Posted on 05/12/2008 6:43:43 PM PDT by tueffelhunden
It's probably no secret to anyone who reads my column regularly that I will not be voting for either Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton for president.
But I also will not be voting for John McCain.
I could tell you all the reasons and have expressed them already in a number of columns in recent months. But this time, I'll let someone with whom I seldom agree express them for me.
His name is Jonathan Chait, a senior editor at The New Republic. Here's what he wrote in that magazine:
"Even though it is in the public record, McCain's voting behavior during Bush's first term is almost never mentioned in the press anymore. Yet McCain's secret history is simply astonishing. It is no exaggeration to say that, during this crucial period, McCain was the most effective advocate of the Democratic agenda in Washington.
(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...
This is the perfect representation of John McLame's campaign for President if he insists on hollering like Algore about CO2 and planting his dopey @$$ in front of windmill pictures. Down in flames again Johnny Boy.
Yeah, that kind of posting is common among Democrats posting here or Libertarians who can be at times even further left.
Sorry, dear.
Only candidates pre-approved by the main stream media and the inside the Beltway power brokers are eligible!
(much sarcasm!)
Well, we’ll just have to go over their heads, then.
Shouldn’t be that tough, considering where their heads are currently located!
;-)
Last night I was looking for a Pens thread. Great game. Is there and active NHL thread to follow?
Yes! Here’s the link -
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2005116/posts
And as luck would have it, I am the keeper of the “Hockey Ping List”, if you’d like to be added.
LOL! And they’ll never even see us coming!
New tagline, picked up from Dr. Keyes on the Laurie Roth Show which just finished up.
Please add me. Thanks. Will be tuned into Versus for video and 105.9FM for audio tomorrow.
Thanks!
“You have a very interesting posting history here. It seems your only goal in all of your posts is to make sure the current Republican candidates lose and the Democrats win.”
You are either a good liar or a bad idiot. “All” my posts are not about Republican candidates. A good number are about Juanito McBackstabber. A few others are to be found on the Religious threads. Yet more can be found on Youtube and Music Dedication threads on the weekends. “All” my posts? I’m going to go with “good liar.”
“You cannot deny you(r) posting history.”
I wouldn’t think of it
“I am convinced now that you are a DU troll.”
And I am convinced that you are a lazy person, leaping to this idiotic conclusion in order to end debate/conversation.
Why don’t you check my sign-up date.
I agree with him completely.
“So you are a leftarded troll and admit to voting in the Democratic congress.”
No, liar.
“What is your screen name at DU?”
What is yours at RINOS R us?
Read this whole thread, this girl is a drama queen big time.
Are you calling me out punk?
“Are you calling me out punk?”
Why, is your name “out punk?”
Well are you punk?
“Well are you punk?”
No, I’m Grunthor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.