First Ad Attacking Paul Ryan: He Wants To “Cut Aid To The Disabled, Children And The Elderly”…

Weasel Zippers ^ | 08/11/2012

[rustyweiss74]

Let the fear mongering begin!

http://youtu.be/oWyk-Mr6cfc

[AmericanInTokyo]

IGNORE.

ENTIRELY EXPECTED.

They had these ads read for five or six possible selectees.

DO NOT let Demos \DNC either put conservatives on a ) defensive, or be) subservient the narrative they control. Reboot and return it completely to Obama's big promises of Hope and Change on the one hand four years ago, and what hell of a mess 75% of the American People know that it is in today.

[tsowellfan]

The Path to Prosperity (Episode 2): Saving Medicare, Visualized

http://youtu.be/DJIC7kEq6kw

[Mortrey]

Paul Ryan wants to cut “aid” (tax money) to the children in the administration:

Isaiah 3:4-
“And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them,
5-And the people will be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbor; the child shall behave himself proudly against the ancient, and the base against the honourable.”

Perfect description of the inexperienced “child” in the People’s House that stupid Americans voted into office to rule over them.(think of Bath-House Barry’s favorite Mussolini pose for the cameras-the honorable founding fathers would cringe at what Americans have done.)

[Shimmer1]

i unfriended my cousin off of Facebook today, when he posted a pro-Obama, and anti Ryan screed. A lying one, i might add.

[publius911]

“Cut Aid To The Disabled, Children And The Elderly”…

Who knew?
50% of the nation's children's parents are disabled, unemployed and/or unemployable.
Or is that climbing past 60%?

I can't help thinking that the tipping point must be somewhere short of 100%.

I wish these insane clowns would address this question.

Confounding Social Security and Medicare with the 180 some purely welfare programs was a deliberate attempt to confuse contributory programs with the welfare explosion. It worked perfectly.

It will be educational to see how many adults will buy into the political sophistry.

[Ann Archy]

I HATE when OUR side PLAYS these soundbites and Ads over and over so that even people on OUR SIDE think they are true!

[Vaduz]

Fodder for the stupid ones it’s the only tool they have,can’t run on a record like theirs.

[nuconvert]

Republicans hate women, children, minorities & the elderly...everyone knows that

[jazzlite]

These should be ignored as LIES, LIES AND INCREDBLE LIES TO COME.

[albie]

This crap again. My Mother lives in an elderly home and when the dems pull this she always calls me and says, “everybody’s saying we could lose our benefits”. At the same time, I can’t picture most of the people in her building even voting.

[jazzlite]

...”i unfriended my cousin off of Facebook today, when he posted a pro-Obama, and anti Ryan screed. A lying one, i might add”...

Good for you. The time to stand is now. Their lies are destructive to all of us and should be stopped in their tracks. We should be talking about the Obama’s ideology vs Paul Ryan’s conservative ideology because that is the central issue in this election.

[driftless2]

"ready"

Exactly. Any person Romney picked not named Karl Marx or Noam Chomsky was going to get blasted by the Dem leftists i.e strategists.

[kanawa]

My comment left on the YouTube video...

“My understanding is there is no cuts, just a slower rate of growth. On the face of it, it looks to not go far enough because it still relies on deficit spending. You guys better get your financial house in order. You’re fast approaching a cliff and all the demagoguery about tax cuts for the rich isn’t going to stop the inevitable. Get your spending under control or the US is headed for catastrophe.”

Comment is currently ‘pending approval’.
I won’t hold my breath...

[tanknetter]

These should be ignored as LIES, LIES AND INCREDBLE LIES TO COME.

They can't be ignored, because they're an attempt to define Ryan before he and the Romney Campaign have a chance to define him themselves.

The ads and attacks need to be responded to, but in a way that turns what starts out as a defensive response into an offense. The 1992 Clinton/Gore Campaign, regrettably, did a very good job of this. They were running 30-second spots that would use the first 10 secs to counter the Bush/Quayle charges, call them a "pathetic" (a favorite term of theirs) attempt to change the focus away from the economy and then use the remaining 20 secs to portray their guys in a positive, contrasting, light.

[tanknetter]

Exactly. Any person Romney picked not named Karl Marx or Noam Chomsky was going to get blasted by the Dem leftists i.e strategists.

And had he actually selected those (or any other Liberal/Progressive) it would have been attacked as a cynical and racist ploy to "get" the first (or is it second?) Black President.

[KC_Lion]

Of Course!

Who else would us Evil Republicans take the Money from!?

[Shimmer1]

The only reason I didn’t answer his post with truth is because it was one of those mass ones, with thousands of responses, he would not have seen mine.