Posted on 11/27/2010 12:37:39 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
America needs a strong, independent, common-sense conservative to lead us out of the recession, the weakness of the current administration and the way the elites have squandered our economy, foreign policy and tax money. That person is Sarah Palin.
I can assure you that I am not an elite. I am just a gal speaking her mind based on conversations in my circles. You can say I am a bad girl for say it aloud, you can dismiss what i am saying because you don’t want any rain on your parade. Fine, dismiss what I am saying outright. Just don’t hint that I am a liar or have ulterior motives. I have been ‘busted’ at nothing. I have done nothing to be busted for. It is understandable that I would be jumped on by those who would attack anyone who is not 100% mesmerized by Sarah tho. But I promise you, I wish her no harm. If she is a viable candidate with no one more qualified, I would vote for her. I won’t sign my support in blood just yet tho. Not until I see who is running.
Ok flame away. It is nice to see that there are so many supporters who will not allow anyone to speak things that are not 100% all pro sarah, all the time! not even from those who dont hate her.
Oh well....
You’re really hilarious, ya know.
“you party hacks”
Which party would that be?
“You offer nothing new... in ideas or propaganda.”
What ideas would these be? That Sarah is over saturated and it is not 100% positve, 100% of the time? That is nothing new? So, it has been said before, huh? And what exactly is the proaganda you are accusing me of peddling?
Question... are you always so quick to get angered and blanket label anyone who might be 100% on board with how you think things should be?
Here’s a thought... if you think I am some secret agent with a hidden agenda and propaganda galore... then it will be really easy for you to not pay attention to my observations, right.
Your reply was better than mine.
“is not 100% mesmerized by Sarah tho. .... If she is a viable candidate with no one more qualified.....I won’t sign my support in blood”
“You out yourself by your own words. Out of the heart, the mouth speaks. Don’t try to ‘get it’ - being above the fray isn’t for everyone.”
What I said:
“It is understandable that I would be jumped on by those who would attack anyone who is not 100% mesmerized by Sarah tho. But I promise you, I wish her no harm. If she is a viable candidate with no one more qualified, I would vote for her. I won’t sign my support in blood just yet tho. Not until I see who is running.”
If you are gonna quote me, at least quote the whole sentences. Sniping and snipping to make things look like they are not does not make you clever.
Lookit, The thread was opened asking for comments, I made one. You might not like it, you might not agree with it. But the James Bond crap is old. Don’t put words in my mouth, assign false ideas to me and paste hidden agendas in my direction. And, For Pete’s sake... if you are gonna quote me, quote me fully. This isn’t the National Enquirer.
I hope she does set them all straight. I realize that she knows no fear when it comes to the media and those running them.
Question... are you always so quick to get angered and blanket label anyone who might be 100% on board with how you think things should be? Here’s a thought... if you think I am some secret agent with a hidden agenda and propaganda galore...
***Maybe he just thought you were another freeper with Palin Derangement Syndrome (PDS). You might want to read a few of these Palin threads before you jump in with your above-it-all BS. That tactic was used time & again in the last election cycle by tootyfruityrudybot RINOs. If you keep it up, here’s what you have to look forward to:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1821435
“That tactic was used time & again in the last election cycle by tootyfruityrudybot RINOs. If you keep it up, here’s what you have to look forward to:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1821435";
The requested document does not exist on this server. Okay
And again... I am not understanding the ‘above it all BS’. There is nothing BS about what I said, nothing sneaky, nothing hidden or meant to be anything else but what I said. I said there are people around me who are getting sick to death of hearing about Sarah Palin non stop on tv, news papers, radio and online. I know people who are not as supportive of her anymore. These are true statements and falling short of giving names and address to prove it, you guys have a choice to consider what I am saying and seeing if there is anyone else saying the same... or dismissing it outright. But calling me names and making accusations for what I said is just plain silly.
Unless of course there really is a rule that not being behind sarah all the way will get you jumped on.
If she runs, I’m voting for her, period.
Unless someone whom we have not heard about shows up out of the blue, Mrs. Palin is the only person who will agree to run for that terrible job that have any degree of trust in.
When she says something, anything, I really believe that she is speaking the truth as far as she knows it. There has been no politician since Reagan, IMHO, who has been able to do the same. I don’t believe that Bush was a liar but to paraphrase Reagan, he knew so much that wasn’t so.
So go ahead, do your best, flame away. I trust this woman, I would let her babysit my grandchildren. I would let her send us to war. I can’t say that about any other potential challengers.
Sorry about that. I tested this link.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1821435/posts?page=1
There is nothing BS about what I said, nothing sneaky, nothing hidden or meant to be anything else but what I said.
***Then you have nothing to hide, and time will tell if you were an unaware soul who wandered into the middle of a discussion where such tactics were used in the past.
I said there are people around me who are getting sick to death of hearing about Sarah Palin non stop on tv, news papers, radio and online.
***That’s fantastic! The last candidate I supported, Duncan Hunter, kept getting the criticism of “Duncan Who?”. Now that there’s a conservative in the race with name recognition, there will be little excuse for RINO/CINOs not to support her.
I know people who are not as supportive of her anymore. These are true statements and falling short of giving names and address to prove it, you guys have a choice to consider what I am saying and seeing if there is anyone else saying the same... or dismissing it outright.
***Basically, you say that she has so much name recognition and free press, even before the race begins, that she doesn’t even need to spend $$$ on that much media. I don’t see the downside.
But calling me names and making accusations for what I said is just plain silly.
***It is not silly. If you are what you say you are, then you’ll realize that what you said sounds so very much like what is said from PDSers that it was indistinguishable. So if what you say was true, you have had your say and you’re done with it.
Unless of course there really is a rule that not being behind sarah all the way will get you jumped on.
***You need to check your own post above, where you said to “flame away”.
Simply rovian.
LLS
Sorry about that. I tested this link.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1821435/posts?page=1
+++ No problem, I will look at it in a few minutes.
There is nothing BS about what I said, nothing sneaky, nothing hidden or meant to be anything else but what I said.
***Then you have nothing to hide, and time will tell if you were an unaware soul who wandered into the middle of a discussion where such tactics were used in the past.
+++ No, I really mean it... I have nothing to hide. I could tell you anecdotes of where I was, with whom and what was said. I really could. If those tactics were used before, I can only say that ... well, no I can’t, because i wasn’t there and I don’t know what happened. So, I really and genuinely don’t know what tactics were used.
I said there are people around me who are getting sick to death of hearing about Sarah Palin non stop on tv, news papers, radio and online.
***That’s fantastic! The last candidate I supported, Duncan Hunter, kept getting the criticism of “Duncan Who?”. Now that there’s a conservative in the race with name recognition, there will be little excuse for RINO/CINOs not to support her.
+++ I liked Hunter a lot. The press treated him horribly. IIRC, he walked on to the set of a morning news show bcuz they kept blowing him off. He was probably the most conservative in the race. There were many who stayed in the race long after they should have left and Hunter should have been given a fair chance. But I cannot speak for RINOs/CINOs.
I know people who are not as supportive of her anymore. These are true statements and falling short of giving names and address to prove it, you guys have a choice to consider what I am saying and seeing if there is anyone else saying the same... or dismissing it outright.
***Basically, you say that she has so much name recognition and free press, even before the race begins, that she doesn’t even need to spend $$$ on that much media. I don’t see the downside.
+++No, what I am trying to say is that not all attention is positive attention. And over-saturation is not always a positive thing.
But calling me names and making accusations for what I said is just plain silly.
***It is not silly. If you are what you say you are, then you’ll realize that what you said sounds so very much like what is said from PDSers that it was indistinguishable. So if what you say was true, you have had your say and you’re done with it.
+++Ok, If i am what I say I am (And it is getting frustrating to have to prove I am not something else) I should realize that it sounds so very much like PSDers that is was indistinguishable. Please tell me what a PDSer is and I might have a better response to that. You meantioned rootyootyrudisomething in a previous post. I am guessing there were Rudi supporters that were annoying ppl?
Unless of course there really is a rule that not being behind sarah all the way will get you jumped on.
***You need to check your own post above, where you said to “flame away”.
+++ Touche’ :D
See what I mean?
Please tell me what a PDSer is and I might have a better response to that.
***I did that in post 49.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.