To: presently no screen name
Why vet her, according to your PDS’ers Anybody who uses the term "PDS" (especially against other republicans) only confirms the statement that Sarah Palin is too "divisive" to win a general election.
PDS = sign of controversy
You may want to rethink your usage of this term.
To: tsowellfan
Your remarks give the PDS'ers credit that they are acting in good faith.
But it is clear that the overwhelming majority of them are not.
Cheers!
76 posted on
09/16/2011 11:21:47 PM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: tsowellfan
So it seems you hate a spade being called a spade.
78 posted on
09/16/2011 11:37:30 PM PDT by
antceecee
(Bless us Father.. have mercy on us and protect us from evil.)
To: tsowellfan
Why vet her, according to your PDS’ers - she’s not running. Why not a book on Mitt or Cain or MB?
Why didn't you answer the question. Is it above your pay grade?
(especially against other republicans) only confirms the statement that Sarah Palin is too "divisive" to win a general election.
Who are these other republicans? And what it confirms is you are a parrot for the media.
PDS = sign of controversy....You may want to rethink your usage of this term.
No I will NOT rethink my usage. You libs got a new talking point - a new definition? What's your definition for your leader, Barry? All American?
Conservatism isn't for everyone - and certainly not one like you who sees it as too divisive - I see your contempt for it - a known trait of PDS. Now back in your cage, parrot.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson