Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New poll shows Trump could be a strong challenger for Romney in NH (Statistical tie)
The Manchester Union Leader ^ | April 5, 2011 | John DiStaso, Senior Political Reporter

Posted on 04/05/2011 11:51:01 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

TUESDAY UPDATE: TRUMP TROUBLE FOR MITT? Donald Trump cuts into Mitt Romney's otherwise strong lead in New Hampshire among Republican potential presidential primary contenders, according to a new poll released on Tuesday.

North Carolina-based and Democratic-leaning Public Policy Polling says it surveyed 384 "usual New Hampshire Republican primary voters" from March 31 through April 3. It says it found that without Trump included in the list of potential contenders, Romney is supported by 32 percent of those polled, more than double the support for Mike Huckabee, at 15 percent, with Newt Gingrich at 13 percent, Sarah Palin and Ron Paul at 10 percent each, Tim Pawlenty and Michele Bachmann at 4 percent each and Haley Barbour at 2 percent with 12 percent undecided.

But when businessman Trump is added to the list, Romney's lead diminishes, according to PPP.

It says it found that Romney leads Trump 27 to 21 percent, with Gingrich and Huckabee at 12 percent each and the others remaining in single digits.

The margin of error for the poll is 5 percent, according to PPP, meaning the Romney-Trump numbers are close to a virtual tie.

"Trump's flogging of the birther conspiracy theory of late has gotten him a lot of traction," PPP said. PPP found that 51 percent of Republican voters nationwide and 42 percent of GOP votes in New Hampshire, doubt President Barack Obama's citizenship. It says that Trump, with 22 percent, and Romney, with 21 percent, are virtually tied among those who do not believe Obama was born in the United States.

While the poll indicates that Trump challenges Romney's lead among GOP voters in New Hampshire, it also shows that Romney and other potential candidates are viewed far more favorably than Trump in the Granite State.

Trump, in fact, has the worst, favorable-unfavorable split among the 14 potential candidates tested.

Trump is viewed favorably by 41 percent and unfavorably by 43 percent of those polled with 16 percent undecided.

Romney has the strong numbers. He is viewed favorably by 68 percent, unfavorably by 19 percent with 13 percent undecided.

The potential candidate with the second highest favorability rating is Rudolph Giuliani, with 62 percent, while 22 percent viewed him unfavorably.

Third is Ron Paul with a 53-21 percent favorable-unfavorable split and 26 percent undecided.

Asked how Trump can be so close to Romney in the "horse race" despite a huge difference in favorability ratings, PPP spokesman Tom Jensen said, "People who like Romney and Gingrich and Palin and the like won't necessarily vote for them." But he said Trump supporters are more dedicated and committed to vote for him.

Part of PPP's poll focused on Romney's support in 2006 for a Massachusetts health care law mandating the purchase of health insurance.

PPP says its poll found that 61 percent of those polled opposed a health insurance mandate at the state level, while 14 percent favored a mandate with the other 25 percent undecided.

But the poll showed that even among those who said they would not be willing to vote for a candidate that supported a mandate, without Trump in the mix, Romney leads Huckabee, 27 to 14 percent, with 13 percent for Gingrich, 12 percent for Paul and 10 percent for Palin, with the others in single digits.

When Trump is added to the list, those who say they oppose a mandate are split between Trump, with 23 percent, and Romney, with 22 percent, with Gingrich at 13 percent, Huckabee at 11 percent and the others in single digits.

PPP said this phenomenon "suggests that as more of these voters are reminded by Ronney's opponents of his past actions on health care, the lower he will fall."


TOPICS: New Hampshire; Parties; Polls; State and Local
KEYWORDS: certifigate; polls; romney; trump
Since that is Daily Kos' pollster, a big grain of salt is needed.
1 posted on 04/05/2011 11:51:08 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Trump vs. Romney = Iran vs. Iraq = CBS vs. NBC = Notre Dame vs. Penn State.


2 posted on 04/05/2011 11:54:56 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If Trump beats Romney in NH, Romney is done.

Think about it.


3 posted on 04/05/2011 11:56:26 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Hu's your daddy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Romney wouldn’t stand a chance against Trump.

Trump is a street fighter and goes all in.

Romney is a crumpet eating fair weather republican.

That said, Trump’s not running so it don’t matter.


4 posted on 04/05/2011 11:56:44 AM PDT by Vendome ("Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it anyway")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman
If Trump beats Romney in NH, Romney is done. Think about it.

Same if Trump beats Huckster.

5 posted on 04/05/2011 11:57:49 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Let me say that I'm not a Trump fan. But I'm getting a sense that there is a demographic who would like to see a "tough as nails" type businessman who isn't afraid to say what he means and mean what he says. People are getting tired of the typical politician whose every word is "measured". Trump doesn't care about that and that's what I think some like about him.

Again I'm not saying I back the guy. He has far too much baggage in my opinion but I'm just trying to explain why I think some people might find him interesting and exciting.
6 posted on 04/05/2011 11:59:00 AM PDT by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Why are the biggest losers on the top of the list??? Ooooops the Daily Kos, that explains it.


7 posted on 04/05/2011 12:00:31 PM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (The storm clouds of war are on the horizon, 1939 is again approaching us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft

Trump/Christy, naaaaaaah! It’ll never happen.


8 posted on 04/05/2011 12:02:27 PM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (The storm clouds of war are on the horizon, 1939 is again approaching us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Huck has no chance in NH.

You got to look at each early state as its own entity.

Iowa, Romney has no chance so he needs NH.
NH, Huck has no chance so he needs IA.

Bachmann in IA and Trump in NH might block them both in their respective states. Then SC would chose between Bachmann, Trump, or other.


9 posted on 04/05/2011 12:02:27 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (Hu's your daddy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The people are FED-UP!

FED

-UP!


10 posted on 04/05/2011 12:03:19 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

Are you sure he’s not running? He has the one thing all presidental candidates need: a huge ego.

In this “anything could happen” year, Trump may have decided its worth a shot.

He may also have other motivations for running than winning.

Economicly, Trump is closely tied to the Tea Party. And which candidate does Trump hurt the most? Romney, Mr. anti-Tea Party when it comes to economics. By splitting the Romney/RINO vote, Trump will open to door to an actual economic conservative (or at least help prevent a repeat of last cycle, where the conservatives split their vote and we ended up with McRino).


11 posted on 04/05/2011 12:05:49 PM PDT by Brookhaven (Moderates = non-thinkers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Wow, that REALLY makes me feel better......


12 posted on 04/05/2011 12:06:09 PM PDT by sickoflibs ("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

One way or another, it is a 100% certainty that Mitt Romney will not be the next president of the United States.

Whether this is because he (1) wisely choses not to run, (2) drops tens of millions of his own money into losing a primary, or (3) loses the general election to Barack Hussein Obama I cannot say.

But he will not be president.


13 posted on 04/05/2011 12:08:01 PM PDT by Yet_Again
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It might be good news for Palin. If Romney has no mo’ in NH, I doubt Trump or Romney can do much damage out West.


14 posted on 04/05/2011 12:10:13 PM PDT by DaxtonBrown (HARRY: Money Mob & Influence (See my Expose on Reid on amazon.com written by me!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaxtonBrown

Other than those states where “sister wives” is a common term, you mean?


15 posted on 04/05/2011 12:12:33 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet ("You cannot invade the US There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass." Yamamoto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman

This is nothing more than a poll for this period in time. Now we even inject the opposite ends of the MOE to get a tie... lol.

....The margin of error for the poll is 5 percent, according to PPP, meaning the Romney-Trump numbers are close to a virtual tie.....

Interesting polling developements out in the lands of early primaries. Huckabee leading in Iowa and South Carolina and Romney in NH.


16 posted on 04/05/2011 12:15:06 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

I’d vote for Donald Trump. Is he perfect? Not even close, but my country needs a President who can lead within the guidelines of the U. S. Constitution. The economy, morality, religion, education, environmentalism, etc., etc. are going to be moot points if we continue down the road to Communism.


17 posted on 04/05/2011 12:17:06 PM PDT by July4 (Remember the price paid for your freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
For all you amateur analysts (who are or will post here and in the future about possible Republican nominees), let me repeat a warning I gave before the 2010 elections. Whoever is the nominee will need to unite all groups in the Republican/Conservative area and get a lot of independents as well. If not then defeat is certain and Obama gets a second term. Here are my reasons:

1. The Black Vote- Obama will get 95% no matter what. We could have 30% unemployment, 50% inflation, and gas prices could be $10/gal and Obama will get about 95% of black vote. Nothing, I repeat nothing will change that. There's is no amount of pandering which will change that much.

2. Hispanic Vote- Obama is guaranteed to get about 75% of the Hispanic Vote no matter what. The reasons are slightly different from #1 above but the certainty of this cannot be denied.

3. Asian Vote- Obama will get between 60-70% of the Asian Vote no matter what. Again this is too involved but in a nutshell most newly minted Asian voters are interested in what government can do for them and so they are natural democrats.

4. Union Members & Government Employee's Count on Obama getting over 60% of these voters. These are people with an incredible sense of entitlement and they are gonna push the D button no matter what. They don't care about debt or the future but that want it now no matter what. They are tailor made democrats.

5. People under 30. They don't call them the stupid generation for nothing. They richly deserve this title and Obama will get 60% of their votes.

6. Lunatic White Liberals Most of these types should be institutionalized and Obama is gonna get 90% of their votes. Granted they are a small minority, but they vote in big numbers. They still think the Democrats are the party of Harry Truman or JFK. These folks are pathetic.

So the Republicans have their work cut out for them. Any candidate who cannot unite both fiscal and social conservatives is doomed. Any candidate who cannot get a huge amount of independent voters is doomed. This next election will not be determined by the likes of people who post on free republic. Just ask Senator Christine O'Donnell.
18 posted on 04/05/2011 12:25:25 PM PDT by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

Pretty sure.

He does this every four years and has for the last 20 years. He employs a PR firm that helps him keep his name out there to enhance the image of his companies. He wrote about it in one of his books.

Trump loves being rich and the White House would cramp his lifestyle with the restrictions being President imposes on your life.

Romney’s wasting time.

Trump isn’t.


19 posted on 04/05/2011 12:44:38 PM PDT by Vendome ("Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it anyway")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Im glad to see Trump in. No matter what he is a street fighter and doesnt hold back. Refreshing after a yr of Romney and the slimey huckster.


20 posted on 04/05/2011 1:30:22 PM PDT by rrrod (at home in Medellin Colombia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson