There was no plagerism. Labrador's supporter admitted, bragged about, fabricating the video through extensive editing.
With editing, you could make a Reagan speech match up with a Carter speech.
Labrador is a skunk, and if he gets elected, you will see him vote for amnesty, and turn against every conservative thing you now think he represents.
You really believe some nutty conspiracy theory about the video of Ward’s speech being doctored or something? The only editing done to Obama’s and Ward’s videos was to remove specific references to the specific race (such as Obama mentioning John Kerry’s name). If you watch the end of the side-by-side video produced by that state senator, you’ll see the full text of Obama’s passage and exactly what was extracted. You need to face the fact that Ward plagiarized Obama’s speech, just as he plagiarized the issue positions from the websites of other Republicans. That doesn’t mean that Ward is a bad person or an Obama fan (his years of service in the Marines and CIA prove him to be a patriot), but it does mean that he wasn’t a very good congressional candidate.
And would you really support a Democrat who has a pro-abortion and pro-gay voting record and who will vote for a Democrat Speaker who will push amnesty for illegal aliens and open borders over a Republican with a solidly conservative voting record and who has consistently stated that he opposes open borders and amnesty? I acknowledge that Labrador cast a disappointing vote on the legal residency verification requirement, and that we have to hold his feet to the fire to ensure that he votes the right way in Congress (and if you don’t like the way he votes in Congress you can bote against him in the primary next time), but allowing a liberal Democrat to win is idiotic.