Why vet her, according to your PDS’ers - she’s not running. Why not a book on Mitt or Cain or MB?
Why didn't you answer the question. Is it above your pay grade?
(especially against other republicans) only confirms the statement that Sarah Palin is too "divisive" to win a general election.
Who are these other republicans? And what it confirms is you are a parrot for the media.
PDS = sign of controversy....You may want to rethink your usage of this term.
No I will NOT rethink my usage. You libs got a new talking point - a new definition? What's your definition for your leader, Barry? All American?
Conservatism isn't for everyone - and certainly not one like you who sees it as too divisive - I see your contempt for it - a known trait of PDS. Now back in your cage, parrot.
Conservatism isn't for everyone - and certainly not one like you who sees it as too divisive - I see your contempt for it - a known trait of PDS. Now back in your cage, parrot. Hey, Einstein! My statement had nothing to do with political affiliation, liberal, conservative, right of left. It's political strategy I'm talking about. I think you had that reply pre-written before you even read my comment. In fact, it just happened to be my comment you used it on. Didn't matter if the response was relevant to the comment.
The only person I came close to parroting in the statement Anybody who uses the term "PDS" (especially against other republicans) only confirms the statement that Sarah Palin is too "divisive" to win a general election. was Michael Reagan.
Again I say "You may want to rethink your usage of this term PDS" unless you know for sure Sarah Palin is not running in 2012. Unless you're on Mitt's side.