promising to continue the Obama legacy and she might get 10% in a 3 way race. She would be the sacrificial kook, no intention of winning, just get Hillary elected so the left can hang onto power.
Black vote will go to Hillary running on the B Clinton legacy.
Youth vote, they vote according to what the latest fad is and 3rd party would be the latest fad.
Hillary also draws women from the republicans.
4 way race, repubs and conservatives split the vote and Hillary is a shoo in.
She’s threatened to wipe the dem party off the face of the earth during B Clintons impeachment, which is why all the dems voted in lockstep not to impeach or remove Clinton.
Clintons are about the Clintons not the dem party. We saw that during the 8 years of B Clinton. Clinton knew in 1993 he couldn’t win reelection with a dem house and senate. He helped get repubs in so he could take credit for what they did and blame his failures on them, not to mention blaming the OKC bombing on them.
The 1960’s radicals always dreamed of a “new” political party to create the new Utopian society.
There is no way a dem can win promising to continue the Obama legacy.
The dems will get a candidate like phony Indian Warren or Moonbeam Brown with not intention of winning just a show.
Get Hillary elected and the left still has the power of the Presidency.
“Someone powerful seems to be against Hillary.”
Billy Jeff.
“Someone powerful seems to be against Hillary.”
Billy Jeff.
>>The civil war in the Dem party if Warren a Clinton are both running would distract them from the GOP nominee. However the GOP would probably screw it up and help them in the process.
The sad thing is, until someone that can vocalize the positives of conservatism is the head of the GOP, you’re right.
RE: Jarrett. Now I know the source of all the liberal expertise in social psychology seen in the administration’s policy and verbage.
“Mock all you want but the cat fight between Hillary and Jarrett? I see Jarrett winning.”
Perhaps, but my sentimental bet would be on Hillary, given the choice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.