That article is nothing but apologetics on the Ward-Obama plagiarism which was a crappy amateurs mistake by Ward.
It does not even seem pertinent to your “the Democrats win either way.” allegation.
Labrador is a strong conservative aside from a potential (not certain IMO) blemish on the immigration issue. Suggesting there’s no good reason to elect him over Faux-Con rat Walt Minnick is in my option, irrational.
Just yesterday, Walt Minnick voted to repeal the military’s Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy and allow homosexuals to serve openly in our Armed Forces.
And Minnick appears to be 100% pro-abortion, going so far as to vote for abortion funding in the District of Columbia, for subsidizing Planned Parenthood (the biggest abortion provider in the nation), and against the Stupak Amendment of November 2009 that prohibited abortion funding in Obamacare. He’s so pro-abortion that his supposed “fiscal conservatism” always goes out the window when the issue is whether our tax dollars should be used to pay for abortions.
http://nrlc.www.capwiz.com/nrlc/bio/id/62390&submit.x=15&submit.y=18&submit=go
There was no plagerism. Labrador's supporter admitted, bragged about, fabricating the video through extensive editing.
With editing, you could make a Reagan speech match up with a Carter speech.
Labrador is a skunk, and if he gets elected, you will see him vote for amnesty, and turn against every conservative thing you now think he represents.