Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: presidio9
Yeah well, when that also applies to calls to their lawyers, and taking into account that a lot of the people we're talking about have only been charged and haven't been convicted (and are therefore innocent in the eyes of the law), we are talking due-process violation.

Not like you ever had a use for the Constitution other than toilet paper, but the rest of us happen to like seeing the nation follow the law.
4 posted on 08/27/2003 7:13:00 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Welcome to the Iraq Roach Motel - Islamofascists check in, but they don't check out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: thoughtomator
Awwwww: Are expensive phone calls a violation of your Constitutional Right to illegal drugs? TS!
7 posted on 08/27/2003 7:17:31 AM PDT by presidio9 (Run Al Run!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: thoughtomator
Yeah well, when that also applies to calls to their lawyers, and taking into account that a lot of the people we're talking about have only been charged and haven't been convicted (and are therefore innocent in the eyes of the law), we are talking due-process violation.

Wrong. Prisons are used to house individuals who have been convicted of felonies with incarceration periods from 1 year to life. Jails are used for short term incarceration with periods under 1 year and for short term incarceration of individuals awaiting trial who have not yet been convicted, but are deemed a flight risk or danger to the community.

People who are in prison and making calls to their lawyers have been convicted and sentenced. Calls to their lawyers would be associated only with an appeals process.

77 posted on 08/27/2003 11:18:08 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson